fbpx
Boost Your Cash Flow in 2024 with These “Self-Management” Tips

Boost Your Cash Flow in 2024 with These “Self-Management” Tips

Want more cash flow with less stress while running your rental property portfolio? Then you need self-management! Amelia McGee and Grace Gudenkauf, seasoned investors and the minds behind BiggerPockets’ newest book, The Self-Managing Landlord, show you exactly how to do it. This episode peels back the curtain on the misconceptions that scare most investors away from self-managing their properties (like those feared 2 AM toilet emergencies!). Amelia and Grace expose how these scenarios are less frequent than most people think and offer smart strategies to handle them effortlessly.

The duo dives into the financial perks of taking the reins on property management, from dramatically cutting costs to boosting tenant retention and cash flow. They lay out a spectrum of management models—from DIY to hiring a dedicated team—and share their personal triumphs (and trials) within each approach. This is THE practical playbook for making property management a cornerstone of your real estate success.

You’ll learn how to establish effective systems for tenant onboarding, routine maintenance, and urgent repairs, ensuring your property management is both stress-free and profitable. Whether you’re just dipping your toes into real estate investing with your first property or looking to refine your existing portfolio, this episode is packed with actionable tips that promise to make your portfolio more passive! 

Click here to listen on Apple Podcasts.

Listen to the Podcast Here

Read the Transcript Here

Ashley:
This is Real Estate rookie episode 401. How can you increase your cashflow in 2024? Reducing expenses is one key way and it may not be as time intensive as you think. My name is Ashley Care and I am here with Tony j Robinson

Tony :
And welcome to the Real Estate Ricky Podcast, where every week, three times a week we’re bring you the inspiration, motivation, and stories you need to hear to kickstart your investing journey. Today we are bringing back to real estate Ricky Alums. We have Amelia McGee who was on episode 111, and we have Grace Guten Ka was on episode 161, and these two ladies are the newest authors for BiggerPockets. So if you guys have her to biggerpockets.com/managing book, you can see their new book that just launched, but we’re excited to talk to them both and really the premise of today’s conversation is why investors get it wrong with handing off their properties. And also what are some of the risks of self-managing and what goes into onboarding tenants and so much more. So ladies, Amelia Grace, thank you so much for coming back. Welcome to the Real Estate Rookie podcast for the second time.

Amelia :
Thank you so much. We’re super excited to be here.

Grace:
Thank you.

Ashley:
Okay, so Amelia, let’s start with you. What is one big misconception that people have that maybe keeps them up at night as to a reason they don’t want to be a self-managing landlord? Yeah,

Amelia :
I hear this reason over and over again. It is that they’re going to get that 3:00 AM leaky toilet phone call, a tenant having an absolute panic attack over some sort of a maintenance request. And honestly, the only landlord that I know that’s ever received one of these calls is Grace. So maybe Grace can share her story on that, but she’s actually the only person I know of that’s had to go through that.

Grace:
Yeah, it’s the infamous leaky toilet call. I’ve only had it once. We can dive into that story if we want, but in general I think people are overly freaked out about all the things that could happen instead of focusing on all the great things and the things that they can do to prevent anything bad happening.

Ashley:
So what is the kind of ratio of the chance of that happening? Do you just have one property that you’ve owned for a week and you already got that nightmare call? Kind of give us an overall view of how slim of a chance that is happening.

Grace:
I mean between the two of us, we have I think 65 properties and we’ve had one of the leaking toilet in the middle of the night call. So the odds are less than 2% I would say. And also like Amelia said, I don’t know anybody else who’s had it. I don’t know why this example is the one that is so popular, but in general, not very likely.

Ashley:
I recently went to self-managing, I self-managed, and then I outsourced to a property management company for three years. And now I’ve come back and I related so much to the book you guys have written because you talk about there’s three options to self-manage where you’re doing everything. There’s hiring a third party property management team, and then there’s also hiring your own property manager that works for you and kind of building your own team. And that’s what I’ve done the last year. And I really want you to touch on those three different things and how they actually compare and how they are different.

Amelia :
So the first one that everyone thinks of is self-managing and you’re running around a chicken with your head cut off, you’re constantly fighting fires, you’re doing things the old school way, the mom and pop way of accepting rent in any way, shape or form. You’re getting phone calls and text messages. You have really no system. So that’s the first option that a lot of people think of. The second is property management companies. And just to be blunt, I think I’ve heard probably 95% property management company horror stories over successful stories. A lot of people don’t love property management companies and that’s just because they have to have so many properties under management to actually make a profit. It’s hard for them to provide good quality service to all of them. And the in-between option is being an organized and systemized property manager that hires an internal person to be on your team, whether that’s part-time or full-time that does a lot of the brunt of the work for

Tony :
You. I love that middle ground. And just like Ash, we’ve kind of built out our own management team internally as well, and I do think there’s a lot of benefits to that. And personally, I’m super excited for this episode to hear more about the systems and processes you set up on the long-term rental side to see if there are any things that I can maybe steal for our short-term rentals because it is a slightly different approach when you’re dealing with guests versus tenants, but I hope some of those foundations are still the same. I think maybe zooming out just for our listeners to maybe get a good foundation here, but when we talk about the word landlord, what exactly are the responsibilities of a landlord and grace, let’s start with you.

Grace:
A landlord is a lot more than a lot of people realize. First of all, you’re going to be managing the tenant and leasing and advertising, collecting rent maintenance requests, but there’s the second part a lot of people forget about and that’s being the business owner, that’s the bookkeeping and any of the marketing and any of the tax work or legal work. So when people think about doing this job, we really want people to think about, Hey, you’re a business owner, not just somebody who leases a property.

Ashley:
That’s so true. It’s not just, oh, you’re getting a rent check and you’re paying the mortgage and you own a rental property and you’re getting a text once in a while to have a maintenance guy out. There’s so much more involved in that. So what are some of the actual risks of being a landlord? Sure.

Amelia :
The first one is the tenants. It’s really important for you to onboard great tenants. That’s one of the hardest parts of the job and just the interaction that comes with having tenants in your properties is a risk. Another is managing. I think that’s another rookie fear that a lot of people have is, well, how am I going to get a handyman in the property or how am I going to manage projects? Another is the middle of the night leaky toilet call. So those emergency maintenance requests, how do you handle those? People are always thinking about the what ifs and we’re big fans of proactive property management, so we already have plans in place for when emergencies may come up. And another huge one is the emotional side of the business. So this is very much person to person type of business. There’s a lot of emotions involved. Tenants are going to have things that come up in their life, you’re going to have things in your life. And so just being able to balance that. And then the last one that we think of is the legal risks associated with anything that has to do with owning a property. So leasing, tenant complaints, any of the laws and regulations that surround rental properties, those are all factors that come into play. What

Ashley:
Are some ways that you can actually mitigate these risks? You kind of mentioned you have the processes, the systems in place. Can you maybe go into a little more detail of how someone can mitigate the risk?

Grace:
Honestly, the biggest thing is being proactive. When you’re running around in the day-to-day and you haven’t thought through how you want to handle things or run your business, you’re making emotional on the fly decisions and you’re letting things slip through the cracks and that’s what creates risk. When you’re able to look at things like a business owner and preemptively, think about, okay, what is my tax strategy? What is my legal plan? How do I make sure that I get great tenants into this next unit? You’re already preventing most of the risk and real estate is always going to have risk. It is a risky business, but there’s so many things that you can do to prevent that. If you just take a second to get organized, think ahead and have a plan.

Ashley:
Okay, we’re going to take a short break. Thank you so much for everyone listening for taking the chance to check out our show sponsors. Grace and Amelia have talked to us about what it takes to be a landlord, what’s involved and also what are some of the risks and how to mitigate it. So stay tuned where we’re going to come back and we’re going to be talking about the benefits of actually being a landlord. Welcome back from our short break. We are here with Grace and Amelia, before we get into tenant onboarding, we’re going to be talking about some of the benefits of actually being a landlord. So Amelia, what are some of the benefits as to why someone would want to be a landlord? Yeah,

Amelia :
I think the first benefit of choosing to self-manage your properties is definitely the monetary aspect of it. Typically when you hire a property manager, you’re paying anywhere from 10% of gross monthly rental income plus lots of additional fees, fees, lease signing fees, setup fees, et cetera. So that’s obviously a huge benefit and I both self-managed our portfolios up to over 50 units and that’s because we both wanted to quit our full-time jobs as soon as possible. So we needed every single last penny in our pocket. So that’s definitely the first one.

Ashley:
Tony, when you did your first long-term rental, did you have a lot of these fees that Amelia is talking about and were there any that maybe you didn’t expect that came up and kind of hurt your cashflow from your property manager?

Tony :
Yeah, we definitely, we had a lease up fee for sure, which I think was like 50% of one month’s rent. I think it might’ve been even a full, it was a crazy amount. I was like, holy crap. So there was a lease up fee, but what really hurt us was all of the maintenance fees that they charged. So in addition to having the property management company, they also had their own maintenance company and the only quotes they would give us was from their own maintenance company. So if I wanted to source from someone else, I had to do that work myself. And I wasn’t really, I was new, I didn’t really know what I was doing, so I usually just went with their management company and honestly I paid more to their maintenance company than I did to the management company.

Ashley:
How much do you think your cashflow would’ve increased if you would’ve, how much do you think on average you’re paying out a month?

Tony :
I don’t know. I think when I did the math, I was averaging like 150 bucks of cashflow in that first single family home. And had I brought back the management fee and maybe reduced some of those maintenance expenses, I mean it easily would’ve doubled over the course of a year.

Ashley:
Grace, what about you? Have you ever shopped around to see how much you’re actually saving by self-managing to increase your cashflow?

Grace:
Yeah, and the other thing you have to remember is a lot of management companies will charge you whether they collected rent or not. I just heard somebody talking about this, so don’t forget that even if your tenants aren’t paying a lot of times you’re still going to be charged for it, which is never fun. But Amelia and I did the math the other day on exactly what we would be paying currently if we had a PM for our entire portfolio and it was for Amelia, she’s saving like $60,000 a year. If she was paying 10% for long-term and midterm 15% for me, I would be paying I think it was like $30,000 a year for 10% long-term and 15% midterm. And internally we pay, Amelia pays $500 a month and I pay $1,200 a month, which is a fraction of what my full-time person’s entire job description is. But in Iowa, that is more than a nice salary, especially for Amelia’s portfolio that you can really stretch a long ways if you can keep that in house and you’re going to double the quality for your own portfolio and for your tenants.

Ashley:
Yeah, that’s such a crazy difference. And I think right there, that price point is someone looking into considering taking the time to build out the system and processes to actually make that happen because I’m sure that didn’t happen overnight and we’re going to get into that as to how you guys built out these well machines. So Amelia, please continue. What are some of the other benefits of being a landlord? Yeah,

Amelia :
The second is just the quality of service that you can provide to your tenants. Owning rental properties is very much a customer service based business, whether that’s long-term, midterm or short-term. And your goal as a landlord is to provide the best services possible so that you keep your tenants happy and in turn they stay for as long as possible because the number one cashflow killer in real estate is vacancy. If you have a property that’s sitting vacant for a long time because you just can’t find a good tenant or you can’t keep your tenants happy, that’s really going to affect your bottom line. And the third is that you’re going to need to learn how to property manage anyways, because when people hire out property management, they think that it’s set it and forget it. They’re never going to have to do anything ever again. And that’s just not the case. You’re still going to have to manage the property management company, you need to hold their hand a little bit, tell them how you want things run. So it really isn’t as people think it is,

Ashley:
I have to 100% agree. I did not realize I would have to be an asset manager. When I turned it over to a property management company, I thought like, oh my god, this feels great, just a weight off my shoulders. But I did not realize there is a full job that comes along with outsourcing. You still have to be the asset manager. No one is going to notify you and say like, Hey, your insurance went up a little bit. You should probably shop around. I’m going to shop around for you, get you a better quote. Or you know what, your water bill went up, the toilet might be leaking or something like that or running. But that’s a great point.

Amelia :
And all those little things really add up and that’s another part of being a business owner is looking monthly at all of the things that you’re spending money on, those utility fees, your insurance, your property taxes and analyzing them from a business perspective and are you even making money on these rental properties anymore? So asset management is huge.

Tony :
Yeah, just one point on that, we have a meeting with my team maybe once every other month where we review all the p and ls for our portfolio and it had been a couple months, it was like right after our last daughter was born, so we didn’t have this meeting for three months. So we had the first meeting of the year and we’re looking back the past four months and we see one property just has super high energy costs and we’re like, what the heck is going on with this? We ended up digging into it and because we have so many properties in one city, we have one account for all the properties, but separate billing, we found out that one property was billing another property for their energy costs. There was no energy costs on one property, double on the other one, and we wouldn’t have figured that out had we not dug into the finances. So just ty into what you’re saying, Ash, if even if you have a property manager, no one’s going to be doing that level of digging for you to catch those kinds of things.

Ashley:
So Grace, tell us a little bit about the actual onboarding process of getting these tenants in place. So once you have your property, how important is that? And you guys touched a little bit on the customer service piece that having a vacancy is going to kill you. So please go ahead and explain that process that you guys have put into place.

Grace:
When we first started, our mindset was do as little as possible, just get ’em in, don’t spend a ton of time going over everything so that they can just get in and not be annoying. And now we’ve completely shifted 180 to where we want to have in-person signings where we can go through everything that’s in the lease with the tenant so there are no surprises. So when they do move in their random Uncle Sam, they know exactly that they cannot have somebody in the house that’s not on the lease longer than X amount of days or when we go to do a maintenance request and it turns out it was a tenant caused issue, they know exactly that they’re going to be paying for it because we want everybody’s expectations to be the same. We want our tenants to be happy and stay there for a long time like Amelia said, so that we can cut down on our turnover and make more money and that they can have a home. But I think the biggest thing to realize with property management is the onboarding is so, so important. We’ve had a lot of lessons learned and don’t skimp

Ashley:
It. Amelia, is that similar to how you have experienced the onboarding process?

Amelia :
Yes, absolutely. And I think even before onboarding starts, just having a really comprehensive screening process and knowing your requirements ahead of time and sticking to those, when you onboard a tenant, this is not an emotional decision. You should have a credit score requirement, a background check requirement, landlord references, et cetera. And we actually talk about all of that in the book, so I’m not going to go through all of it, but it’s really important to stick to the guidelines you already have laid out so you’re getting a really high quality tenant in your property and then you continue to set expectations after that, during the actual onboarding process.

Tony :
I want to know a little bit more about the actual onboarding process that you guys have laid out because like you said, I think a lot of people, myself included, leverage virtual assistants and automation to do a lot of the heavy lifting when it comes to managing your properties, but there probably is some benefit in a little bit of face-to-face connection and kind of walking people through things. So at a high level and grace man, we’ll start with you, what does that onboarding checklist actually look like?

Grace:
Two key things that I do that I didn’t do before is one, I have them do a practice maintenance request in the software so they know exactly how to do it and they don’t try to call or text or email. They know exactly what the process is with lots of pictures and videos and descriptions so we can solve it right the first time. And the second thing I do differently is I used to give them a move-in inspection report and just say, if you have something to report, let me know. And so 99% of the time nobody would report anything, so there wasn’t actually any proof of what the moving condition was. Now I make sure when they move in, we are there doing that move inspection together so we’re all on the exact same page with pictures and videos and assigned report of exactly what the condition of the property is because as much as we want people to stay for a long time, the longer people say the harder it is to prove what the condition was at the very beginning. So my checklist just looks like all the things that I need to do to make sure that the landlord tenant relationship is going to be very smooth. We know how our working relationship is going to go, the property management software, all of that good stuff.

Tony :
I love the idea of making them do the test maintenance request with you because the worst thing is them calling you like you said in the middle of the night for a leaky toilet when all they have to do is put in the maintenance request. So I guess I’m curious, right, when you guys are dealing with tenant who’s been there for a while, and like you said Grace, sometimes it’s hard to know if it was like that when the guest moved in or if it was a tenant related issue. How do you guys, and Amelia, maybe you can answer this question for us, but how do you guys deal with when maybe there’s a disconnect and the tenant’s like, Hey, you as the landlord need to fix this versus you thinking that the tenant might be responsible for that maintenance issue?

Amelia :
That’s a good question. It’s a fine line and I feel like as landlords we have to err on the side of caution. Unless you have clear evidence that whatever the issue was was caused by the tenant, you probably are going to be on the hook for paying for it. I would rather keep a tenant happy pay for it myself unless I can really concrete prove that it was their fault.

Grace:
I think one thing we both do well is making the lease the bad guy and always pointing back to the source of truth of, Hey, it’s not me saying you need to pay this late fee or that you have to pay for this broken window. It’s actually the 10 sheet long piece of contract that you signed and I have to treat all of my tenants fairly. So no, I can’t make an emotional one-off decision for you. I’m sorry, it’s not me, it’s the least.

Ashley:
I want to touch on something real quick to kind of get everybody listening excited about what you guys are talking about as far as taking the time to build out this system because I’m going to take a guess and I’m going to say at this point and your business, none of your tenants have your cell phone number. No.

Amelia :
No.

Ashley:
Yes. And that’s a why I want to highlight that is to, that’s a really exciting point to get to as a rookie investor where you are not actually the one physically communicating on your phone or texting them that there are other ways to navigate that, whether it’s through property management software or it’s through using a va, all these different things. So just as you guys were talking, I was thinking about that as you’re saying the systems you’ve implemented and how you handle things that you’re not even having to be the bad guy anymore. It’s not you physically saying it on the phone to the person. So let’s go into the importance of the lease agreement. I’m currently this property right now that it’s a five unit and four of the people don’t even have lease agreements in the place. So tell us how important is it that I get a lease agreement in there right away? Okay,

Amelia :
So I’m actually going through a situation with inherited tenants right now that did have lease agreements, but oh my gosh, even up to this point I have 41 doors and Ashley, you have quite a portfolio too. I’m still learning new things and the lease is so important, it protects you, it protects the tenant. We recommend that you use a local attorney that knows the local laws in your area and that knows your property specifically. So we do a lot of midterm and long term. So we have different leases for our midterm and our long term and we have attorneys that help us draft those. And I know it’s another expense, man, owning real estate is expensive. There’s all these little fees that add up and add up, but I would totally recommend if you’re going to spend that extra $500, make it your lease. And also just another quick note, if you’re inheriting tenants, sign a month to month lease with them for the first six months, run background checks on them, run credit checks on them, make them go through the whole process that you would any other tenant because I’m currently going through something that is biting me in the butt because I did not follow my procedures on that.

Amelia :
I actually didn’t even have procedures. Now I do, but inherited tenants, you got to put ’em through the ringer too.

Ashley:
Yeah, that is a great point. I never thought about adding in that step of actually making them go through basically the application process as they’re becoming my tenants. So yeah, that’s a great point. The only other things I’ve done in the past is do an estoppel agreement where I’m verifying what the landlord is saying and what they are saying. And I think adding in that piece of having them go through the application process. And then also I really like just doing a month to month lease to start and to kind of give them that trial basis to see how they work out. And then where are some places that someone could find lease agreements? I think it’s a freebie with your guys’ books.

Amelia :
So if you order our book, you get access to state specific leases and a whole bunch of other landlord specific things in our lovely landlord packet and it’s got a ton of information in there for you, but take that lease and then have an attorney just double check it to make sure that we’re not missing anything.

Tony :
One follow up before we move on from this topic of leases and screening rescreening existing tenants. So say Ashley, with this property that she’s looking at, there’s no leases in place and she does the background check, the normal application process and maybe this person doesn’t pass. I guess Amelia Grace and maybe Grace, we’ll start with you. What would your process be if that person didn’t pass? Are you giving them notice that they have to or what do you do if they don’t pass? Well,

Grace:
First of all, you need to define what is pass and that’s something I’ve not done for myself, but exactly the credit score and the income requirement and the landlord verification. And for me, yeah, I always post a notice no matter what. Even if it’s a situation where a tenant’s telling me, Hey, I’m going to be late, I let them know I have to post the notice according to the lease and to keep everything fair as long as you pay within that time, don’t worry about it, it’s just paperwork. Thanks for letting me know. But that way you’ve already started the procedure of an eviction if you have to, which try to avoid that at all costs. But that’s what I would do with any of the tenants who are inherited is let them know from the beginning what it’s going to look like and be clear with them. So that’s not a surprise of these are my requirements. If you don’t pass it, you’re going to have to have a notice. Obviously you can work with them a little bit if they need some extra time or to move out, I would do that, but I would post a notice right away.

Tony :
Amelia, same for you or any differences there? Yeah,

Amelia :
So again, this comes back to taking the emotion out of owning rental properties. So you have to have your systems and processes that you abide by and if you inherit a tenant that doesn’t meet your requirements, it’s tough. But I would say you have to serve them that notice and get them out. I will tell you from experience that you will save money in the long run by onboarding tenants that meet all of your requirements rather than just taking the easy route and keeping those inherited tenants that are maybe paying their rent every month, maybe late some months, et cetera, but have other baggage that comes with them. And I’m not ragging on inherited tenants, but I mean there’s just things that come with them.

Tony :
If we can talk about that just a little bit, maybe the tenants who they’re pain but they’re just kind of like a pain in the butt to manage. Have you guys found maybe a creative way to deal with those type of tenants? What’s working for you there?

Grace:
Amelia and I always call this the happiness clause. If you are dealing with somebody who it’s like no matter what you do, you cannot make them happy. We tell them, Hey, it seems like you’re not happy. We’re happy to fix X, Y, and Z, but if you want to move elsewhere, we’re happy to break this lease because we want tenants who are happy and living in this unit and probably majority of the time they stop complaining like, I don’t want to move. I actually love it here. I just was bored and had all these complaints and I have had one person move and actually two between all of my long-terms and midterms and it was a blessing that they moved.

Ashley:
Okay, so we’re going to take a short break, but when we come back, I want you to stick around because we’re going to talk about the importance of systems and why Grace unfortunately had an $8,000 bill because her process wasn’t dialed in, and we’re also figure out how to do all of this without giving yourself a full-time job. We’ll be right back. Okay, we’re back from our short break. Thank you everyone for taking the time to check out our show sponsor. So Grace, I’m intrigued. Please tell us about this very expensive cost of $8,000 that you had to pay.

Grace:
Yes, it was a bookkeeping expense because when I first started all of my rental properties and my burrs, I forgot that it’s also a business and you have to keep up with all the business aspects that we talked about earlier. So I had probably 15 to 20 rentals, tons of rehabs, refinances, and I let my bookkeeping slide to the wayside. So when I finally was ready to get it all caught up and get everything systemized, it took me three different bookkeepers over a year and $8,500 to get my books up to snuff. And I know that exact number because now my books are fantastic and I can literally pull that exact number from my QuickBooks, but it just illustrates to those who are starting real estate. I’m not saying that you need to go hire a bookkeeper, but you do need a bookkeeping system from your very first property. Maybe it’s once a year, maybe it’s once a quarter, but you have to do it.

Ashley:
Grace, when you found, you decided it was time to actually implement that. How much did it slow down your acquisition piece at all? Because now you had to really, really focus on that bookkeeping portion and get that cleaned up before you could even go and acquire more properties?

Grace:
Absolutely. It took all my mental energy, it took a big chunk of my money, $8,500. It took so much of my time because I had no systems of where my utilities were or which LLC owned what property or which tenants were where. So my bookkeeper had to almost pull this information out of me. Now I have a beautiful system where everything’s in all these nice quick guides and really filed in a nice way. And in fact, I filed my taxes on time this year, which is crazy. And my CPA said, wow, that was a really nice LLC overview you gave me. And I thought that was the best compliment ever. I thought about it all day, but I was absolutely not like that. Two years ago everything was in my head or on a sticky note or maybe I had to scroll back in my text messages or find an archived email. There was no system.

Ashley:
I just want everyone listening right now to, if this is Grace is describing you right now, you need to admit that you need help right now and you need to go and find some help with this because it can stop you from growing and scaling. But not only that, you can also get into legal financial you to get the IRS coming after you. There’s so many different things that can affect your bookkeeping, even though it seems like such a small piece. It really is so important to your overall business, and it

Tony :
Sounds like the biggest change that you guys have been able to make is just implementing the right systems and processes, which is so important as you start to build your business. We had some of those similar growing pains as we scaled up our portfolio as well. We went from three Airbnbs to 15 over the course of 12 months, so we had a lot of properties to our portfolio. And when you’re scaling that fast, sometimes those underlying systems don’t necessarily scale with you. So we went through some of that growing pain as well. But I’m curious, what are the SOPs or the standard operating procedures look like in your business today? And if for our rookies that are listening, maybe where should they start when it comes to building out those SOPs? And Amelia, we’ll start with you on that one.

Amelia :
Yeah, so we have SOPs for everything in our business, and if you’re a rookie investor, I know a lot of this seems very daunting and it seems like, man, why would anyone ever self-manage this sounds terrible, but honestly, it doesn’t have to be that way. It really isn’t. But we have an SOP for tenant onboarding. We have an SOP for listing our properties. We have an SOP for what happens during the closing process. Don’t forget to get insurance and turn your utilities on. We are so guilty of forgetting that every single closing until the day of, but we would recommend starting these SOPs from the very beginning. That is one thing Grace and I both did wrong. And for me personally, I grew very quickly. I had 26 doors after one year, and I actually didn’t buy a single property in 2023 because I was so disorganized. I had to spend a whole year just getting caught up, creating those SOPs, just getting organized. And so if you’re listening and you’re about to buy a property, or maybe you just have one or two properties, get organized right now, start documenting everything you’re doing, and if an SOP sounds daunting, call it a checklist, just start writing things down. It doesn’t have to be a whole big sheet of paper that has every little step, but start just documenting the process as you’re going through it the first time.

Ashley:
What are some different softwares or tools that someone could use to help them build out an SOP?

Grace:
There are a few different things. You could use Loom to record videos and maybe have a VA break down the video of what you’re doing and put it in a Google Doc. When it comes to actually executing what’s in our SOP, we both love monday.com. For example, my acquisition checklist as it relates to anything tax time, tax time. Whenever I buy something, I have to go put that closing statement in that year’s folder of closing statements. I have to go add all those utility numbers to my utility numbers, quick guide, all these different things. So Monday has that checklist all broken down so that I can assign it a due date and assign it a person and make sure each nitty gritty thing happens every single time the same way, the same person so that you don’t have to really think about it, you just do it.

Ashley:
You mentioned a quick guide. What is

Grace:
That? Yeah, so I was talking about earlier how my wifi passwords might be in my phone on my notes in my email written down somewhere. A quick guide is just a really concise way to write out all of your property information. So I have quick guides for insurance policies, door codes, wifi passwords, utility shutoffs, where are those all located so that if there’s an emergency, you know exactly where to tell your tenant. Another quick guide just today I decided to implement is writing all of our appliances and whether they’re gas or electric, so that way when I go to sell a property, my realtor can look at that quick guide as she makes her description and does all the disclosures and just knocks it all off. She has all the information right in one spot.

Tony :
Yeah, I absolutely love Monday. I know Ashley used Monday as well, and it’s a really cool tool to kind of capture all the different information you need for your different properties and much like what you guys have outlined, we have checklists inside of Monday as well. And there’s the top level of like, Hey, here’s the results, here’s the end result that needs to happen and all the steps below. And then we actually link to the Loom videos for each step. So each loom video is, I dunno, two minutes long, but they can kind of break it up into digestible pieces and then there’s any supporting documentation or files, and you will add that in another column as well. So now every time someone on my team does something, there’s a Loom video, it’s showing them what they need to do, and we found that a really easy way to train people as they’re coming into our business and doing different things.

Amelia :
I just wanted to add that one other really important piece of software that Grace and I both use, which isn’t an SOP related software, is our property management software. And I know we haven’t really touched on that too much here, but I hear a lot of newbies that even have 3, 4, 5 properties and they still don’t have a property management software. You need to get that set up with your very first property. It makes you look more professional, it saves you time. Yeah, it might cost you $15 a month, but I think BiggerPockets Pro membership, you get rent ready with that, so you could use rent ready for free. It just makes your business run a lot more smoothly. And you really need a property management software.

Grace:
That’s how you don’t do it as a job. A job is when you have no systems, no resources, so you’re collecting rent by hand, driving around town, chasing down your tenants, calling them, texting them, emailing them. Just think about what is the way I put that in air quotes that you’re going to do something and stick to it, and that’s how you systemize something

Ashley:
During this time that you guys have built these systems to not give yourself a full-time job. Have you relied on team members at all? And as a rookie investor, who are the first team members I should be bringing on to this self-management, property management company and building? Yeah,

Amelia :
We’ve both brought on team members at this point. The first person that I hired out was my bookkeeping because it just doesn’t bring me joy at all. I’m the type of person that has seven months worth of receipts sitting on my desk that I’m going to get to next week. I’m going to get to next week. And so that was the first person I hired out. Grace, we all know that She also hired that out at this point after spending a lot of money on one. And the second is the internal property manager that we haven’t really talked too much about. We talked about it at the beginning, but Grace and I both got systemized. We organized our businesses and then we were able to hand it off to someone else that runs our businesses the way we documented it and the way we want it run.

Grace:
Yeah. Another thing is if you are trying to train your property manager or anybody on your team on what’s in your head, that’s never going to work because they’re always going to have to come back to you to figure out how to do something. Whereas if you have a checklist that you can say, well, what does the checklist say? Or actually we’re going to do it differently this time, I’m going to update the checklist or the SOP. That’s how you figure out how to run a business and actually be hands

Ashley:
Off. Let me ask, how did you go about finding your property manager? Are they virtual? Do they live where your properties are? Explain that process for somebody who wants to take action

Grace:
On that. I found my first internal property manager for 10 hours a week at 20 bucks an hour through a real estate Facebook group that was local. She wanted to learn real estate, so she did my property management for 10 hours a week, all the virtual stuff for about a year after that year. I flipped that into a full-time position with a project management to do my blips. And now that person is full-time salaried. He’s also there physically, but he also had property management experience and was already in the industry.

Tony :
I want to ask one follow up to that grace, because when I think about property management, I feel like it’s hard to kind of corral those responsibilities into 10 perfect hours. So were they not doing anything guest facing or what happened if something happened during the other 30 hours of a typical working week? How would you handle that?

Grace:
Great question. It wasn’t a perfect 10 hours a week. She did know before accepting the job that it’s going to be seven hours one week and 13 the other, and you’re just going to have to keep track of your time. But I know Amelia ran into this with her PM and had a good solution for it.

Amelia :
So I found my property manager through a local Facebook group as well of local investors. So she lives where I live, and she was a newer investor looking to not only learn, but get paid to learn. I think we call that job hacking around here. She’s getting paid to learn. She also gets access to me. So I act as a mentor for her, which I think is a great benefit. I started paying her hourly. I thought that she would work between five and 10 hours a week, and she can work whenever she wants during those hours. It wasn’t like she needs to be on call Monday, one to five or whatever the case may be. So was very flexible. I was paying her hourly. After a couple months, she came back to me and said, Hey, I’m having a really hard time tracking hours because when I respond to a maintenance request or a tenant message, I may be spending five minutes here or five minutes there. I’m having a hard time tracking those hours. So she said, can you just pay me a lump sum every month? And some days, some weeks it might be more than 10, some might be less. It all evens out. And so I said, sure, what do you think you’re worth? She told me $500. I said, that sounds great. Sold. And so that’s how we landed on that. But find somebody that’s looking to learn from you and that has a little bit of experience in real estate,

Tony :
And I feel like I align with that approach as well, Amelia, where you have a little bit more flexibility. So it’s not like necessarily like, Hey, here’s how many hours, but it’s almost like a salaried position where some weeks going to be more, some weeks are going to be less, and sometimes it might be at nine o’clock in the morning. Other times it’s 10 o’clock at night. But you have that flexibility. Ashton know, you’ve obviously been building out your internal management team as well. How does your compensation structure compare to what Grace and Amelia laid out?

Ashley:
So my roles are actually different where I don’t have a property manager that’s boots on the ground. All of the leasing, anything that can be done on a computer is done by a virtual assistant. So she never leaves her desk. She’s on salary. So we do pay her for a set amount of hours. We pay her 40 hours for the week, and that’s also the time she’s on call. So our tenants know they can call her anytime between these hours. She’ll be there to answer the phone. The boots on the ground is actually our maintenance guy. So he actually does the physical showings of the property too, and he does anything that needs somebody there. So tomorrow morning he’s meeting the roofer there to get a quote, things like that. But he started out because he wanted to learn about real estate investing. So it was very similar in that nature. And he did construction. He got laid off in the winter, so for a full winter, he just worked alongside me for free, doing whatever I needed just to learn. And then when it was time for him to go back to work, he ended up coming on to work full time and to take care of all the properties. So similar in that circumstance for sure.

Tony :
Yeah, and I’d say our setup is actually pretty similar on the short-term rental side as well. More so to yours actually, where we have have five EAs on our team right now. But they basically cover, I think 20 hours of the day. There’s like a four hour window early in the morning where no one’s working and we just pay them hourly, but they’re working specific shifts. But that coverage gets us pretty much 24 7. So that’s how we’ve handled in our business as well. But they do pretty much everything virtually, right? Our cleaners and our maintenance crews are the people who are the boots on the ground for us, but our VAs, they’re ordering all the stuff on Amazon, they’re responding to guest messages, they’re coordinating with the plumber, with the HVAC person. So for us, a lot of it can be done virtually for those VAs as well.

Ashley:
Well, grace and Amelia, thank you so much for joining us on this episode, and congratulations on your new book. You guys are also guests on the BiggerPockets Real Estate podcast number 9 3 8 with Dave and Henry. So if you want to learn more about their new book, Self-Managing Landlord, go check out that episode number 9 3 8. You can also go to biggerpockets.com/managing book. Grayson Amelia, thank you so much. We really enjoyed having you guys back on the show. Amelia was on episode 1 1 1, and Grace was on episode 1 61. So you can also go back and check out their origin stories of their real estate investing journey. Make sure you follow us on your favorite podcast platform. You give us a like and subscribe on YouTube and makes you join the real estate rookie Facebook group. I’m Ashley, and he’s Tony. Thank you so much for joining us on this week’s real Estate rookie. We’ll see you guys next time.

Watch the Episode Here

https://youtube.com/watch?v=9bnIZNwPoeg123

Help Us Out!

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

In This Episode We Cover:

  • How to lower your costs and boost your cash flow significantly with self-management
  • What being a landlord is actually like, and why it’s not all 2 AM toilet calls
  • Building your real estate team so you can handle less of the day-to-day and focus on the big picture
  • Practical advice for setting up systems that streamline tenant onboarding and property maintenance
  • Grace’s $8,500 bookkeeping mistake that you CAN NOT afford to make
  • Tips for handling urgent property issues with WAY less stress
  • And So Much More!

Links from the Show

Connect with Amelia:

Connect with Grace:

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.

Boost Your Cash Flow in 2024 with These “Self-Management” Tips

The Rational Investor’s Case Against Bitcoin

Cryptocurrency enthusiasts can’t fathom why Bitcoin will fail. If you tell them that you’re not investing in Bitcoin or other cryptos, they look at you like an uneducated investor, a sheep following the crowd without thinking for yourself. The promise of Bitcoin is so great that you’d have to be an outright fool to deny it, and anyone who refutes the future golden age of a decentralized society is simply mistaken and is only coping with the oncoming collapse of fiat currency and Western civilization.

The problem with that theory? None of it is grounded in reality. Today, BiggerPockets CEO Scott Trench is going to prove it. After years of research on Bitcoin, the blockchain, and cryptocurrency as a whole, Scott has come to a simple conclusion: Bitcoin isn’t worth it. In fact, Bitcoin may be worth, unsurprisingly, nothing! But before all you Bitcoin maximalists come out of the woodwork, claiming we’re forever bullish on index funds and real estate, hear out Scott’s argument.

Scott will explain the case for Bitcoin and why its end goal is actually quite altruistic. However, five fatal flaws will stop Bitcoin from ever becoming a world reserve currency or replacing fiat money. Besides its fatal flaws, Bitcoin isn’t a foolproof cryptocurrency by any means, and we’ll prove it! Finally, Scott gives his Bitcoin price prediction and his recommendation if you do want to hold some Satoshis.

Click here to listen on Apple Podcasts.

Listen to the Podcast Here

Read the Transcript Here

Scott:
In this episode of the BiggerPockets Money Podcast, I Scott, one of our hosts am going to describe exactly what Bitcoin is, what the thesis behind Bitcoin is that is driving the zealousness that you may have seen from Bitcoin Maximalist. I’m going to break that down and inform you about why I rejected piece by piece, and I’m going to go through an exhaustive list of items about why Bitcoin has a fatal flaws that I think will potentially take it long-term value to zero. Stay tuned and let’s get into it. Bitcoin has a huge market capitalization. It’s got like $1.3 trillion in market capitalization. Each Bitcoin individual Bitcoin is now worth about $65,000 at the time we’re recording this video. And Bitcoin people, bitcoin maximalist, as I refer to them through the rest of this recording here, really have a passion for it. And that passion in many cases leads to a total lack of tolerance, empathy, and almost an aloof overconfidence when discussing the subject among other people.
I noticed in a recent Facebook thread that when I said, Hey, I actually don’t invest in Bitcoin because I understand it. A lot of Bitcoin people were politely but kind of aloof, incredulous like, oh, really? You did your homework and understand Bitcoin? I don’t think so. I don’t think you fully understand it if you’re not investing in it. And I’m like, guys, I understand it and I reject it. I’m not like some ignorant guy who hasn’t done my homework or what this, I consider it part of my profession in my career to understand these concepts of personal finance. And today I’m going to lay down my view on why I don’t like Bitcoin and just to couch that again. Am I against it philosophically? No. We’ve had Dr. Sine Amus on the BiggerPockets Money Podcast, episode 3 71. He’s the author of the Bitcoin Standard. Fascinating.
I love learning about Bitcoin. It’s an awesome experiment. It’s an awesome thesis in what money ought to be. I think there’s a lot of things to really empathize with and admire about the people who invest in Bitcoin and the experiment that is Bitcoin and the blockchain and there’s special symbiosis. So I really am looking forward to getting into it. And obviously you can tell I’m very passionate about the subject. Bitcoin is a digital currency. It is intended to be a form of what Bitcoin Maximalist or people who subscribe to the Austrian School of Economics call hard money. So the rationale at the highest level is a Bitcoin. Maximalist will believe that inflation is a prime evil in today’s society. Inflation eats away at the earnings or the wealth created by laypeople who are not investors. For example, if you just hoard dollars, you know they’re going to be worth probably at least 2% less every year, and many Bitcoin maximalists will argue it’ll be worth much less per year, and that inflation rates are vastly understated.
Bitcoin Maximalist will talk about how hard money has benefited societies for millennia. They’ll point to the fact that societies that have used gold, for example, which they believe is a form of hard money, have benefited greatly from the fact that people were able to preserve their wealth and that eras where gold was money were really kind of golden ages for human society. So what makes gold a hard money? And I think that gold really understanding gold is absolutely critical to understanding the Bitcoin thesis. By the way, gold is hard money in the sense that you can’t create a lot of it. People have tried to create gold for millennia through the practice of alchemy, which has failed over and over and over and over and over again. Gold is an element, so it cannot be created or destroyed. Gold never rusts or decays, so it can infinitely preserve value.
Gold is very easy to melt and smelt into small components or bring together and make into coins or bars or other things there. It’s because it’s so rare and small, it’s relatively easy to transport and store. So in a lot of ways, gold is this ideal form of money. And civilizations over the millennia have a greed with this thesis. That’s why gold has been such an important form of money for so long throughout history and other forms of money have kind of come and gone over those times periods. So what Bitcoin maximalism is, is bitcoin. Maximalist believe that Bitcoin is almost like digital gold. It’s a version of gold, but better for the 21st century and beyond. Bitcoin’s a scarce resource. Only 21 bitcoins can ever be mined in a long-term future state. So that creates an inherent scarcity like gold. Bitcoin also has a very limited stock to flow ratio.
So there’s certain amount of Bitcoins that are in existence today, and only a small percentage of them, about one or 2% per year will be mined over the next 120, 140 years according to Bitcoin optimists until the last one is mined. So that’s going to create a low flow of these coins and make it very hard for there to be an increase in supply. And the Bitcoin Maximus will contrast this scarce resource with a fiat currency like the US dollar and say, Hey, the Federal Reserve can print money at a whim, right? And if the federal deficit goes up, the temptation to print money and inflate the way out of government problems is going to be very high, and the dollar is going to go down and down and down and down and down, and people will eventually turn to Bitcoin and that this will happen one society after another.
These governments are going to out print or print their currencies, print too much money and their currency, their value of their currencies will inflate and people will turn naturally to a much better alternative like a gold. Although Bitcoin Maximus believe that Bitcoin is the answer here. Another component to Bitcoin that Bitcoin Maximus think is really critical is these folks are often grounded in this very libertarian school of thought. So Austrian School of Economics, libertarianism, these folks believe that decentralization is better. And again, I empathize with some of these things. There’s lots to like here. I think that I am sure many of my friends are Bitcoin. I know many of my friends are Bitcoin maximalist. I would love to have discussions about these types of things and probably would agree on many of these issues. But the central tenet of decentralization is so critical to the Bitcoin thesis and its special symbiosis with the blockchain like gold, there’s a finite supply of bitcoins that can never be mined like gold.
Bitcoin is going to be very expensive and difficult to mine, very limited stock to flow ratio. Bitcoin like gold. Bitcoin can be broken out into tiny increments. 100 million Satoshis make up one Bitcoin. So you can divide Bitcoin by up to 100 million, making it a very powerful theoretical option for everyday transactions, for example. Now, unlike gold and better than gold, a Bitcoin Maximus will argue Bitcoin has the added advantages of being able to be transacted digitally. And that digital transaction takes place on a remarkably immutable, secure, and transparent ledger called the blockchain, which a Bitcoin maximalist, by the way, believes is a special purpose-built technology exclusively for Bitcoin. Bitcoin Maximalist actually are not big fans of blockchain technology, which people may have heard who aren’t familiar with this as like this saving grace for all these other applications. Bitcoin maximas believe that blockchain technology is only valuable for the application of Bitcoin.
And don’t worry, I’ll get into the blockchain later on this and we’ll no doubt plenty more as we get going here on that. So this leads us to our core thesis, right? Bitcoin maximalism believes that governments and societies that use fiat currency today will one by one succumb to the temptation to inflate their way out of their problems, and the people of those societies will turn to a better form of money. These governments and societies will be forced one by one to adopt Bitcoin as a hard money and in the not so distant future, Bitcoin will be money for most or all people in the world. So a Bitcoin Maximalist literally believes that the long-term value of Bitcoin is essentially that of all of the world’s outstanding currency, it’ll replace all dollars, all you want, all euros, all yen, every other currency you can imagine.
And that means that leads to a long-term market cap of tens of trillions of today’s dollars, maybe hundreds of trillions of dollars in future value, future inflated dollar there. And what’s more these Bitcoin maximas believe that this is good for society, that the common person is going to experiments, experience unimaginable wealth and benefits from this transition, that innovation is going to flourish, the economy is going to stabilize, and that without inflation to worry about, the common people are going to consume less leading to happier, more productive and more sustainable living. They think that governments will be forced to enter into sustainable fiscal policy as a result of this change, spending less than they take in, and that those that can’t are going to dissolve and reform. It’s like that’s the thesis, right? Bitcoin Maximus believe, invest in Bitcoin, watch the man collapse, make a nearly infinite return and do good for society, and what’s more it’s like, that’s awesome, right?
It’s a great thesis, it’s admirable, it’s cool, right? It’s libertarian and I completely respect the intention. I admire the detail and thought and intricacy of Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of Bitcoin, and it’s just fun to learn about and talk about this experiment in the path to perfect money. So I just want to couch that there’s no evil, there’s no bad intent, there’s no lack of intelligence. Bitcoin maximalist are zealous, but they’re not like evil. They’re not manipulating other people. They truly believe in this thesis. So that’s the philosophy behind Bitcoin. It’s a noble purpose. It’s designed to fix what the inventor, Satoshi Nakamoto thinks are real societal issues that we’re faced with today. And the technology is really cool and really ambitious. So you might be saying to yourself, okay, that sounds gravy. Let’s go buy some Bitcoin not so fast. After the break, I’m going to break down the reasons why I reject this thesis and do not invest in Bitcoin.
Welcome back to the show everybody. Before the break, I stepped into the shoes of a Bitcoin maximalist and tried to empathize. I’m now going to make the case for why rational investors should not invest in Bitcoin and why I don’t. First, at the end of the day, Bitcoin is intended to be a store of value, a digital currency money. I’m an investor. I don’t invest in currency. I keep the very minimum amount of currency that I need to secure my short-term liquidity needs and to sleep well at night. And then I invest the rest in cash flowing assets like real estate, stocks, businesses, and other debt or other private opportunities, even in a world with truly perfect hard money that was deflationary, I would put my capital to work trying to create real inflation adjusted wealth, not stored in Bitcoin and allow it to collect digital dust.
Second, I believe in the United States, it’s people, economy and military. I do not believe that it or its currency are going to collapse or decline in a relative sense. In my lifetime, I believe that I’m going to earn spend and pay taxes with dollars not bitcoins for the duration of my entire life. And not only that, but I believe that this will be true for everyone I know, for all of my kids, for all of their future descendants, for many generations I have and will continue to happily bet against anybody who wants to take the opposite stance and believe that believes that the US is going to fall. And I’ll do that by passively investing in low fee index funds. If I do that, I believe I’m going to passively absorb the wealth of almost everyone who invests in Bitcoin or otherwise predicts doomed day and the decline of western civilization in the United States.
Third, if I believed that the United States government and the US dollar was going to collapse or decline materially on the world stage, I’d invest in a bunker guns and ammo, canned corn and other resources like that, not Bitcoin. Fourth, if I did believe that the government of the United States would collapse and the US dollar would collapse without ending my way of life as I know it, I’d bet on another government controlled currency or future cryptocurrency replacing the dollar. Fifth, I believe that Bitcoin maximalist miss the fact that Bitcoin as a potential theoretical future currency has fatal flaws that make it an extremely unlikely candidate in the extremely unlikely event that the world does adopt a future reserve currency. Bitcoin has huge technical problems, and I think that a future iteration of Bitcoin, namely a future cryptocurrency that does not exist yet will likely resolve those issues.
Okay, let’s use it. I had a Bitcoin, maximalist challenged me on this thesis the other day, and they said, look at the British Empire. It has completely faded. It used to span the whole world. And I’m like, this is a terrible example. This is perfectly fitting into my rationale here. The great British pound has been used since seven 60 ad, so that is almost what, 1300 years of continuous use of a government currency over that time period. During some of that, it was backed by gold during some other times it wasn’t. But that currency has survived and so has that government. If you are a UK resident, you have lived your life and using great British pounds for the entire time. You’ll probably, whenever you pass away, your estate will still be using great British pounds, and your children and their children’s children will probably continue to be using those.
I believe that’s the same general state of the United States. The United States. Also, if we really want to get into it, I think we have a lot of advantages. We have a ton of problems, but every problem and advantage is relative on the world scale. We have a tremendous amount of abundant natural resources here compared to other large countries around the world. Our population segment is really stable. We have plenty of young people compared to places like China, Japan, Western Europe, those areas. We have immigration. People want to move to the United States from all around the world. So whenever we decide how we’re going to handle immigration, we will have a flow of people who want to be here and make their lives here. So those are not trivial advantages and like, yes, we have problems. We can’t agree on anything our government spends more than it brings in, but we have again, this very stable resource base and population base.
We also have the world’s strongest military, so it’s like what other country would you rather bet on? Long-term? It hasn’t been profitable to bet against the United States for the last 50 years, and I don’t think it’s going to be profitable to big against the United States in the next 50 years. And look, people are going to disagree with that. That’s totally fine. But don’t call me and the people who invest in stocks, us, us real estate ignorant because we don’t believe that the United States is going to collapse. I’m just happy to bet against you. I’m happy to bet against somebody who thinks that the world is going to collapse or Western civilization is going to collapse, and I believe I’m going to passively absorb your wealth over that time period. So Bitcoin is not just a potential store of value. It would actually be deflationary in a long-term sense, perhaps significantly so if the vision of a Bitcoin maximalist was realized, remember that Bitcoin supply is ultimately finite according to Bitcoin optimists who believe that it’ll be adopted as a world reserve currency, the last Bitcoin will be mined in 2140.
So once they’re all mined, the only thing that can happen is for the supply to decrease, and people will guard their precious resources in this future hypothetical state where Bitcoin has taken over and the last one has been mined very jealously, but still people will die, people will lose their keys that store the information about how to access and transmit Bitcoin. And so the supply will actually shrink over a long period of time, and that is going to compound this deflationary problem of no more mining, more, no more Bitcoins being mined here. I’m not aware of any democratic or capitalistic civilization that has endured with a deflationary currency over a long period of time, because if you truly do have a deflationary currency, it says that the best thing you can do is to hoard that currency and not to invest in assets and other things because the currency is what’s going up in value.
That creates huge problems here over a long period of time. I also want to call out that the incentive to mine Bitcoin, this act of securing the blockchain that is so critical and goes so hand in hand with the Bitcoin thesis. Where’s the incentive to continue expending this computing power on an individualized basis once the last Bitcoin is mined? So there’s an end game problem here for Bitcoin that there’s the various theories on how to solve, but I’m skeptical of at to a certain point, and I think that we’re going to see that problem emerge as Bitcoin mining as housing events happen for Bitcoin mining. Okay, second, Bitcoin transactions are super expensive and impractical for day-to-day use. So this is called the Bitcoin scalability challenge. And basically the problem is that because the blockchain requires so much computing power to secure transacting, Bitcoin is fairly expensive.
It actually costs about one to $3 to make a transaction on the blockchain here. And so the world does not possess and will not possess for the foreseeable future enough computing power for the blockchain to process anywhere near enough transactions to allow Bitcoin to be used as day-to-day currency. So if Bitcoin was widely adopted, the price to transact Bitcoin would skyrocket. Now, the community has proposed and implemented various solutions to this problem, each of which has pros and cons, but true decentralization and mass payment processing are still a long way off for Bitcoin, for Bitcoin users if it ever comes despite these increasingly clever mechanisms. And then I also want to call out, there’s another problem here where why was the world able to move off of a gold standard in the first place? Well, what happened here is the US government bought and world governments basically bought a lot of gold and then used that gold to back their currencies and then move their currencies to fiat.
That same scenario, there’s nothing that would exist to prevent governments from purchasing Bitcoin from their people in the event that, and then moving it back to a fiat currency at some future state, Bitcoin has no solution for that particular problem. Okay, next up, Bitcoin is not practical for most purposes going forward. So Bitcoin is super volatile right now and is going to remain very volatile, even according to Bitcoin optimists for the foreseeable future. That means that unless you’re really bold, you’re not going to put your down payment for your next house and buy Bitcoin to save up for that. You’re not going to buy Bitcoin to save up for your kids’ college fund. You’re not going to save up Bitcoin to buy Bitcoin to save up for your next vacation because of that volatility. You can’t save for a near term or objective that you know need that liquidity for in the next couple of years.
Again, unless you’re very bold, very few people are going to do that. Second, another one here is that Bitcoin is not widely accepted for payments or goods of services. I’m not going to accept my salary and Bitcoin, and I cannot easily use Bitcoin to purchase goods or services or pay my taxes to the US government. Again, I’m a US citizen. The people who do choose to accept Bitcoin as a form of payment often have problems with this, right? So if you receive payment in Bitcoin in 2024, for example, that’s worth a million dollars, and by the time you go to pay taxes in 2025 that Bitcoin is worth $500,000, you have a real problem on your hands from a liquidity perspective. So a lot of people have come into this problem and years past. Another problem with Bitcoin, Bitcoin’s a huge environmental concern. Bitcoin mining consumes an incredible amount of energy, and a large portion of the world’s population is not going to be aligned with adopting a currency with such large environmental consequences.
So while a small fragment of libertarians who again we can empathize with and admire in some cases may love this concept of decentralized currency, many more people are likely to be like, no, we’re not going to expend a ridiculous amount of computing to stabilize our currency. We’re comfortable with some centralization for this. Again, a lot of these issues are solvable in future state cryptocurrency iterations. So a bet on Bitcoin is also a bet against some future invention solving many of the issues that I just discussed. So yes, you can make some software updates and other variations to the blockchain to mitigate some of these issues, but there’s always going to be an easier perpetual flow of better theoretical alternatives to Bitcoin. In my opinion, I’ll keep going here. I also think that there’s just no such thing as a truly trustless marketplace. So even when I transmit Bitcoin to someone on the blockchain, I’m trusting them to deliver whatever good or service.
If I want to buy a pizza on the blockchain, I’m trusting somebody else to deliver me that pizza after I transmit Bitcoin, somebody has to enforce that contract. That’s a centralized government that has physical power. So this true decentralization vision, I think is unlikely to be ever realized in there. Bitcoin also does not prevent, contrary to what Bitcoin Maximalist will say, the booms and busts of modern economies or resolve the problems of fractional reserve banking, please look up fractional reserve banking. I would love to explain it, but that would take us down a big rabbit hole here. You can perform fractional reserve banking on any currency. So cryptocurrency investors learned this the hard way with the fall of major cryptocurrency exchanges like FTX, and these are lessons that the US financial markets experienced in the early 20th century that these new attempts at World Reserve currencies are finding out and discovering all over again the lessons learned from these other centuries are just being repeated in the cryptocurrency markets.
So I think that the vision of true decentralization and trustless transactions is unlikely to be realized or necessary any future point, and that while governments have collapsed and will continue to collapse, the new governments that emerge from those collapses are not necessarily going to turn to Bitcoin. Alright, if you’re still with me and you’re still not convinced after the break, I’m going to lay down the rest of my case. Welcome back to the show. And if you’re enjoying this, I want to dig in even more. I just want to let you know that I wrote an entire blog post getting into the nitty gritty of this. It’s at biggerpockets.com/bitcoin blog. Go read that and leave a comment on why you agree or disagree. Let’s discuss it. So next I want to talk about the blockchain, right? This is like a Bitcoin Maximalist aced in the hole.
Again, blockchain’s an accounting record of Bitcoin transactions from the beginning of time. Anybody can go at any time and look at the blockchain and see who currently holds Bitcoin and the entire history of transactions. When someone tries to send Bitcoin, the rest of the network collectively verifies the transaction. Instead of having a person like a central bank or like the Fed, an accountant or bureaucrat, we have the Bitcoin network verifies this transaction through a technical process called proof of work. So essentially, the network competes to solve a very difficult technical problem that requires a lot of computing power to prove, but once proven can be verified easily by the rest of the network, and they compete to solve this technical problem because the network rewards them with Bitcoin. That process is called Bitcoin mining. And this is what makes the Bitcoin network so secure is so many people from so many places around the world are competing to solve these problems, that there’s no one person that is needed to verify that a transaction is legitimate.
So to hack the blockchain, somebody would need an unimaginable computing power. They’d need more than 50% of the computing power currently being devoted to mining Bitcoin and securing the blockchain. So this is as secure a ledger as almost anything can imagine in the real world. It’s also the reason why Bitcoin mining consumes so much energy output more than 27,000 terawatt hours, which is more than many small countries last year. A true Bitcoin maximalist, again, does not believe that the Bitcoin is good technology for any other application because for example, in the medical record space, unless somebody is devoting a tremendous amount of computing power to maintaining a medical record blockchain, it’s in theory possible that someone with a really powerful computing network could hack that blockchain take over with more than 50% of the computing power and rewrite history, and that would be a problem.
So blockchain technology is only useful as a secure decentralized ledger in one application according to Bitcoin maximalism, which is money itself, Bitcoin as a single worldwide backed currency. And for the record, I agree with Bitcoin maximalism on this point. I think that true decentralized blockchain technology is not a useful secure, decentralized application for anything but a theoretical future state where Bitcoin is a world reserve currency. A couple of other items that I want to go through, sharp ratio Bitcoin Maximalist will talk about how great Bitcoin sharp ratio is. A sharp ratio is a way of measuring returns relative to risk. So Bitcoin Maximalist will talk about how Bitcoin has this incredible ratio of returns relative to risk. But this is kind of a silly argument in my view, because Bitcoin was worth zero when it was invented, and now it’s worth something. Anything that goes from zero to one has an essentially infinite sharp ratio, and so that allows anybody to conveniently look back at any point in over the last 15 years and make in many cases an argument for an incredible sharp ratio.
So don’t let someone use that gem of an argument and get away with it as a defense of Bitcoin. Another big point from Bitcoin people, the El Salvador experiment in 2021, El Salvador became the first and still the only country to make Bitcoin legal tender. So this is apparently a huge victory for Bitcoin enthusiasts. A clear point where, Hey, my thesis that world governments are going to collapse and turn to Bitcoin is being validated. Oops, two years later, less than 1% of central bank remittances in El Salvador were in Bitcoin. So it turns out the locals don’t really accept Bitcoin, and you’re absolutely going to need alternative forms of currency to enjoy a visit to El Salvador, although in some places, mostly tourists can enjoy the experience of using Bitcoin to pay for very highly marked up goods and services. So this has been widely documented, including a Bitcoin enthusiast.
It’s not exactly a shining example of how this is going to work. Okay, another point. The current valuation is not a endorsement of the future potential of Bitcoin. The fact that a currency that has this many problems is at all time highs is an indication of risk, not validation of a thesis. Okay? Now all that is my argument against Bitcoin. I want to concede one point to Bitcoin Maximalist here to close things out. So contrary to popular belief, Bitcoin is not really a good tool for criminals. Remember all of the secure applications of the blockchain and how clear and immutable ledger that is, well, for criminal transactions, that actually makes it remarkably easy for government agencies to track criminal activity and catch criminals. This has been widely documented, and people who are dealing drugs or using Bitcoin to transact on illegal activities are often caught using the blockchain fairly easily by government agencies.
So don’t walk away from today’s call thinking that Bitcoin is actually going to be a great tool for criminals only the most technically sophisticated and very smart folks who know how to hide things on how to really mask their activity and the blockchain are going to be able to get away with it long term. So all that said, I think that the long-term value of Bitcoin is zero. I do not believe that Bitcoin has a 1% or 0.1% or whatever probability weighting you want to give to it of replacing all of the world currencies or some of the world currencies in a long-term sense as legal tender as money itself. I don’t hold anything in Bitcoin. And again, I’m not saying that the Bitcoin maximalism thesis is wrong. I guess I kind of am saying that it’s wrong, at least for me from a belief standpoint.
But I’m not saying it’s crazy. It’s not like it’s not grounded in a reasonable school of thought. You have just know that if you’re going to invest in Bitcoin, you have to disagree with what I said. You have to ascribe some probability of the collapse or decline of major world governments and the replacement of their currency with Bitcoin to some non-zero probability, and just understand that that’s the bet that you’re fundamentally making and that a Bitcoin max most is fundamentally making. And I think that that leads me to a logical place. What should a rational person who’s racking into this video and saying, Scott, I disagree with you. I think there is a probability of investing in Bitcoin. What should you do? Well, my recommendation would be that you should treat Bitcoin as part of your cash world, right? Understand that it’s part of your cash world.
That could go to zero, or it could go up to some expense. But think about it as part of your cash position. So for example, if you had $120,000 in cash, you might consider putting 40 in US dollars, 40 in gold, and 40 in Bitcoin. If you subscribe to the belief that Bitcoin could take over as a future state world reserve currency to some degree, and that might help you achieve some of the goal of preserving that wealth in a relative sense and giving you some liquidity. But again, I believe that it’s much more likely that this runs the risk of a near or complete wipe out in the long run and extreme volatility in the short run. So I do not do that personally. Alright, if you got this far, I really appreciate you taking the time to listen to my impassioned speech on Bitcoin here.
I’ll point out that even if I turn out to be dead wrong and the Bitcoin takeover does happen without the collapse of my way of life as I know it, then I will just transition to taking my dividends and rental income in Satoshis instead of dollars. The real value of my collected rent and the dividends that I have in my portfolio will remain relatively constant even in that event where Bitcoin does take over. That’s the real value of the wealth that those companies and my rental properties are producing regardless of which currency or which form of money is flowing through the underlying assets. Just to remind everybody, again, thank you for listening. I welcome a rebuttal and debate on this topic. This is my view. It’s not the view of BiggerPockets, it’s not the view of the other people it host podcasts at BiggerPockets. It’s probably not the view of many in the community. We’ve had Dr. ine Amus on the BiggerPockets Money podcast, author of the Bitcoin Standard. We would welcome another guest in the future who wants to rebut many of the points I’ve made. Just don’t tell me that I haven’t done enough homework, please, because I’ll get really annoyed about it. I’ve done plenty of homework on this subject and I understand it. I’m happy for rational informed debate and disagreement though. So again, if you listen this far, thank you so much and look forward to seeing you in the next episode of the BiggerPockets Money podcast.

Outro:
BiggerPockets Money was created by Mindy Jensen and Scott Treach, produced by Hija Ed, by Exodus Media Copywriting by Nate Weintraub. And lastly, a big thank you to the BiggerPockets team for making this show possible.

Watch the Episode Here

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

In This Episode We Cover

  • The rational investor’s case against Bitcoin and why it’s NOT an investment
  • The reasons why Bitcoin could change society for the better (but probably won’t)
  • Five fatal flaws of Bitcoin that will stop it from ever taking over fiat currency
  • How adopting Bitcoin could lead to a crashing economy with no growth
  • The blockchain’s big problems and proof that the world isn’t ready to adopt cryptocurrency
  • Scott’s long-term Bitcoin price prediction that will shock Bitcoin maximalists
  • And So Much More!

Links from the Show

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Check out our sponsor page!

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.

Boost Your Cash Flow in 2024 with These “Self-Management” Tips

2024 Deals We’re Doing with High Cash Flow and Rock-Bottom Rates (4.75%!)

Want a low mortgage rate? We mean a really low rate—like 4.75% in 2024 low. What about half a million in profit on a sneaky development deal? Or, maybe you’d settle for a quick house flip that pockets you $55,000 on a bad day. These aren’t made-up numbers; these are REAL deals that our expert investing panel is doing in today’s hot, hot housing market. And if you know where to find deals and steals like these, you, too, could be taking home huge profits like they are! Thankfully, they’re sharing all their secrets on today’s episode!

David and Rob are taking some time off to play pickleball, while Dave Meyer and the entire On the Market podcast panel join us today! In this show, we’re talking about the real estate deals getting done in 2024. Each expert brings in a deal they’ve recently done and showcases how they found it, what they bought it for, how much cash flow or profit they’re going to make, and advice to help YOU repeat these home-run real estate deals.

First, Dave will share about a cash-flowing on-market rental property he bought (while abroad!) thanks to his inventor-friendly agent. Kathy Fettke gives tips on getting a low mortgage rate on your next new construction rental and how doing so could massively boost your cash flow. Henry Washington walks through a quick flip that will make him $55,000 on the low end and the ingenious way he found this deal. And finally, James Dainard talks about the almost unbelievably good development deal he’s doing in Seattle that will profit $500,000 (yes, that’s half a million!).

Click here to listen on Apple Podcasts.

Listen to the Podcast Here

Read the Transcript Here

Coming soon

Watch the Episode Here

https://youtube.com/watch?v=FK1AxBOQA70123

Help Us Out!

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

In This Episode We Cover:

  • How to score a mortgage rate in the four-percent range by buying new construction rentals
  • The three big housing market challenges of 2024 and how investors can overcome them
  • How to find cash-flowing, on-market rental properties by investing out-of-state
  • One of the smartest ways to find off-market real estate deals for flipping or holding
  • The one contract clause that is helping James make $500K+ on his new development deal
  • And So Much More!

Links from the Show

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.

Expedia adjusts full-year guidance amid slump in Vrbo bookings

Expedia adjusts full-year guidance amid slump in Vrbo bookings

The firm reported total lodging bookings of $21 million for the first quarter across all of its platforms.

At Inman Connect Las Vegas, July 30-Aug. 1 2024, the noise and misinformation will be banished, all your big questions will be answered, and new business opportunities will be revealed. Join us.

Vrbo parent company Expedia Group hit its earnings guidance for the first quarter of 2024 despite a slowdown in lodging bookings and a slow restart for Vrbo following a transfer to a different technology platform and a subsequent pullback in marketing, according to an earnings report released Thursday.

The firm reported total lodging bookings of $21.0 million for the first quarter across all of its platforms, which include Expedia, Vrbo and Hotels.com, a 4 percent increase from 2023. Revenue was at $2.9 billion for the quarter, an 8 percent bump from 2023.

“Our first quarter results met our guidance with a revenue and earnings beat but with less robust gross bookings,” Expedia Group CEO Peter Kern said in a statement. “However, Vrbo’s recovery following the recent re-platforming has been slower than anticipated, which has put pressure on gross bookings.”

The company registered a net loss of $135 million and adjusted net income of $29 million.

The slowdown in bookings inspired Expedia to lower its full-year guidance to single-digit top-line growth, with its margins expected to look similar to last year’s.

“Given the Vrbo drag and the rate of acceleration in B2C thus far, we are lowering our full-year guidance to a range of mid- to high-single-digit top-line growth, with margins relatively in line versus last year,” Kern said.

The company also said it plans to increase investment into the marketing of Vrbo to raise the platform’s profile.

“We had pulled back in Vrbo marketing in the second half of last year while we went through our migration,” Kern said during a conference call with investors on Thursday. “While we have been ramping that spend and the product has been improving, we have seen a slower-than-expected recovery based on this.”

The growth in bookings for the first quarter was driven primarily by hotel bookings,  which were up 12 percent during the first quarter, executives said during the call.

Email Ben Verde

Opendoor revenue dips and losses rise amid Q1 transaction slump

Opendoor revenue dips and losses rise amid Q1 transaction slump

At Inman Connect Las Vegas, July 30-Aug. 1, 2024, the noise and misinformation will be banished, all your big questions will be answered, and new business opportunities will be revealed. Join us.

A rough real estate market appears to have taken a toll on Opendoor this year, with the iBuyer experiencing a revenue dip and a rise in losses in the first quarter — though there were still some positive signs of hope.

In total, the company brought in $1.2 billion in revenue between January and March, according to a newly published earnings report. That’s down 62 percent compared to the same period in 2023. Net losses also mounted, with the company burning through $109 million in the quarter — up from $101 million in Q1 of 2023.

The falling numbers were driven by fewer transactions, with the report showing that Opendoor sold 3,078 homes in the first three months of 2024. That’s down 63 percent year over year.

The numbers reflect a punishing real estate market, with high rates leaving many consumers reluctant to either buy or sell homes.

However, Thursday’s report wasn’t all bad news for Opendoor. Though revenue was down year over year, the Q1 numbers were actually up 36 percent compared to revenue in the final three months of 2023.

In a similar vein, the total number of homes sold in Q1 was 30 percent higher than in Q4 2023. Such numbers suggest that while Opendoor still faces marketplace headwinds, it could be reaching a turning point.

Perhaps even more notably, the number of homes Opendoor purchased also spiked 98 percent year over year in the first quarter to 3,458 — though that number is down 6 percent from the final three months of 2023. In total, the company had an inventory of 5,706 homes at the end of the quarter.

Carrie Wheeler | Opendoor CEO

In the report, CEO Carrie Wheeler celebrated the results, saying that “our product continues to resonate with customers, as we more than doubled our market share year-over-year.”

“We entered the second quarter with strong momentum, and we are meaningfully ramping acquisitions in 2024,” Wheeler continued. “Led by our operating principles of focus, execution and results, we remain on track to durably rescale the business in 2024 while delivering Contribution Margin within our target annual range.”

The company’s shareholder letter added that market share also increased in Q1 relative to Q4 2023.

During a call with investors Thursday afternoon, Wheeler added that the company plans to increase home acquisitions each quarter in 2024.

Wheeler spoke to Inman later Thursday evening, noting that the big takeaways from the quarter are “double the acquisitions, double the market share” and “a massive win vs where we were a year ago.” She added that Opendoor has made “massive progress on regrowing the business.”

Opendoor stock inched higher Thursday in the lead up to the company’s earnings report, with shares trading for around $2 as markets closed. However, that is less than half of what shares were fetching at the beginning of 2024.

Shares fluctuated, but trended higher, in after-hours trading Thursday following the earnings report’s publication.

Credit: Google

The iBuyer had a market cap of about 1.4 billion as of Thursday afternoon.

Opendoor previously reported earnings in February. At that time, the company revealed that it brought in $870 million in revenue during the fourth quarter of 2023. That was a year-over-year dip of 70 percent. Despite the lower revenue, however, the company improved its net loss from $399 million in Q4 of 2022 to $91 million in the final three months of last year.

While speaking with Inman Thursday, Wheeler noted that among other things, the company is focused on increasing brand awareness, top-of-funnel expansion and growing partnership channels.

“With spreads coming down, we can afford to invest marketing dollars in a more efficient way,” she added. “Spreads” refers to a metric the company uses to calculate the profit it makes on the homes it renovates and sells.

Asked about mortgage rates, Wheeler said the company is taking a “market-neutral outcome; we’re not embedding luck into our planning.”

Aside from financial numbers, Wheeler spoke out in Thursday’s report about the National Association of Realtors’ recent commission lawsuit settlement. If approved, the settlement would see NAR pay $418 million and make various policy changes. For her part, Wheeler framed the situation in the report as potentially beneficial to Opendoor, which she described as “shaping the future of real estate.”

During her investor call, Wheeler also described the NAR settlement as “positive” and said that over the long term, it should “drive lower transaction costs.”

“We think this is net positive for consumers,” Wheeler said. “Anything that’s good for consumers is good for Opendoor.”

She also said it could result in “more transactions as commissions decrease.”

Speaking to Inman, Wheeler said she doesn’t envision a future in which buyers’ agents largely disappear. She went on to say that Opendoor’s priority is transparency and more consumer choice, which could increase in a post-settlement world.

“The proposed NAR settlement underscores a growing consumer preference for an alternative approach to the traditional home selling and buying process — one that gives them more control,” Wheeler added in the report. “As the largest digital platform for residential real estate transactions, Opendoor was built for this moment, and we remain steadfast in our mission to power life’s progress, one move at a time.”

Update: This story was updated after publication with additional details from Opendoor’s earnings report and with commentary from the company’s investor call. 

Email Jim Dalrymple II

The silver lining behind the market’s mixed messages

The silver lining behind the market’s mixed messages

While 2024 is looking like more of the same down market, leading indicators may point to happier days ahead, according to Mike DelPrete.

This article was shared here with permission from Mike DelPrete for Inman Intel, a data and research arm of Inman offering deep insights and market intelligence on the business of residential real estate and proptech. Subscribe today.

Compared to last year, new listings are up and existing-home sales are down — a tale of two metrics — but with a promising silver lining.

Why it matters: New-listing volumes are a leading indicator for existing-home sales, which typically lag by two to three months, meaning the current surge in new listings is a hopeful sign for the remainder of the year.

Data points: Compass has 35 percent more listings than the same time last year — a trend which has been steadily increasing since January — with about the same number of agents.

Nationally, new listings are up about 15 percent compared to last year, according to Redfin data (which measures all listings in a market, not just Redfin’s listings).

  • New listings aren’t quite at the levels of 2021 and 2022, but are well off the lows of 2023, meaning inventory is building.

But new listings are not yet translating into sales, which is reported monthly by the National Association of Realtors.

  • After a relatively steady start to the year, existing home sales in March were down 10 percent compared to 2023, and down 19 percent compared to the historical average.

For the first quarter of 2024, existing home sales were down 17 percent compared to the pre-pandemic historical average (2012–2019).

  • At this rate, total transactions for 2024 would end up at 4.3 million, up 6 percent from last year.

What to watch: I think it has something to do with interest rates.

  • But also keep an eye on days on market to make sure inventory isn’t just sitting on the market (sellers without buyers).

The bottom line: It’s a confusing time with mixed messages coming from the market, making it easy to spin whatever narrative you want (armageddon vs. a healthy recovery).

  • There’s no simple answer to what’s going on, just data: new listings are up significantly and sales are lagging.
  • 2024 will likely be another depressed year of activity, but the best leading indicator of future activity, new listings, is looking promising.