March 2025 Housing Market Update: Are Price Declines Coming?

March 2025 Housing Market Update: Are Price Declines Coming?

The housing market saw significant “softening” in February, with inventory rising, demand shrinking, and buyers regaining more control while sellers find themselves in a tough position. Why is this happening now, especially as mortgage rates continue to dip? With recession fears and economic tensions running high, Americans worry what’s coming next, causing much of the economy to shift. With price declines already happening in some markets and more potentially on the horizon, when is the right time to buy?

We’re back with a March 2025 housing market update, going over what’s happening in the national housing market, which states are seeing the hottest (and coldest) housing demand, what’s going on with mortgage interest rates, and why the market is noticeably softening.

But the real question remains: How can YOU continue building wealth while others fear the worst? Is this your “be greedy when others are fearful” moment? Dave is giving his take and sharing how he’s tailoring his own investing strategy in 2025.

Find investor-friendly tax and financial experts with BiggerPockets Tax & Financial Services Finder!

Click here to listen on Apple Podcasts.

Listen to the Podcast Here

Read the Transcript Here

Dave:
Your real estate buying window is open. Well, maybe that’s right. The housing market is softening after several years of supreme seller power. Potential price declines can be a boon for real estate investors looking to negotiate, but they also create risk if you buy at the wrong moment. So which way is the housing market heading and how can you take maximum advantage in your own portfolio? Today I’m giving you my March, 2025 housing market update. Hey everyone, it’s Dave head of Real Estate investing at BiggerPockets, and if you know me, I believe being a successful investor is about learning and continuously improving on your skills. Things like deal finding, tenant screening, managing rehabs, all that stuff is super important. But you also need to understand the broad trends that are happening in the housing market in order to optimize your portfolio to find the best deals and to avoid any unnecessary levels of risk.
For this reason, I like to provide a summary of what is going on in the housing market and I also like to provide my personal analysis and read on the situation. I’ll even tell you what I’m thinking about and doing with my own portfolio. This is for March, 2025. So trends may be different if you’re watching this a little bit further into the future. Now I want to just say that I’ve been analyzing the housing market for a very long time. I’ve been an investor for 15 years. I’ve been working at BiggerPockets for nine and right now things are changing pretty much as quickly as they ever have and that makes it more important than ever to understand what’s happening for your own portfolio and achieving your financial goals. Alright, so let’s talk about this softening market and what it actually looks like in the numbers and of course what it means to you.
Now if you look at certain websites like Redfin, you’ll see that home prices are up 4% year over year according to what data they have collected and when they seasonally adjust it. When you look at some of the other data sources, there’s a source called the Case Schiller Index and that uses a different methodology where it basically tracks how the price of the same home change over time. And what you see when you look at the case Schiller is it’s much closer to flat. And so we’re probably in somewhere in between those two. There’s no perfect measure, but we’re probably flat-ish housing prices maybe up a little bit depending on what market that you’re looking at. So that is by no means any sort of correction or crash at this point. It’s also not really exciting data in terms of appreciation, but I think the important thing here is that the trend is just really flat or a little bit down.
We’re not really seeing appreciation or price growth start to accelerate again. And so this is just one of the reasons I’m saying that the market’s flat. Now to understand if this trend is going to continue or if we’re going to see the market reverse in some sort of way, we to dig in a little bit deeper, go one level lower to try and understand why the market is somewhat flat. And I always talk about this, but we have to do it. We got to talk about supply and demand. That’s what dictates prices in the housing market. And so we need to see what’s going on with supply, which is just how many homes are for sale at any given point or how many people are listing their homes. And we got to look at demand. How many people want to buy homes? Let’s start with the supply side.
There’s really good data about this. It’s a little bit easier. So we’re going to talk first about something called new listings. This is a measurement of how many people put their properties up for sale in any given month, and that is up year over year. It’s up 6% according to Redfin, which is good in some ways, but it’s not crazy, right? We have seen really low inventory and to return to a healthier housing market, there need to be more properties listed for sale. And so having that go up, at least in the short term is generally seen as a good thing, but you have to look not at just how many people are listing their properties for sale. You also have to look at how long those properties are staying on the market because if they’re getting listed and going quickly, then prices can keep going up.
But if more things are getting listed this year than last year and they’re just sitting there and not really selling, then prices are probably going to go flat or go down because as property owners who want to sell their property are seeing their properties just sit there on the market week after week or month after month, they lower their price or they’re willing to offer concessions. And that’s what ultimately pushes prices down. And what’s happening right now is that active listings are up 10% year over year. And again, that’s not crazy because we have to look at the historical context here. So you might know this, but back in 2019, active listings were averaging somewhere around 2.3, 2.4 million. Then during the pandemic they went down to 1.6. We actually bottomed out at 1.1 million and although they’re going back up right now, they’re still at 1.5 million, they’ll probably go up over the summer and get somewhere close to 1.9 million.
So they’re going up, but they’re still not at pre pandemic levels. And that’s one of the main things as we talk about the housing market that you need to remember is when we compare what’s happening now to what was happening during the pandemic, it’s not the best comparison honestly, because what happened during the pandemic was just so unusual. So to say, oh my god, inventory has gone up compared to the pandemic. Of course it did because it was like at all time lows. I personally like to look at that still, but compared to 2019, and so we’re seeing things come back closer to pre pandemic levels, but we’re not there yet. And so this is the reason why I am saying that the market is softening. It’s back to where it was. I would even say it’s just sort of a normalization of the market, but because we’ve gotten used to this super heated market that’s very tight, there are not a lot of things on the market, there are still a lot of demand.
And so things are moving really quickly. That’s why I’m saying it’s softening because we’re just moving back to a more balanced housing market. So you definitely see that in the active listings numbers. You see that in some other data that you can look at for these things like days on market, those are going back up or months of supply. These are just other ways to measure the housing market. We don’t need to get into them today, but what you should probably know is that all of the measures of housing market health are just saying that we’re getting closer back to pre pandemic levels of the balance between supply and demand. Now of course, what I’ve been talking about so far is about the national housing market, but there are huge regional differences. We’re actually seeing a lot of signs that the market is kind of splitting. Some markets are growing in one direction, others are going in the other direction. So we’re going to break down those regional differences in just a minute. But first we have to take a quick break. And this week’s bigger news is brought to you by the Fundrise Flagship Fund, invest in private market real estate with the Fundrise Flagship fund. Check out fundrise.com/pockets to learn more.
Welcome back to the BiggerPockets podcast. We are here doing our March housing market update. Before the break, we talked about how a lot of the data suggests that the national housing market is moving to a more balanced market, a more buyer’s market, but that is not happening everywhere in the country. So let’s just take a minute here and talk about how inventory changes are different in different regions of the country. First things first, what you need to know is that every single state in the country is experiencing increases in inventory except North Dakota. North Dakota is down 2%, everywhere else is up. This is just year over year since 2024 in February to 2025 in February. And again, I’m recording this in early March. So the last month that we have data for is February. The state that has the highest shift in inventory over the last year is Nevada.
We see California at 44%, Arizona at 41%. Vermont is up there, Hawaii is near 50%. So that’s happening everywhere where if you want to know regionally where things are happening in the least, it’s mostly in the northeast and the Midwest. So I said North Dakota, that’s kind of an outlier, but New York for example, only up 3%. New jersey’s 9%, Illinois is 9%. So it’s sort of a continuation of the trends where the hottest or the strongest housing markets, I should say are in the Midwest and the Northeast. Some of the weaker ones are in the mountain west and west coast and the southeast as well. Georgia’s up 37%, Florida’s up 34%. That’s just at a state level. But given what I was saying before about the utility and usefulness of comparing data from this past year to the year prior, it’s helpful. We need to know it because you need to know how the market’s changing.
But I also like to provide this context of how things have changed since before the pandemic because that will really give us some clues about where prices are heading in any given market. And when you look at the data this way, it is very, very different. Remember I just said that everything’s going up year over year because it was super low. But when we look at how February, 2025 compares to February, 2019, it’s a pretty different story. We have certain markets where we are still nowhere even close to the levels of inventory that we were at in 2019. When I look at a state like Pennsylvania, it’s down 50%, still over 2019. Maine is down 61%. New Hampshire, 61%, Illinois, 63%, almost all of it is concentrated in the Northeast and the Midwest. So Wisconsin, Michigan, Virginia, all of these states are really down. Actually Alaska’s down too.
That’s kind of the only one that’s out there other than North Dakota. Again, those are sort of the most significantly down, but even throughout the rest of the country, most states are still down compared to pre pandemic levels. If we look at the Carolinas, California, Nevada, Washington, Oregon, all of them are still down. So that is sort of the big picture thing that you should keep in mind is that although inventory is returning, most states are still down compared to pre pandemic. So they’re still not back to what would be considered a normal market. There are four states, however that are above pre pandemic levels. The number one with the most inventory growth above pre pandemic levels is Texas. It’s 15% above where it was in 2019. Then comes Florida with 9% above Colorado at 7%, and Tennessee actually with 2% as well. So again, the regional differences really matter, and I’m talking about states.
I can’t get into every individual metro area on the podcast, it’s just too much to do. But what my recommendation for all of you is to look at these two things for your individual market because even within Texas which has rising inventory, there are certain markets and there are certain neighborhoods where inventory is still down. Or if you look at Pennsylvania, which has 50% declines in inventory, I’m sure there are still neighborhoods in areas where inventory is increasing. So I really recommend you look at two things in your market. Go and compare inventory levels right now in February of 2025 to where it was last year, see how much that’s growing and then compare it to 2019 and you’ll get a sense of how quickly the market is shifting from that really strong sellers market. That was kind of universal for years back to what would be a more normal sort of balance kind of market.
So what does this all mean? The stuff I said and the research you should probably be doing on your own as well. Any market where inventory is going up rapidly has the biggest chances of price growth slowing. And in some markets that mean it might go from 10% appreciation to 5% appreciation. In some markets that might mean six to two. Some markets it might mean going from flat to negative. And so it really depends on the scale of the inventory changes and what’s going on in your particular market. But as a whole, just going back, zooming back out to the national level, I do think that given inventory is rising and demand hasn’t picked back up, at least in the last couple of months, we are going to see further softening. And this is one of those reasons why I’ve said repeatedly that I do think prices will be maybe modestly up this year or somewhere near flat, especially when you compare those things to inflation, they might be a little bit negative based on the data that we’re seeing here today.
Now again, that is not going to happen in every market and what that means for real estate investors is not as obvious as you think. Declining prices are not necessarily a bad thing. A lot of people, I’d say maybe even most investors think that is actually a good thing. So we’ll talk more about what a softening market means, but we sort of have to address one other big thing before we get into what you should do next, which is of course mortgage rates. Mortgage rates have been in the news a lot and as of this recording, they’ve dropped down to 6.64% for a 30 year fix, which is down nearly 0.6% from where they were. They had shot up all the way to 7.25%. They’ve come down a lot and that is generally good news for real estate investors. But of course the reason this is happening is because there is bad economic news.
So we have to dig into this a little bit and sort of unpack what’s happening and what this means. So why have rates fallen so much over the last couple of weeks? We’ve talked about this in other episodes, you can go hear about it in further detail, but we’ve seen a bunch of soft economic data. The first thing was we had low consumer sentiment. We actually had the biggest month over month drop in four years. It’s not like this is going crazy, it’s lower than it was over the last few months, but it’s pretty much in line with where it’s been from 2022 to 2025. But after the election, consumer confidence had been growing and that has reversed itself over the last couple of weeks, and that decline in consumer confidence worries investors. And so we’ve seen some weakness in the soft market. I’ll get to that in a second.
The other thing that we’ve seen is an uptick in unemployment claims. There are lots of ways to measure unemployment. This is one I like to measure because it basically looks at the number of layoffs. And so we’ve seen layoffs start to tick up. Again, nothing crazy, but these are just small things that start to spook the market, right? And what we’re talking about when we talk about mortgage rates is essentially how bond investors and stock investors are reacting to all this news. And right now, given the level of uncertainty in the world, given the level of uncertainty in the markets, people are very sensitive. They’re reacting pretty dramatically back and forth to all the news that they’re getting. And so little changes in unemployment claims, little changes in consumer sentiment are probably impacting markets more than they would if this was 10 years ago in the middle of just a normal economic cycle.
So that is two things that are happening. And so there’s actually one thing that has happened over the last just two weeks that I think has further spooked investors, not tariffs. Those are sort of obvious. That is definitely something that’s been weighing on people’s mind. But something that I think got lost in the shuffle over the last few weeks is that there is this tool called the GDP Now tool. It’s put out by the Atlanta Fed, and it basically predicts where gross domestic product is going to go for the current quarter that we’re in. If you don’t know what GDP is gross domestic product, it’s basically the total measurement of economic output and it’s super important, right? If the economy is growing, that’s generally a good thing for the United States. If the economy contracts, that means people’s quality of life spending power is generally going down.
And anyway, what happened was the Atlanta Fed tool, which has proven to be very accurate historically, has changed its prediction. Just two weeks ago it was predicting 2% growth for GDP, which is not great. It’s not like an amazing quarter, but it’s not bad. It’s kind of just like a normal kind of quarter. It basically plummeted and the estimate now went to about negative 2.5% and has held there for three consecutive weeks. And so now they’re predicting that GDP is actually going to decline here in the first quarter of 2025, and that is super significant for all the reasons that I just mentioned. So between softer consumer sentiment and uptick in unemployment claims, softer GDP projections, uncertainty around tariffs, this has just basically spooked investors and it has led to a large stock market selloff. We’ve seen the NASDAQ was down 10% at certain points, which is correction territory.
That’s a significant decline. We’re basically seeing the entire boost in the stock market that we saw after the Trump election erased we’re back to basically where we were before the election. And what happens for real estate investors for mortgages is when people sell off their stock market, typically what they do is they take their money and they put it in bonds. And I’m not talking about me. If I sold off some of my stock, I probably wouldn’t go do this, but we’re talking about the big money movers. People who manage pension plans or hedge funds, they need to put that money somewhere. And so when they take it out of stock market, they typically put it into bonds because they’re seen as safe when they’re spooked about what’s happening in the stock market or the economy as a whole, they take the money, they put it in bonds, and that increases demand for bonds because everyone wants them.
And that pushes down yields, right? If a lot of people want to lend money to the government, the government can borrow that money at a lower interest rates. That’s yields coming down. And since yields and mortgage rates are almost perfectly correlated, that will take mortgage rates down with them. And so that is why mortgage rates have come down. Of course, no one knows for sure what is going to happen, but I’ll give you at least my opinion and what I’m thinking about and doing with my own portfolio. But first, we have to take a quick break. We’ll be right back. If you’re eager to get started in real estate investing, a smart first step is to partner with an investor friendly financial planner who can help you get your house in order and ensure you’re set up for financial success from the get go to biggerpockets.com/tax finder to get matched with a tax professional or financial planner in your area.
Welcome back to the BiggerPockets podcast. We are here doing our March housing market update and where we left off, I was going to try and make sense of this whole situation and share with you what I think this all means. Now, all the data, everything that I’ve shared with you, the future and direction of the housing market to me is really about economic sentiment. And that basically just sucks because it’s hard to predict, right? I’m sorry, but I know other influencers, creators, they’re going to tell you definitively what’s going to happen, but they’re misleading. I’m an analyst and the only thing I can tell you with certainty is that right now things are particularly uncertain and that’s the most important thing to remember. It is okay for your investing thesis or hypothesis to be that it is uncertain. It is better to admit that than to act on a false interpretation or false certainty because you don’t really know.
But here’s how I am personally seeing this. It seems to me that economic pessimism is gaining steam and people will have different opinions about what’s going to happen in the future. I am looking at data, I’m looking at trends, and this is what the data shows. It shows that investor confidence is down, the stock market is turning, the housing market is starting to soften, and does that mean we’re going to a recession? I don’t know. I think it is far too early to say that the GDP now thing is just one estimate, but I’m just telling you that the change from where we were in January to where the data was in February is pretty significant. There was a lot of economic optimism in December and January that has shifted in February and it might shift back, but right now it does feel like economic pessimism is gaining steam.
And for me, there are a couple things to take away from this. The first thing that has been coming to my mind recently is if we enter in a recession, and again, that is a big if, but something I’ve been thinking about is could this shape up to be what is sort a classic economic cycle where real estate is the quote first in first out, if you haven’t heard of this, there’s this pattern that has existed in a lot of recessions in the past where things are going off great, we’re in an expansion, businesses are booming, the stock market’s going up, everything is great, people are taking out debt. At a certain point, the economy starts to overheat and that leads to inflation. At that point, the Federal Reserve raises interest rates, right? Sound familiar? This is what’s been going on. And when the Federal Reserve raises interest rates, it impacts real estate first.
And I’m not saying this just because this is a real estate podcast, but real estate is just basically the most leveraged asset class. And actually as we’ve seen over the last several decades, it’s become really sort of on its own in how leveraged it is, which basically means it uses the most debt. And sure people take out debt to finance buildings and manufacturing and expansions for businesses, but real estate is really highly leveraged. And so you see real estate bear the brunt of a recession actually before everything else. And if you’re in this industry, you’ve been probably saying this and screaming that we’re in a real estate recession for the last two or three years, transaction volume has been down, prices have been largely flat, right? We’ve sort of been in a real estate recession for a while. But what’s been amazing is that other parts of the American economy has remained resilient despite these higher interest rates.
And for one reason or another, maybe that resilience is cracking right now and it’s reverting back to what we would’ve expected that the rest of the economy is starting to feel some of the pain of higher interest rates. So that’s sort of the classic start of a recession, right? Real estate comes first and then the rest of the economy comes second. But then what happens when the rest of the economy starts to slow down? Well, the Federal Reserve wants to stimulate the economy. They’re no longer as afraid of inflation, so they lower interest rates, and that gives a stimulus first to real estate, right? Because it is a leveraged asset class. So as those rates start to come down, it kickstarts economic activity, particularly in the real estate section, and that can actually help lead the entire economy out of a recession. And real estate is big enough.
It is a big enough part of our economy to both help bring the economy into a recession. And out of it, it’s estimated to be about 16% of GDP. That is huge for any one industry. Now, if you’re thinking that’s not what happened in 2008, that is definitely true. It’s sort of the exception to this pattern, and we don’t know what’s going to happen. But the belief among most economists is it didn’t happen in 2008 because unlike this current time in 2008, housing was the problem. That’s what created the recession in the first place. Whereas right now, housing is not the problem. Housing, a lot of the fundamentals are fundamentally sound. What’s going on with housing is really a reaction to interest rates. And so what I see emerging is potentially this first in first out situation. That is probably what I think is the most likely scenario as we’re looking at it today.
I think there are two other things that are possible that I’ll just mention, but I think they’re less likely. So the second thing that can happen is maybe this is just a blip in economic data and there’s actually going to be strong growth and people regain their confidence, in which case we’ll probably see mortgage rates go back up a little bit. I don’t know if they’re going to go back up to 7.25, but they’ll probably go back up again. In which case, I think the housing market will continue on its current softening trajectory. Again, I don’t think that means a crash. It probably means corrections in certain markets where other markets are going to keep growing. But I think we’ll continue on the trend that we’ve been on for the last couple of months. So that is a second possibility. It’s not that unlikely, it just doesn’t seem like the most likely scenario.
And then the third one, I don’t think this is so likely right now, but actually when you look at some of the data, there is a little bit of risk right now of what is known as stagflation. And again, I don’t think this is what’s happening just yet, but I just want to call it out because it is possible. Stagflation is when the economy slows down, but inflation is going up. This is basically the worst case scenario for the economy, but we have seen inflation go up a little bit then it’s sort of flat, so it’s not super concerning just yet. But there is a world where inflation goes back up due to tariffs. And the GDP now tool is correct and GDP declines, in which case we would have a really difficult economic situation where the economy is contracting, but inflation is going up, and that’s basically the worst case scenario.
Spending power is going down, but wages aren’t going up, the stock market is going down. And so although that is possible, I wouldn’t worry about that just yet. It’s just something that I wanted to mention that we’ll keep an eye on in the next couple of months. So as we do these updates every single month, I will update you and let you know if that’s a concern. There is some data trends that suggest it’s possible, but I think we’re still a far way off from concluding that that is happening. So let’s just go back to what I think is the most likely scenario, which is kind of this first in first out situation with real estate. Does that mean that it’s potentially a good time to buy real estate, right? Because don’t get me wrong, when markets are softening like they are, that comes with risk.
There is further risk that prices are going to decline. And I’ve said it before, but there is a lot of garbage out there. There’s a lot of bad deals, overpriced stuff out there, and things could get worse before they get better. But there is also a case that in at least some and maybe many regional markets that a buying window may emerge. Think about the conditions that we might have over the next couple of months. More inventory coming on the market leads to price softness, which gives you negotiating leverage, right? Because if you know that prices are soft and they might be declining more, that is something that you should be using in your bid strategy. And when you’re offering on properties, try and buy below asking price or what you think the market might bottom out at. So that gives you negotiating leverage. Remember I said softening it sounds scary, but that actually means we’re in a buyer’s market.
Buyers have the power. So that’s one good thing you might not want to buy even in a buyer’s market, if you think that that buyer’ss market’s going to continue for a long time and we’re going to have this sort of protracted period of prices going down. But remember that prices have been largely flat or growing modestly over just the last couple of years. And so we’ve seen this for a while. And if the current economic mood is correct and that we are going to see a contracting economy, that means that rates might stay as low as they are now and they could go down a little bit more. And if that scenario happens, that could bring demand back into the housing market. People often think that if the economy is doing poorly and there’s a recession that causes lower housing demand, but that is not always the case.
Housing demand is almost always tied to affordability. And so yes, if you don’t have a job, you’re not going to be going out there and buying a home. But for people who feel secure in their jobs, this might actually lead to better housing affordability. If the market softens and rates go down, that means more people are going to be able to afford more homes. That drives up demand and could actually reignite price appreciation in the housing market. That’s not what happened in 2008, remember, that is an outlier. But this is what often happens. So it’s something I’ll be keeping a close eye out for, and I recommend you do too. Personally, I have been looking for deals. I’m always looking for deals. I haven’t found anything so far yet this year. I’ve offered on some, haven’t been able to make it work, but I am maybe strangely optimistic about the potential for deal flow over the next couple of months and in the second half of this year.
I think that right now, we’ve been talking a lot this year about this potential for upside. And while there is risk, don’t get me wrong, there is risk in these kinds of markets. That upside is there and might even actually be growing throughout 2025 because if rates do come down and you have the opportunity to negotiate better prices on houses, that could set the stage for really good upside and future growth. So that’s how I’m seeing it. I would love if you’re watching this on YouTube to let us know how you are interpreting this housing market and what decisions you are making about your own portfolio. Thank you all so much for listening to this episode of the BiggerPockets podcast. I hope this housing market update was useful to you. We’ll see you next time.

Watch the Episode Here

Help Us Out!

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

In This Episode We Cover:

  • Why the housing market is starting to noticeably “soften” in 2025
  • Hottest/coldest housing markets in the United States with the most/least inventory
  • Are price declines coming? Whether we’ll end this year with negative price growth
  • Why mortgage rates are dropping, but housing demand isn’t rising
  • Why real estate could be the “First In, First Out” investment of 2025’s wild economy
  • Whether or not now is the time to buy and what could cause a reversal of these worrying trends
  • And So Much More!

Links from the Show

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

March 2025 Housing Market Update: Are Price Declines Coming?

5 Things You Can’t Afford to Get Wrong When Analyzing Deals (Rookie Reply)

Anyone can analyze a rental property, but if you’re not careful, it’s easy to overlook significant costs that wipe out your cash flow and put you in the red. Thankfully, we’ve got some timely tips that will help you avoid these critical mistakes!

Welcome to another Rookie Reply! Ashley and Tony are back with more questions from the BiggerPockets Forums and BiggerPockets Facebook groups. Worried that your “good” real estate deal might not be a good deal after all? We’ll show you some of the things you must account for before you buy! Next, we’ll discuss the ins and outs of real estate partnerships. Whose name should go on the mortgage? How do you ensure that both parties own the property? We have the answers!

Finally, how do you make an offer on a property you haven’t seen? What if you receive a low appraisal? We’ll show you how to find “boots on the ground” in any market, renegotiate with the seller, and close on your property for a great price!

Looking to invest? Need answers? Ask your question here!

Click here to listen on Apple Podcasts.

Listen to the Podcast Here

Read the Transcript Here

Ashley:
Investing out of state can be scary, but we will break down the steps to make your investment a confident one.

Tony:
We’ll also cover what exactly you need to account for when analyzing a deal, along with determining the best partnership for you.

Ashley:
Okay, so we got our first question on rookie reply today. This question is, when looking at the closing disclosure and you see that rent will only cover the taxes and mortgage, if the property management fee is waived for a year, is that worth it? That would mean that the next year after the property management fee is not waived, then you’re only getting about $50 in cashflow. Would that be worth it in a not so appreciating market? So here’s some things to consider for this question. The person row, absolutely nothing else is factored in such as Cap X improvements like roofs, HVACs, usually we like to save a percentage of that, so that’s great that they called that out. They also noted this is for a turnkey provider who is providing the property management who is saying they will waive one entire year for the rental, which could be increased by only a certain amount due upon the next lease renewal. This is also a single family home in the Midwest. The rent cannot be increased right away, so I would only receive $50 cashflow after the insurance taxes a mortgage. This would not include any maintenance. Pretty much the only reason why would be anything more than $50 is because the property management fee is waived, but that’s only within the first year. Okay, so to kind of sum up this question is, is it worth it? Should they purchase this property? Tony, should we start out with kind of explaining what a turnkey provider is?

Tony:
Yeah, it’s a great call. So turnkey providers, and I believe we recently did a reply specifically about turnkey, but turnkey providers are companies who go out there, they find distressed assets, they fix them up, they place sentence inside of them, and then they sell those fully leased up units to other investors. Those are called turnkey providers because basically on day one it’s turnkey. You don’t have to do anything to it, any work, and you can really just kind of get started cash flowing on day one, hopefully. So that’s what a turnkey is. But sometimes the downside with turnkey, which is what I think we’re seeing in this situation is that your cashflow, depending on the property, depending on the market, depending on the provider, can get a little squeezed, which is 50 bucks is I think is what we’re seeing here.

Ashley:
So the next kind of question here is, well, I guess we should kind of go over expenses. What other expenses should be considered? So they mentioned that any kind of savings for CapEx, such as roofs, avac, HVACs, anything like that is not included in their numbers. So for me, a general rule of thumb is how old the property is, or if it’s been recently remodeled, saving a certain percentage. So if I’m buying a home that was built in the early 19 hundreds, hasn’t had a lot of updates or remodeling, I’m saving at least 10% to cover those improvements on the property. If it was completely remodeled, I’m may be saving 5%. Some situations, like if I did the remodel and I updated a lot, then maybe it’s only going to be knocked down to 3% of whatever the rental income is each month. But you want to factor these things in along with the maintenance.
He had mentioned any maintenance cost would basically take away that $50 of cash flow. And if you have ever had a handyman or a service tech come out, usually just for them to come out to your property is more than $50. So yeah, the maintenance, maintaining the property, so this is a single family home, so most often you’re going to have the tenant take care of the lawn care, the snowplowing, things like that. But there could be pest removal that you may have to cover or pay for depending on what the lease agreement says too. Tony, is there any other expenses that you would add? I think the last thing I can think of is bookkeeping expenses. Unless your property management company is taking into account those expenses.

Tony:
Yeah, I feel like you kind of hit ’em all right. At a business level, I think you’re right, bookkeeping tax preparation and tax filing tax strategy, if you have an LLC, any fees associated with that. So there’s always going to be some additional cost. So I mean is $50 in cashflow a lot? Obviously not. I don’t think anyone’s going to retire or get super excited off of $50, but I think the one thing we don’t have from the person answering or asking this question is why are they doing this? They’re in the Midwest. So my assumption here is that they’re not hyper-focused on appreciation. Typically in most Midwestern states, those aren’t the states that are known for appreciating. They’re typically known for better cashflow. So if you’re going into the Midwest with the focus of getting cashflow, but yet you’re only getting $50, I can’t imagine what your investment into this property is, but it would has to be a pretty small investment for that 50 bucks per month to be any sort of reasonable return on your investment.
So just from that information, that doesn’t seem like a deal to me. And the other thing too actually that I’m curious about is for the PM two waive their property management fee in the first year, obviously it’s the turnkey provider, so they’re getting money upfront just from the sale of the property to this investor. So I get that piece, but I also wonder is there any sort of long-term contract that this investor is signing up for? Because I would assume that most pns probably aren’t just going to manage for free without any sort of security that they’ll have that second year, that third year potentially. So I would think I would really just review that to make sure, because what happens if you get into year two and that first year was kind of shaky and you’re like, man, I really did not like working with these guys, but now you’re locked in for another two or three or five years. So just a couple of things that are running through my mind as I hear this question.

Ashley:
Yeah, I definitely agree. I don’t think this sounds like a great deal, especially if you’re not getting appreciation. Maybe you need this property for the tax advantages and that’s all you care about is you want to be able to write it off, then maybe it could work for you. But I think if you’re not getting cashflow or you’re not getting appreciation, but definitely do your research on that and see if there is an appreciation play. Also, when can the rents be increased on the property or is there any kind of value add that you could do? For example, turning the dining room into another bedroom to actually increase the revenue that way? Could you rent out the garage for storage? So see if there’s any other revenue potentials, but I would say this probably isn’t an investment that I would want to do. One thing to keep in mind, if this is the only way that you can get started is by going through turnkey provider, I would go and talk to other turnkey providers and compare what their closing disclosures look like, compare what are the costs that are associated with using them, what are they charging, things like that.
So you can compare the different turnkey providers to, okay, we have to take our first ad break, but we will be back shortly.

Tony:
All right guys, welcome back. We are here with our next question in today’s rookie reply. So this question says, BP community, I’m entering the real estate investing world through partnerships. Ding, ding, ding. Alright, Ashley and I love talking about partnerships. Myself and my buddy, we’ve been friends for more than 15 years and we decided to get into real estate through a multifamily house hack. We plan on pooling our money for a down payment and closing costs. If one of us can qualify for the loan amount, then we’ll choose to only have one person apply for the mortgage. So the first question is, how does the other claim ownership on the property? My understanding is that this can be done by keeping the property in an LLC and being 50 50 partners in the LLC. Are there any other ways to claim ownership without the LLC?
What is a better way to go about this? Question number two, if we plan to buy a second property one or two years down the road, how would lenders approach the underwriting? And then question number three, do we need to watch out for any pitfalls in the future for scaling our portfolio together or separately? Lots of good questions here Before I think me and Ashley jump in. We got to give a nice plug here for our book on real estate partnerships. So for those that don’t know, Ash and I co-authored a book with BiggerPockets called Real Estate Partnerships, and you can head over to biggerpockets.com/partnerships to pick up a copy of that book. So Ashley, let’s hit the first question here, or first part of this question. If one person is on the mortgage, how the other person actually show ownership of the property?

Ashley:
So for this, I think there’s different ways that you can do it. We can kind of go into that as to how to structure is it should be in your personal name, should be in an LLC joint venture. But the way that you own the property is if you are on the deed. So you could not be on the mortgage, but you could still be on the deed. So whether you have ownership of an LLC or you have a joint venture agreement, or it’s your personal name, you need to have your name on the deed or that joint venture agreement saying that you are own part of the joint venture that owns the house. Okay, so that is how you claim ownership is having a right to the deed of the property, making sure that you’re on the deed. In this situation, this property is a house hack that they are doing together.
There’s one thing you should be cautious of. When my sister was doing her house hack, I couldn’t give her money for the down payment and say that she had to pay me back. You have to use your own funds or it has to be a gift from somebody and it has to be a family member usually. So just because you’ve been friends for 15 years, I’m not sure a standard FHA loan or conventional loan would allow if this is your primary residence for the funds to be provided by somebody else to actually close on the property, they’ll want to verify. Tony, do you know if that’s true for conventional or is that just an FHA rule that you have to use your own funds for a down payment or a gift from a family member?

Tony:
And guys, when we say conventional, we just mean anything that’s backed by Fannie and Freddie, right? The big, they’re not technically government entities, but the people that insure a lot of these mortgages that are going out to the general public. I think one of the things you made a phenomenal point ash about the mortgage and the deed being different, just one thing because they also said that, should we put this in an LLC? Just word of caution, or maybe not word of caution, but just something to think about. Typically when you’re doing a house act, the reason that people like to house act is because of the type of debt that you get access to. And Ashley just talked about that I like using an FHA, but with those types of debt, typically it’s got to be in your personal name. So even if you guys created this LLC, you can still a lot of times run the income and the expenses through that entity. But the actual deed would show Ashley and Tony, right title would be us jointly on that deed together. So I don’t know if the ownership in the LLC is necessarily going to impact the ownership claim on this property.

Ashley:
And I guess really you have to figure out how you want to finance the property because that’s going to really play into what you’re actually able to do. So if you’re both doing the house hack, if you both want this to be your primary residence, which I don’t remember, does it say they’re both to live in there?

Tony:
I believe so. It seems that way.

Ashley:
Yeah. So if you’re both living there, then I don’t see a problem with you both splitting the down payment, you both going onto the deed, you both being, you can have one person on the mortgage. So even with my sister’s house hack, I’m on the deed, but I’m not on the mortgage and I gifted her the down payment fund. So you can definitely do it where you’re on the deed and you’re not on the mortgage with one of you if one person qualifies. And I really like that strategy that you’re going to try and do it that way. Just make sure you have some kind of agreement where it states that you both are responsible for the mortgage because whether it’s you or the other person that’s putting the debt in their name, ultimately if someone doesn’t pay you, say the mortgage is in your name and your friend or whatever stops paying, it’s going to be you personally that the mortgage is going to go after and say they foreclose on the house. You’re both losing out on the house, but it’s going to affect your credit score and hurt your credit if mortgage payments are missed. So make sure you have some kind of protection or security against that too, or you really, really trust the person.

Tony:
And I think that kind of ties in nicely to the second part of this question. So it’s like if we plan to buy a second property one or two years down the road, how would lenders approach the underwriting? So like Ashley mentioned, if one person is on the mortgage, both of you’re on the deed, one person’s on the mortgage, both of you’re on the deed. When you go to get that next property, even though both of you’re on the deed, only the person who’s on the mortgage only their debt to income will be impacted by this first house S act. So if Ashley and Tony buy a duplex together, but it’s just Ashley who’s on the mortgage, we’re both on the deed. When we go to buy that second property, my DTI is going to show zero in terms of mortgages and Ashley will show the house act that we have together.
Now, say both of you go on the mortgage together because maybe you can’t qualify by yourselves when you go to buy that next property, since both of you’re on the mortgage, and actually check me if I’m wrong here, but since both of you’re on the mortgage, underwriting doesn’t split that in half. If the mortgage is 2000 bucks, it doesn’t say, okay, Ashley’s liable for a thousand bucks per month and Tony’s liable for a thousand bucks per month. It says Tony’s liable for 2000 bucks per month and Ashley’s liable for 2000 bucks per month, even though both of you are sharing that cost. And the reason why is because the lender who’s doing the underwriting, they’re like, well, we don’t know who this other person is, right? Even though both of you guys technically apply together, they’re like, we don’t know who this other person is. You are always responsible at the end of the day for making sure that mortgage payment is made. So that’s why it is very, it’s helpful if you guys can get approved individually, otherwise you’ll both get double dinged for those mortgages.

Ashley:
Yeah, that’s 100, correct. So it kind of stinks because now that’s being accounted against both of you. So if you do go and get another property, they’re looking at it as you both are responsible for $2,000 each instead of a thousand and a thousand. So it can affect your debt to income on the property. And then the last question here is do we need to watch for any pitfalls in future for scaling our portfolio together or separately? So the thing that I would want to have in place is some kind of operating agreement or joint venture agreement. Even if you are doing this in your personal name, have some kind of agreement in place where you are writing out what happens in the future. And Tony, I always use what you have done as an example, as in when you take on a partner, you put in there a five year exit plan. So do you want to explain to everyone what that is and how this person should use this to protect themselves from many falling outs or pitfalls?

Tony:
Yeah, the five year exit plan I think is one of the smartest things we’ve done in our real estate business in terms of partnering with other investors. Again, part of the way that we built our portfolio was finding really good deals and then soliciting those deals to folks that we felt might be good partners for us. And a lot of these people we’d never met before, these are people who we would meet in different places through different means. So even though we had a good initial conversation, who knows if down the road we would enjoy continuing to work together? So that was the genesis of the partnership kind of five-year clause. So basically what it states is that at the end of the fifth year of the partnership, the default option, the kind of default action that needs to be taken is that we sell the property. The only way that the cell is avoided is if both parties, both partners agree to extend for another year and then 12 months later the same thing happens. So every year, thereafterwards, we have another opportunity to reevaluate that partnership to see if it makes sense to move forward. We actually haven’t needed to leverage that at all yet. Most of our partners that we have are actually pretty solid people. But it is good to have just in case things do go south, there’s an easy exit for both of you.

Ashley:
Rookies, we want to thank you so much for being here and we are so close to hitting 100,000 subscribers on YouTube. We would love it if you aren’t subscribed already, if you would head over and find Real Estate Ricky on YouTube and follow us. We have to take one final ad break and we’ll be back after this. Alright, let’s jump back in. Okay, today’s last question is, Hey all I am just getting started and in my first deal I offered more than what the property appraised for. What should I be looking at when trying to consider an appropriate offer, especially if I can’t see the property since I’m investing out of state? Okay, making an offer. How do you figure out what the property is worth and then to find that disappointment of the property not appraising. So let’s kind of work through this process here.
You put an offer on a property, the offer is accepted. Usually there will be a contingency if you’re using financing that you can back out of the contract if the bank will not lend you the amount that you stated you’re borrowing. So if you put in your contract, you’re borrowing, you’re doing 80% conventional financing with the bank. If the bank says we’re only going to lend you 70%, that can be sometimes a way to get out of your contract and the contract falls apart. There’s also a spot too that your agent could fill an interest rate. So if the interest rate, if you put has to be below 6%, obviously it has to be something reasonable or else the seller is probably not going to sign it. But if all of a sudden overnight interest rates jump to 10%, you could say, look, the bank can no longer give me that rate.
I am going to get out of the deal. So this can also go for what the property appraises for. So the bank goes and does an appraisal on the property to see its value, and then it says, okay, it appraised for a hundred thousand dollars. We are doing a conventional loan of 80%, so we will lend you 80,000. Well, if the bank says, you know what? It only appraised for 90,000, so we can’t give you that 80,000, that’s when you have to make the decision, are you going to come up with the rest of the money? So make a bigger down payment on the property? Are you going to try to renegotiate with the sellers of the property or are you going to back out of the deal? So it looks like in this situation, they must have backed out of the deal because they’re wondering what to do going forward to actually figure out what an actual appropriate offer is. So Tony, the first thing that I would’ve done in this situation is dispute the appraisal. At least attempt to do that, dispute the appraisal, try to renegotiate with the sellers.

Tony:
Yeah, I agree with you 100%. And I think both of us have had experiences where appraisals came in lower than what we had anticipated. And yeah, if you believe that the appraisal was wrong, then yeah, it is very reasonable to go out and say like, Hey, here are some comps, some comparable sales that I found that I feel are better matched than the comparable sales that the arai found. Because sometimes you guys, appraisers are coming from, maybe they don’t know the area as well, right? Maybe they’re coming from somewhere a little bit further out. They just put this appraisal, they were still on work, whatever it may be, but they don’t know that area incredibly well. And sometimes you might know that area better than the appraiser does. So if you can point out, hey, you picked a comp that was three miles away that sold for less, but here’s one that sold more recently, that’s two miles away.
Now you’ve got some ammo to maybe to really contest that appraisal. And one other thing say that the appraiser says, Nope, my appraisal is perfect. Nothing here needs to change another route. You can always go down, and this is obviously a little bit more of a nuclear option, but if you change lenders, and I don’t know if this is law or maybe just best practice, but lenders can’t use the appraiser appraisal from a different lending institution. So if you change lenders immediately, there has to be another appraisal that gets ordered. Now if you’re working with the seller, typically sellers don’t want to push back closing, but if it’s, Hey, either we’re going to close a little bit later or we’re not going to close because the appraisal, they might be a little bit more willing to working with the different lender. So just another way to put some more pressure on the appraising process to make sure it gets done the right way.
Ashley, I think one other thing that you mentioned as well that’s super important is that sometimes a low appraisal can work in your favor. You just have to have the confidence to be able to leverage that as a bargaining chip with the seller because it sounds like maybe you did run your numbers and maybe it did make sense at the purchase price, so it was a good deal. So that doesn’t necessarily mean the value isn’t there, but if you ran the numbers, you liked the deal, everyone agreed, then maybe it is a good deal. But maybe it’s just the fact that the appraisal didn’t come back where you wanted it to. So I would go to the seller and say, look, Mr. And Mrs. Seller, I’m very motivated to buy your home. I love it, the numbers work. However, if I ran into this issue with my appraisal, chances are the next buyer is also going to run into this issue with their appraisal.
So what is in your best interest? Is it giving me the 10, 20, $30,000 discount on the purchase price so we can still close next week? Or do you want to go through the process again of taking the listing down, relisting it, having another buyer who can hopefully get the right appraisal? Maybe they do, maybe they don’t. And you’re in this exact same position, another 60 or 90 days from now. And a lot of times you can get sellers who, if they’re motivated enough, maybe they will come down and meet you at the price that you needed, or at least maybe give you, Hey, let’s meet in the middle. But I think you’ve got to be confident enough to ask that question. If you’ve got a good agent, I think they should be able to negotiate that conversation for you as well.

Ashley:
Yeah, and that kind of leads into the next thing I wanted to bring up is building a team. It mentioned this person is investing out of state, so they can’t actually go and see the property, whether it’s an agent or you need some kind of boots on the ground person that will actually go into the property and be your eyes, but also take a million pictures of the property, take video of the property. We’ve had Nate Robbins on before on the podcast, when he goes to a property, he takes the pictures like you’re walking through the house basically as he takes a step, he’s taking a picture and turns around, each room takes a picture of the doorframe, so you’re entering a different room and then all of that is collected and it’s sent to his partner and then his partner builds out the scope of work in the rehab from just the picture.
So it definitely can be done, but just kind of getting an idea of this is what we should offer on the property based on what you’re seeing. And he always likes to do photos because it’s easier to zoom in on things than it is on video. But they like to have the video too, to kind of get the flow of the house as you go through it. And they do that for the interior and the exterior of the property too. So whether that’s a property manager that you find in the area that you say, Hey, I want to find a property, I want to do this through you guys. Do you have someone on your team that could walk properties for me? Maybe you do it for free wanting your business, or maybe they’ll charge a flat fee, which is definitely worth it to have the boots on the ground.
You could go to the BiggerPockets forums, you could post hate anyone in this area. And it’s not like you really have to, I guess, say trust the person. It’s not like they’re entering into your property, they’re going with your agent or they’re going along and seeing these properties looking and taking pictures and giving you their feedback. And if it’s not super detailed, then hey, you can find someone else to do it too. But I think there’s a lot of people eager to learn who would love to just go and walk houses and work with another investor to see what they’re looking for, things like that. I guess, Tony, the last thing piece I would add to this is what is the cost of a plane ticket to go and see this property? Sometimes paying 200 bucks for a round trip, airfare could be worth it to go and set up a whole bunch of properties, showings in one day or one weekend or something to fly out there and to actually look at them.

Tony:
I couldn’t agree more. Right, and obviously there’s value in long distance investing and building that team, but if it makes sense, I think there’s always value in kind of getting eyes on it yourself as well. But I guess just one last thought for me as well actually, because the question says, what should I be looking at when trying to consider an appropriate offer? You can get a good guess of what you think the property will appraise for as you can go through the process of finding comparable sales yourself, but appraising a property is part art, part sign, so it’s virtually impossible to know down to the dollar what the appraisal will come back at. So as long as you, the investor, the buyer, do your due diligence upfront, you’re using tools like the BiggerPockets calculators, you’re getting quotes from insurance agents to make sure you know what your insurance is, you’re shopping around to get the best debt that you can. As long as you’re controlling all of those things, then I feel like you are following the right process to make an appropriate offer. But don’t feel like you did something wrong simply because the appraisal didn’t come back where you wanted it to. So just a bit of a mindset shift for the rookies that are maybe experiencing a similar issue.

Ashley:
And if you want help analyzing your deal better go to the BiggerPockets calculators because they show you exactly every single expense that you should need. So if you do think it is a deal analysis thing and not actually an appraisal thing, that’s just another resource that you can kind of go, because the numbers don’t lie. As long as you’re verifying what the numbers are, go by that, and that’s what you should be making your offer on, not what you expect the property to appraise for, unless you want to go and you want to add value and then you want to flip it or you want to refinance it. But just if you’re purchasing that property, like Tony said, the appraisal could not be correct and an appraisal, it’s an art form. You could have three different appraisers go to the property and each give you different numbers on it.

Tony:
Three different, yeah.

Ashley:
Okay. Well, we have a special announcement. We have a rookie newsletter that is being sent out every single week. Tony and I writing it ourselves, and we’re trying to give you guys so much value, some reading material and some fun things to learn about real estate investing and what’s going on in the news so you guys can stay up to date as real estate investors in today’s markets. You can head over to biggerpockets.com, hit the get started tab and you’ll see newsletters and it’s got a little new shiny button next to it, hit on newsletters, and you can subscribe right there to the Rookie Newsletter. We can’t wait to hear you guys feedback. Also, if you want to respond to that email, it gets sent right back to Tony and I. So any questions or any feedback you have on the newsletter or things you would love for us to write about, please let us know. Well, thank you so much for joining us on this week’s Rookie reply. If you have questions, head over to the BiggerPockets forums, submit your question there. I’m Ashley. And he’s Tony. And we’ll see you guys on the next Real Estate Rookie podcast.

Watch the Episode Here

Help Us Out!

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

In This Episode We Cover:

  • Costs you must account for when analyzing a rental property
  • The biggest pros and cons of turnkey real estate investing
  • How to properly budget for capital expenditures, maintenance, and repairs
  • Why you need a five-year exit plan when structuring a partnership
  • How to find “boots on the ground” when investing out of state
  • Renegotiating with the seller after receiving a low appraisal
  • And So Much More!

Links from the Show

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

March 2025 Housing Market Update: Are Price Declines Coming?

Is the 4% Rule Dead?

Is the 4% rule dead? Most FIRE-chasers are using this retirement rule completely wrong, and it could cost them their financial freedom. With stock prices falling and many Americans fearing another recession, now is the time to tighten up your retirement portfolio and ensure you can survive if stock prices correct or crash. If you get this wrong, you could delay your FIRE for years or have to go back to work mid-retirement.

The 4% rule is one of the most bulletproof retirement formulas. It’s simple: Build a portfolio from which you can comfortably withdraw 4% annually. Need $40,000 per year to live? Your FIRE number is $1,000,000. Need $100,000 per year? Then you’re looking at $2,500,000. This math has been checked, double-checked, and triple-checked to withstand even the greatest economic depressions. However, most people have their portfolio set up WRONG, and it could put them at significant risk.

So, how do you ENSURE you can retire (early) with the 4% rule? What hedges should you make in your portfolio so your wealth stays afloat even as the economic tide starts to turn? What are Scott and Mindy doing now to prepare for a rocky stock market? Don’t miss this one—it could cost you your FIRE!

Click here to listen on Apple Podcasts.

Listen to the Podcast Here

Read the Transcript Here

Mindy:
Hey, Scott. Is the 4% rule dead?

Scott:
Nope.

Mindy:
All right. That wraps up this episode of the BiggerPockets Money Podcast. He is Scott Trench and I am Eddie Jensen saying, see you later. Alligator or saying haha. Just kidding. We actually have a lot more to talk about this. Hello? Hello, hello and welcome to the BiggerPockets Money podcast. My name is Mindy Jensen and with me as always is my market conscious co-host Scott Trench.

Scott:
Thanks, Mindy. Great to be here. As always, great timing with your intro. BiggerPockets is a goal of creating 1 million millionaires. You are in the right place if you want to get your financial house in order because we truly believe a financial freedom at the 4% rule is attainable for everyone no matter when or where you’re starting, and the math still holds even here in the scary conditions at the start of 2025.

Mindy:
Scott, that intro was a little reminiscent of our show with Michael Kitsis way back in the very beginning of Covid in March of 2020 where we asked him that same question, is the 4% rule dead? And he said, no. Scott, for those who are not familiar with the 4% rule, what is the 4% rule? What are we talking about here?

Scott:
Sure. So the 4% rule is an attempt by a deep body of financial analysis to answer the question, how much money do I need in order to retire? And the idea is that a portfolio that is invested a specific way with a, for example, 60 40 stock bond allocation, although that range can vary between 70 30 and 50 50 stock bonds, a portfolio invested that way in major index fund investments for example, historically has never run out of money over a ensuing 30 year period. And that includes periods with massive economic pain like a portfolio where someone retired right before the Great Depression in 1929, or right before certain major events like the inflationary period in the sixties, seventies and eighties. In there it backtest every historical period that we have great data for in modern history in a 30 year look back. So while there’s an endless debate about whether there could be a future situation where the 4% rule does not hold up in a technical sense, it has held up in every historical period. Although it is true in some periods, a portfolio that starts out at a million dollars may decline in value in most 30 year periods. Someone who was withdrawing 4% of their portfolio who starts with a million dollars, would actually end up with more wealth at the end of the 30 year period than when they began. So it’s an answer to that question, how much money do I need to retire early?

Mindy:
I love that description, Scott. That was a really great description. Bill Bangin originally did this research in 1994 or 1996. I always get those dates mixed up in my head, but either way, it was a long time ago Michael Kitsis came in and ran the numbers where Bangin left off. So Bangin did it in the mid nineties. Michael Kitsis did it in 2018 and ran them. I’m looking at Michael Kit’s chart on starting principle over the course of 30 years. There are some wild numbers. I think the most it gets up to is 9.5 million and the lowest it gets to is not quite zero at year 30. In fact, if you continue on, this person loses their money and goes to zero at year 31. This is every scenario up until 2018 when he ran this report.

Scott:
Yeah, in the vast majority of cases, that chart shows you end up with more wealth after pulling 4% out of your portfolio every year adjusted for inflation at the end of 30 years than when you began. And in a couple of situations you end up with less wealth, but in no situation do you end up with zero wealth and truly run out of money over a 30 year period. Right? So that’s the 4% rule and the math has not changed. In fact, the guy William Bill Bangin actually came out with an update saying that you could actually withdraw as high as 5% with certain portfolios in new research this year. I believe he has a new book on that topic and we will certainly be inviting him to discuss this new research onto the BiggerPockets Money podcast in the coming months here. So that’s the update on the 4% rule in a sense that does it still work?
Does it still uphold Yes. We have no mathematical evidence that the 4% rule does not hold up. Now let’s talk about a couple of paradoxes here, Mindy, with that caveat that first we’ve interviewed a lot of folks in the fire community. We have met very few, maybe none so far still who have truly retired at a 4% rule allocation. We had a couple of folks reach out who said, I retired at the 4% rule. And then it’s like, well, they also have a rental property and they also have a paid off house and they also have a large cash position and those types of things. There’s always a defense mechanism in play well beyond the 4% rule for many of the folks that we talk to that actually spend Tuesday retired and not working on a mostly stock bond portfolio. So that’s the first paradox is we still have yet to meet a true retired at exactly the 4% rule and have nothing else going on out there.
Most people are well beyond the 4% rule or have some sort of cushion on there. The second paradox here is Bill Bangin, the father of the 4% rule who just came out with that research who we’re going to interview shortly here two years ago, announced that he was going 70% to cash and was 30% in stocks and bonds out there for fear of market conditions. Here I am the biggest proponent of the 4% rule in the math and the way I introduced this today, and I am not holding a 4% rule, 60 40, 70 30 or anything close to 50 50 stock bond portfolio. I’m heavily allocated to other things like real estate for example, and private lending will be a part of my portfolio in the next few months. So these paradoxes all exist in the context of the 4% role, even though the math is very sound and it is an excellent answer to the question of how much do I need to retire early?

Mindy:
Alright, so Scott, one thing that I have noticed, I don’t know if you have noticed, but since about 2012 the market has been fairly up and to the right.

Scott:
Oh my gosh, this has been an incredible bull run for the last 12, 15 years essentially, and people have made an incredible amount of money in the stock market in particular, and they’ve done nothing. They just sit there and dollar cost average into it and they’ve been rewarded to degrees unprecedented in history with those investments.

Mindy:
So I actually looked it up on macro trends.net. They have a 100 year historical chart of the Dow Jones and December, 2008 is when it hit the bottom and started climbing. There have been dips since then, but that is the last time it has been the last big low. So 2008 to 2025. Scott, do that math really quick. How long is that?

Scott:
That is 2 5 17, 17 years,

Mindy:
17 years of up into the right. So if I was in the stock market for the last 17 years, which I was, and I kept seeing it go up into the right with some small dips, I would not be tempted to go into bonds in any significant capacity because bonds have traditionally, or in those same last 17 years, what have bond yields been? They’ve been fairly low, right? I’m getting
12, sometimes 15% returns in the stock market and bonds are giving you like three or 4%. I like 15 a whole lot more than I like four. So my current bond portfolio is I believe $0 and I’m okay with that. I’m okay with the risk because I am with great risk comes great reward, potential reward, and my portfolio has gone up significantly. But the 4% rule is what I based my early retirement number on and I am not in a 60 40 portfolio. And that is what the 4% rule is based on. How many people do you think are in a 60 40 portfolio who are fire? Fire in the next year, plans to fire in the next year or have fired recently?

Scott:
I think less than 10% of the people who listen to BiggerPockets money are in a 60 40 stock bond portfolio and it may be less than 5%. Let’s review the data here. So here’s Mindy smiling face in infant mirror and now here’s, I do a poll all the time on BiggerPockets money. It’s one of my favorite things. Thank you so much to everyone who watches the YouTube channel and responds to these polls. There’s a wealth of really good information here that I just love endlessly collecting and then discussing on this. So let’s look at this one right here. Okay, do you actually invest with the classic 60 40 stock bonds portfolio? 680 people responded 90%, 89% said no. I own essentially no bonds with less than 10% of my portfolio. 4% said yes, excluding real estate or cash. My investments are 60 40 stock bonds.
So what we have here, more infinite mirror is dynamic of at least in the fire community of people who are heavily concentrated in stocks. And that is both a function I believe, of the extraordinary bull run we’ve had for the last 17 years, maybe more on there. Well, I guess 17 years exactly with 2008 being the bottom, we’ve had extraordinary bull run for that period of time and the very low yield that bonds are delivering right now, like VBT lx, Vanguard’s Bond Index Fund for example, has a yield to maturity of 4.3% and an income yield of something in the threes. So that’s just not very attractive to many investors out there, especially folks who are personal finance nerds. And that I think has resulted in heavily concentrated portfolios. And the risk I see for the fire community in many, maybe tens or maybe hundreds of millions of American households is that because of this dynamic of huge returns in the stock market and all incremental dollars going into stocks with very little bond exposure, this is a community that is not ready for a market pullback and does not have portfolios that are allocated in the way that the 4% rule has been historically discussed.
Right? The 4% rule, you are not fire. If you need two and a half million dollars to generate a hundred thousand dollars a year in spending and you are a hundred percent in stocks, you are not fire. You can fall out of fire with that. Now if you have that two and a half million dollar portfolio, 60 40 allocated to stocks and bonds, then you are meeting the 4% rule and you have at least in history, never run out of money in a historical simulation calculator. It could be that this time is different, but I would be willing to personally bet that on a 60 40 stock bond portfolio that there will not be a reduction to zero over a 30 year period going forward. We have to take a quick ad break, but want to know what you can do while we’re away? Subscribe to our brand new BiggerPockets money newsletter. Go to biggerpockets.com/money newsletter to subscribe on your very first rendition of this newsletter, you’ll be greeted with a very friendly hello, hello, hello from the one and only Mindy Jensen.

Mindy:
Yes, you will. Welcome back to the show. So Bill Benin’s original study was based on traditional retirement. He didn’t take into account the concept of retiring early because that wasn’t a thing back when he did this in the early nineties. It was like, well, it’s still weird, but it was even more weird back then. We didn’t have podcasts and internet to talk about it. I think that it’s a lot easier to get yourself to a 60 40 portfolio when you are older and you’re retiring at 65. Once you hit 60, you start to think, oh, maybe I don’t want to risk all this money, but you have really compressed your investment timeline into to fit into your fire goals. So I see both sides. Yes, bill Benin said 60 40 and the Trinity Group reran the numbers and they said, yep, he’s right. And Michael Kitsis reran them and he said he’s right. And West Moss ran them and said, yep, Benin’s, right? So all these very, very smart people are looking at all of this historical data and past performance is not indicative of future gains, but they’re looking at all this historical data. They didn’t just make this up, they said with this stock portfolio and I mean, have you read the original report or the original article that Bill bein published in the Journal of Financial Planning way back when? It’s so fascinating he ran this at, Mindy sends

Scott:
This to all of her friends. So yes, I have read this.

Mindy:
I do, I do. It’s a really long article. If you want to read it, email [email protected] and I will send you a copy. It can be a little bit difficult to find online. It was not an online publication when it first came out, but he ran all these different scenarios. He didn’t just come up with this and say, you know what, this sounds good. Somebody sent me a note to say that he was not a rocket scientist. He worked for NASA or he did something with rockets and he’s very, very, very smart. And then he decided to be a financial planner after he was done with that career. And he really looked at this from all angles and ran the numbers in all sorts of different ways. So I do believe that it is still valid. I am still basing my retirement ideas on it, but I am not following it correctly. So if I run out of money first, I will be very shocked. But if I run out of money, it’s my own fault. I’m not following the rules in the first place. And that seems rather harsh. I’m saying that about me. I hope that nobody runs out of money,

Scott:
But yours is true of everyone I have met in the fire community, right? There is a tiny fraction, less than 5% of people who will tell you that they retired on the 4% rule with nothing else. And then when you actually talk to them, oh, there’s my rental, there’s my large cash position, there’s this other thing that I’m doing here. I do this kind of thing to defray costs on this part. They all have something going on. Nobody does this with the 4% rule. Even though again, you’re asking me, is a 4% rule still sound? Does the math still work? Yes. Is it dead? Nope. Do ordinary people, the people we are trying to serve here on BiggerPockets money actually retire on the 4% rule and nothing else? No. And that’s where we need to address it head on in order to help the folks in this community actually see Tuesday afternoon in their thirties or forties the way that they wanted to do it. And I think that’s the fun challenge about this that makes this job so interesting. If it was just a 4% rule, every path would be the same for it, but it doesn’t work that way in practice. It doesn’t work that way in people’s actual psyche. And we have to address that in order to actually achieve our mission of helping people build enough wealth and then stop and enjoy their lives.

Mindy:
How do you approach market downturns if you’re getting ready to retire, if you’re retiring in your thirties or forties instead of when you’ve got a 40 year horizon to save your money? A market downturn isn’t as affecting as when you’ve got a 10 year window.

Scott:
Well, look, I think there’s a couple of ways to go about it, right? The first one, and I think that the right answer is to say there is a approach that makes sense when you’re starting out for all out aggression, right? When I got started all out aggression, highly leveraged house hack, everything was going into stocks. I’ll do that again today. The issue is if you continue that infinitely, then you’ll end up at 65 with an enormous pile of wealth in most historical situations that is far more than you ever needed and you’ll miss that thirties, forties, fifties fire retirement that you said to yourself was the original goal, right? So that’s the problem. So what one answer to the question is just keep going for many, many more years than you really need to and amass so much money that it’s so far beyond what you actually need to retire, that you don’t have to make decisions based on driving cashflow. And Mindy, I’d argue that you’re kind of maybe in that situation to a little bit of a degree, you guys went so far beyond, you have so much more wealth than what was required for the 4% rule that it allows you to not really have to worry about the technical best practices in optimizing the portfolio component. Is that fair?

Mindy:
As you were saying that, I’m like, oh, that’s me Scott. Yes, and not only that, I still work. I have this job. I am a real estate agent and I want to say I made $200,000 last year as a real estate agent working very little. I had a couple of really whopper of a deal properties, but I generate a lot of income and I don’t spend $200,000 a year except this year when we’re building the house. I generate a lot of income in a way that I’m really not reliant my portfolio right now. I have the confidence that my portfolio will eventually recover because I’m not pulling anything out of it right now.

Scott:
And Mindy, guess what? I’m in the same boat here on that front, right? I find myself having started out attempting to achieve fire so I could play video games on Tuesday and now I run an enormous or fairly large company here, do this podcast and work harder than ever on that front. So that’s one answer to the question and that is frankly the answer that you and I both chose and it’s not a terrible one for many folks on there, but there is a cost to that. You’re not retiring at the optimal point if that’s your specific goal there. So that’s one answer to the question. The second way I think to really maximize that early retirement here is to say, I’m going to be in this all out aggressive accumulation mode and then I’m going to stop and I’m going to flip the switch to something much more conservative in the years building up to true early retirement.
And it’s very hard, I think for folks to do that for seven to 10 years, grind away, increase their income, begin amassing a slow but surely compounding pile of assets and then stop and move it all into a conservative portfolio that has 60 40 stocks, bonds, and then begin enjoying it. That’s the right answer. I think that that’s technically the right way to do this is to go all aggressive and then shift it either gradually as we approach 3, 4, 5 years, seven years out from retirement or do it all at once toward the end. But I think very few people will do that in practice even though that’s the right theory, I think. What’s your reaction to those two answers to the question here?

Mindy:
I don’t think that going all out and then retiring and moving it into the conservative portfolio, the recommended is what I would recommend. It seems like you are running just as much risk as if you didn’t do that at all. I would suggest if you are retiring in the next, I dunno, three to five years or the next five years, I guess start instead of allocating your money to the stock market, keep what you’ve got there and then start allocating bonds. Start buying bonds, start buying bond funds. I know so little about bonds because I’m not in them at all. I’ve never really studied them because for 17 years or 16 years we have had such a growth market that bonds didn’t really make a lot of sense. I mean they still make sense. They always make sense because you’re hedging against other things. I wonder, Scott, do another poll.
How many people are not in a 60 40 stock bond portfolio but are 60 ish stocks and 40% something else? You just recently brought that real estate property that is acting as a bond for you. It’s not going to be generating all of these giant returns that a stock market would, a good stock market, not the current stock market, but it’s also fairly safe. It’s the kind of property that is always going to have tenants in it. It’s a fourplex. So it’s not like your tenants leave and then all of a sudden you’re like, oh shucks. Now what? You’ve got three other tenants to help you pay that mortgage until you get that fourth tenant in place. So the vacancy is not a big hit, but I wonder what other kinds of investments are acting like a bond? Like is gold, gold is an inflation hedge?

Scott:
Yes. I think that the headline is every asset class has exploded over the last six years from January, 2019, which is my favorite lookback period in the current climate to January, 2025 except commercial real estate. And then residential real estate has basically paced in price with the increase in the money supply. So I think that there’s plenty of risk in residential real estate, but that other asset classes are at extreme risk. Obviously I think bitcoin’s going to zero. I’ve made that point very clear and multiple things there. You can go beat me up in the comment section as the 900th to a thousandth comment. Disagreeing with me in my video, the Rational Investors case against Bitcoin here on the BiggerPockets money YouTube channel. Gold, by the way, is another one on there. Gold has been pacing the s and p 500 for the last six years. Really it’s gone up 2.3 ish X over the last couple of years. I think it might have pulled back recently a little bit, but gold is, gold is whatever gold was as this store of value, it has gone up in value way faster than the money supply.

Mindy:
So I am looking at the historic gold prices again on macro trends.net. They’ve got some really great charts here and I want to show you this. This is inflation adjusted. So look at this inflation adjusted in 1980, it was $2,700, now it’s $2,800 inflation

Scott:
Adjusted. So the return for gold from 2000 has been what? Five x? It’s unbelievable, right? Inflation is not. This is real. This is inflation adjusted,

Mindy:
This is inflation adjusted, this is, but it’s

Scott:
Incredible how expensive gold is in terms of its historical value. I mean investors are fearing the market right now and we’ll talk about that a little bit in a few minutes here as well. Or maybe that’s a good transition point here to talk about what is going on in the stock market right now.

Mindy:
Alright, my dear listeners, we want to hit a hundred thousand subscribers on YouTube and we need your help. While we take a quick ad break, please hop on over to youtube.com/biggerpockets money and make sure you are subscribed to this channel. Stay tuned after the break for more.

Scott:
Thanks for sticking with us.

Mindy:
Okay, Scott, what’s going on in the stock market right now? A whole lot of down, we are recording this on March 11th. Yesterday there was a 900 point drop based on a commentary from the administration. Today there is an additional drop. I haven’t even seen how much yet because I’ve been working, but it is based on double tariffs on Canadian steel.

Scott:
Look, I think the problem that I saw that I see and saw is just historically high price to earnings ratios on a reel or inflation adjusted basis. So we discussed that at length in a previous episode here. That was the risk factor in here. And I think what is causing this problem is very simple. There’s a large body of activity coming from the new Trump administration and that activity is causing uncertainty. And some could use the word chaos that is confusing markets and individuals and I think several hundred million Americans are asking themselves the question, am I comfortable having most or all of my financial portfolio and investment portfolio in stock market funds that are disproportionately allocated to the United States in the context of the current environment? And increasingly more and more of those people are saying, no, I’m not comfortable with that. And Mindy, that scares the heck out of me. We can talk about the 4% rule all day long on this and how it works. I’m just not comfortable allocating huge percentages of my net worth to stock market index funds given that risk. I think that’s a real risk and that we could have a lot more pain to come. It can go every way. Who knows what the market’s going to do with all this stuff. I just can’t handle the heat. And so I got out of the kitchen

Mindy:
And where did you go?

Scott:
I put it into real estate. I rebalanced my 401k and HSA accounts to 60 40 stock bond portfolios that my bond fund of choice is V-B-T-L-X. I also have a large pile of cash which I’ll put into. I’ll go back to private lending and that one in the hard money space and I’ll likely buy another rental property later on in this year and I’ll likely make several syndication investments in the most distressed markets around the country, probably mostly here in Denver in multifamily and or a sprinkling of office.

Mindy:
If you don’t want to rely on the 4% rule anymore or you don’t want to rely on the 60 44% rule, what options do you have, Scott?

Scott:
Well look, let’s go back to the, let’s pretend we’re retiring with a million or two and a half dollars portfolio in the 4% rule, and let’s begin to alleviate our fears, right? Even if there’s a crash as bad as the Great Depression or an inflationary environment as bad as the seventies and eighties, this rule is held up second and it’s all adjusted for inflation on the 4%. Rule math second, that 4% rule assumes that you will never decrease your spending in the event of a market catastrophe. It assumes, assumes that you’ll never earn another dollar of any type with any work whatsoever in the event of a downturn. You could get a part-time job, for example, to defray some of those expenses or offset components of it. It assumes you’ll never get social security or other forms of benefits in there. It assumes that you’ll never start a business.
It assumes that you’ll never swap certain spending for other things in an inflationary adjusted inflation environment. When eggs get expensive to eat oats for breakfast instead for a while, it makes none of those assumptions. So all of those are ways to defray the risks. The 4% rule before we even get into alternatives, once we get into alternatives, there are plenty of options. Obviously one of the ones I’m most comfortable with is real estate. I’ve been doing BiggerPockets for the last 11 years on this. This is a clear area that I’m comfortable with and feel like I have some skill in. Private lending is another one that you can get into on this. Building a bigger cash position is another one. Starting some kind of side business, even one that’s seasonal. For example, we had that Christmas lights guy, a kid come on the show kid, he was 25, but we had this Christmas lights man that was doing that and making almost six figures in a couple of months at the end of the year.
There’s so many different ways to begin doing that, but I think that having one or two of those alternatives layered into your portfolio, keep your formula. If you’re like the 4% ruling, you like the passiveness of stocks and bonds, keep your formula and go hit it and then layer on. You have likely many years between now and TrueFire every year or two, maybe every six months, if you’re like me, every 90 days, layer in some side bets that can begin to compound because you just need one or two, I believe for most people to really defray the risks, the discomfort and the pit of your stomach with the 4% rule as your only backstop in your portfolio. Just have build a couple of those over time and that should put you more than over the edge when a decision comes to actually pull the trigger and retire early,

Mindy:
The end result, there’s still, I want to say it’s 12 times that you would’ve ended up with less than a million dollars at the end, and that’s all past information. But I think that a $1 million portfolio is going to be enough for people who have a paid off house or a very low mortgage. My mortgage is $1,300 a month, I’m not going to pay it off very fast at all. I can just build that into my numbers to make that an expense. I think that I’m not in a low cost of living area, but my cost of living is low because I bought a house in 2019 for very little money compared to what I could get if I sold it. And now these prices aren’t available. It’s been five years we’ve had that market run up. If you are a renter, your rents are probably going to go up over the next 30 years.

Scott:
Yeah, that’s a key bet too. That informs parts of my portfolio. I mean, there’s a lot of math that suggests that renting is better than buying right now with historical averages. But I believe that while 2025 will not see significant rent growth, I believe we’ll see rents rise dramatically in 2026 and 2027 across this country because a large amount of the supply that’s going on, like multifamily construction will start to abate. And if interest rates stay high, that should continue to push up demand for rentals because the alternative to renting, buying a home is up there. So I think that buying is a great way to defray risk of a 4% rural portfolio because you lock in your housing expense adjusted for inflation, whether you use a mortgage or not on there. So there is something to be said for buying a home. Especially one of my favorite tactics that’s coming up is I’m talking to people from high cost living areas and they’ve got a million dollars in equity in their homes in certain parts of California or the east coast.
And those markets are also great because if you have a house like that and you’re dead set on staying there, but you want to travel, many of those markets offer things like you can rent out your house 25% of the time on short-term rentals only if you’re an owner occupant. That’s an awesome way to defray early retirement expenses, by the way. So I think that there’s, there’s options that come with home homeownership that are not available to renters where you just know your portfolio has to cover the renter’s expense in some of those. So it’s not black and white in that. Guess the math leans if you don’t have any of these side bets in place towards renting over buying right now. But it is nice to just have it locked in. No, I can stay here for 20 years and not have to worry about material inflation adjusted costs to my living outside of my taxes and insurance and maintenance, I guess.

Mindy:
Ooh, and taxes and insurance. That’s a great conversation that we’ll have another time. But yeah, I’m hearing that insurance, homeowners insurance is going up.

Scott:
I got a 90% quote for a 90% increase in my home insurance, then I shopped it around and my premium will decrease by 50%. So shop around guys, because some of these carriers are different

Mindy:
Things. Absolutely. Shop it around and if your property taxes go up exponentially, even if your property taxes go up just a little bit, protest them. Figure out how your city will have a detailed way for you to protest your tax increase and protest protested every single time. I have never protested and not gotten a

Scott:
Reduction. Yeah, I plan to shop all of my rental property insurance policies and my assessed values, my rental properties this year. I got a feeling that I’ve been neglecting that and I got a good 10,000 to $15,000 in cost savings annually in that exercise for me. So

Mindy:
They reassess on the odd year. So they’re going to reassess this year and you will probably see an increase next year.

Scott:
Yeah, well guess. Well, look, I think there’s a case that my properties are down in value. We got a buyer’s market in the commercial side on some of these, so we’ll see. Yeah.

Mindy:
Yeah, you have to do some research in order to do the protest, but I have always had it be well worth it for me to protest my tax increases.

Scott:
Yeah. Going back to the 4% rule piece there though, this is a key concept because how little you spend, the less you spend, the easier all of this gets. So if you can control adjusted for inflation, the costs to commute, the costs to live in your house, your food costs, those types of things, you can go from anywhere from reasonable, like paying off a mortgage and having your housing costs fixed outside of your taxes, insurance and maintenance to extreme installing solar panels, for example, to mitigate your electricity bill for the foreseeable future to planting a garden to grow much of your own. You can get really extreme with this stuff, but that framework as you apply it puts less and less pressure on your overall portfolio and makes that margin of safety in the 4% rule, safer and safer and safer and safer. And that’s a luxury I think that a lot of folks who do actually pull the trigger will have is not only is there these opportunities to earn more money, not only will you probably not do with nothing for 30 years that generates an income, but you’ll also be able to tackle the projects that control expenses in your portfolio, do your own taxes, those types of things to defray costs, which can make your portfolio stretch longer.
And again, that’s not accounted for in the 4% rule if you put in conservative expense estimates upfront. So those are all things you can do. And then again, there’s always the world of alternatives out there.

Mindy:
That sounds like a show for another day. Scott, I want to hear from our listeners, what do you think of the 4% rule? Are you still excited about it? Are you in at a hundred percent stocks? Have you adjusted your fire plans in response to the recent market conditions? Please leave a comment below, leave a comment on your, if you’re watching this on YouTube, leave a comment below. We will also post this in our Facebook group, so we would love to hear from you, what are your fire plans and what are your impressions of the 4% rule today? You can also email [email protected] [email protected] to give us your opinion as well. Alright, Scott. I think this is a very lively discussion. I can’t wait till the comments are coming in.

Scott:
Yeah, this was fun. Mindy, thanks so much for joining me today and I’m glad we didn’t have a 15 second episode. After all,

Mindy:
Anybody who has ever met me knows that I cannot talk for only 15 seconds. Alright, that wraps up this episode of the BiggerPockets Money podcast. He is Scott Trench. I am Mindy Jensen now saying, see you later, alligator. And yes, Jason, that’s for you.

Watch the Episode Here

Help Us Out!

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

In This Episode We Cover

  • The 4% rule explained and whether it still works in 2025 and during market downturns
  • Why your FIRE portfolio is WRONG, and it could be at massive risk right now
  • How to prepare for an economic downturn to ensure you stay FIREd or on the path to FIRE
  • What Scott is selling and buying right now to protect his wealth (will his strategy work?)
  • Alternatives to the 4% rule that will protect your retirement portfolio even during the greatest of depressions
  • And So Much More!

Links from the Show

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Check out our sponsor page!

March 2025 Housing Market Update: Are Price Declines Coming?

100% Bonus Depreciation Could Return This Year: 2025 Tax Update

Real estate is one of the most tax-advantaged investments in the country. With bonus depreciation, opportunity zone investing, 1031 exchanges, and more, investing in real estate is not only the best way to build wealth—it’s the key to tax-free (or deferred) wealth. So, with a Republican-controlled House and Senate, will new tax proposals favoring real estate investments pass?

We’ve got some news that could make 2025 a “game-changer” year for real estate investors. CPA Brandon Hall joins us to break it down.

With numerous proposals floated to restore 100% bonus depreciation, extend opportunity zone investments, and eliminate taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security, 2025’s tax laws could look very different if these changes pass.

Plus, there’s one huge real estate tax write-off you’re (probably) not taking advantage of. Brandon shares how investors can write off even more during rehabs and renovations, using a specific tax deduction most investors have never heard of.

Find investor-friendly tax and financial experts with BiggerPockets Tax & Financial Services Finder!

Click here to listen on Apple Podcasts.

Listen to the Podcast Here

Read the Transcript Here

Dave:
Hey everyone, I’m Dave Meyer. Welcome back to On the Market. The Year 2025 is shaping up to be a potential tax game changer for real estate investors. With the potential return of a hundred percent bonus depreciation and a range of new opportunities. Today, we’re breaking down some potential changes to popular tax strategies and the new opportunities that could pass Congress in the coming months. Joining me on today’s episode is Brandon Hall of Hall CPA. He’s a real estate tax expert who’s here to guide us through it all. Stick around because these moves could redefine your investing game this year. Let’s jump in. Brandon, welcome back to On the Market. Thanks for being here.

Brandon:
Thanks, Dave. Happy to be here.

Dave:
As our audience must remember, Brandon joins us probably about once a year to talk about taxes, and this is a perfect time of year to just be talking about some of the updates to the tax code that are relevant to real estate investors that we know about. And then the second half of the show, we’ll pull out our crystal balls and talk about some of the things that are being discussed in terms of new policy. And we’d just love your opinions on those, Brandon, because we don’t know exactly how they’ll shape up. But tell us, are there any new changes to the tax codes that have actually been enacted that you think real estate investors should really know about right now?

Brandon:
I would say that the big one is just that bonus depreciation continues to phase out. So this year we are 40% bonus depreciation. Next year, 2026 will be 20%, and then 2027 will be 0%. If nothing changes. Now there’s a high expectation that something will change, but as of right now, that’s what we’re looking at. So when the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was originally implemented back in 2017, 100% bonus depreciation came with it. So if you were buying a rental property and doing a cost segregation study, historically you would get 50% bonus depreciation on various components. But with the 2017 TCJA, you could buy a property, get a cost segregation study performed, and for any component with a useful life of less than 20 years, which typically on cost sick studies is about 25 to 30% of the value of the property. Those components can be 100% written off via bonus depreciation. But that 100% depreciation’s been phasing out. So this year it’s 40%. So the value of the cost eg study is essentially being eroded. But even if bonus depreciation, 0% ever reaches that 0%, it will still be valuable to do a cost EG study. I’ve gotten that question a few times. It’s like, well, it’s always valuable to front load your deductions to create tax deductions for you, tax losses for you so that you can create tax savings, but it’s not as valuable as it would have been if you had a hundred percent bonus depreciation.

Dave:
Okay. And so I’m curious, just in your business then, there’s been a lot of talk of bonuses, depreciation, getting extended in a new potential tax law that comes out with the new Trump administration. Are you seeing people hold off on doing cost eggs or can you use a cost segregation study that is done now for your 2025 taxes regardless of when that law gets passed?

Brandon:
So we’re not seeing people really hold off. We are seeing people ask questions, but most of our clients that are doing cost segregation studies right now are doing them for their 2024 acquisitions. So you just have to do a cost study for the property before you file that first tax return, which you could do for a 2024 property all the way up until October 15th, 2025.

Dave:
Wow.

Brandon:
Yeah, so you don’t have to do the SIG study in the same year. Now all the SIG firms, and if you’re a Ssec person listening to this, don’t worry, I love cost sick people, but all the SIG people, a lot of the SIG people will really push, get a cost act done immediately, typically in November and December because they have sales targets that they’re trying to achieve. But you don’t just have to do it before you file your first tax return with that property on it. So if you’re purchasing a property in 2025, my recommendation would just be to either go ahead and do the cost ex study if you’re happy with the 40% bonus depreciation. But if you’re not happy with 40%, if it doesn’t give you the return that you’re looking for or the tax savings that you’re looking for, then yeah, hold off and kind of see what comes out a little bit later on this year.

Dave:
One thing I’m always sort of curious about with cost segregation studies is does it make sense for people who don’t have real estate professional status to do this? And maybe you can also explain what real estate professional status is because you’re probably doing a lot better than I can.

Brandon:
So does it make sense for people that don’t have real estate professional status? Yes, but every answer it depends. And it really depends on the passive losses that would be created from this CASICK study. When you front load the depreciation, you’re creating a much larger tax write off for yourself, but that tax deduction is going to be considered passive. And so you have to look at do you have passive income to offset the passive losses with, because if you don’t have passive income and you just have all these passive losses that are accruing and you’re not a real estate professional, then the passive losses will just be suspended and carried forward. So you’re not going to be able to utilize them today. And even that’s not the worst case scenario because in my situation, I’ve done a couple cost checks on properties and I’m not a real estate professional. My wife’s not a real estate professional, so we just have suspended passive losses that are accumulating on our tax returns. But now I’m in a pretty nice position where I could sell a couple of my rentals just outright and not have to jump through 10 31 exchange hoops and utilize the passive losses that are sitting on our books.
So it creates some flexibility. It’s not the worst thing. It’s not optimal, but it’s not the worst thing, if that makes sense. So yeah, if you’re not a real estate pro, it’s just a passive loss equation. That’s the game. So if you can create passive income, then you’re set. We have some clients that invest in surgical centers, they’ll invest in venture funds that are buying businesses like a venture fund might give my business some money for a stake in my business and then I’m passing profit back to that venture fund. Well, that’s passive income to anybody that owns a stake in that venture fund. So we have clients that figure out how to create passive income that they then use the rental losses to offset with. And that’s where cost stakes can make a lot of sense, even if you’re not a real estate pro

Dave:
Just for everyone. So that the benefit of being a real estate professional is that you get to use those passive losses to offset active income instead of passive income. So for example, if my wife were a real estate professional, I could then take the passive losses from that cost segregation study and apply it to my W to income and reduce my total taxable income, not just my passive income. So that is a really big benefit. And why, depending on your personal situation, you see sometimes a spouse becoming a real estate professional to enjoy some of those additional tax benefits.

Brandon:
It’s a huge benefit. If you have a spouse that’s a real estate pro and you’re a high income earner, you file a joint tax return, you’ve got a real estate professional status tax return, and as long as you’re materially participating in your rentals, those rental losses are passive. So now you’re doing a cost segregation study to front load the depreciation. You’re creating large tax losses that you can immediately use to write off against your income, and it creates immediate tax savings for you that you go and reinvest and continue to build your wealth in your portfolio. But if you’re not a real estate pro, those losses remain passive. They become suspended and they sit with your tax return indefinitely so forever, and you can use them at some point, but it’s just not as beneficial as being able to capture the tax benefit today, redeploy the tax savings into more real estate or other assets and continue to grow your wealth.
And I should also say that this is a timing play, right? So we’re talking about front loading depreciation. Eventually we have to pay that back. Whenever we sell the property, we have something called depreciation recapture. So 10, 20, however many years later, you end up selling your assets. You do have to pay depreciation recapture, which is basically all the depreciation you’ve ever claimed up until that point. They can get pretty expensive to sell, which is why people do 10 31 exchanges. And it’s also why they passed down these real estate assets to their heirs because their heirs get a stepped up basis in the property equal to fair market value at the date of death and all that depreciation recapture goes away. So a lot of our clients just continue to roll it into the next property with that eventual intention. And if they ever need cash today, instead of selling the property, they just get a loan on the property, cash it out because loans are not taxable.

Dave:
Wow, that’s a good strategy. I like that.

Brandon:
Yeah.

Dave:
Alright, well, so it sounds like depreciation and bonus depreciation, good thing to know, it’s down to 40% this year, but everyone should probably be keeping an eye out on what happens with tax policy over the next couple of months. Before we get into looking towards the future, Brandon, what are some of the other things that strategies that real estate investors should be thinking about going into tax season?

Brandon:
The number one strategy that it’s kind of more of like a compliance thing, to be totally honest with you. It’s not really like a strategy that you can actively deploy, if that makes sense. It really just depends on the competency of the professionals that you’re using or your yourself. If you DIY, your tax returns, it’s something called partial asset dispositions. So these, I believe they came about from the 2013 tangible property regulations, but basically the concept is if you replace a component of the property that you own, then you should be able to deduct the cost of the component that you replaced. So for example, if I bought a property, it obviously comes with a roof, that roof has value. Whether or not I do a cost segregation study, it is true that the roof would have some sort of value that could be allocated to it. So if I go and replace the roof with a new roof, then I should be able to identify the cost of the old roof that I ripped out of the property, and I should be deducting that cost. I would say that’s probably the number one thing that is missed on tax returns.

Dave:
Oh, ING okay.

Brandon:
Is just not deploying that. Right. So with our clients, we’re always looking at those improvement schedules and we’re scrubbing the balance sheet and trying to figure out what are the costs of the components that we rip out. And frankly, we don’t do a good enough job telling clients that we’re doing that.

Dave:
And should that reduce and a lower tax burden?

Brandon:
If you’re deducting that, yeah, you’re able to deduct it immediately. Yeah, it’s going to go right off against any of the income that you’re earning.

Dave:
Okay.

Brandon:
Yeah, it’s a great way And you don’t have the depreciation recapture on that later because you ripped it out of your balance sheet.

Dave:
Oh, right.

Brandon:
So it’s like a double whammy.

Dave:
So is that something you sort of have to do yourself though? Because I can imagine you’re not getting some tax form from your contractor saying, I ripped out X dollars amount of components. So do you just have to go and do that manually?

Brandon:
I mean, it depends, right? If you’re in a roof example or like an HVAC or a water heater type of example, you’re typically getting one invoice
For the replacement roof, the materials, the labor, right? Most people give that invoice to their accountants, and what the accountants need to do is go and say, okay, I have this new roof. Let’s identify the old roof and assign a cost to it and then deduct it from the balance sheet. But most of the time that’s not happening. And the way that you can tell if that’s happening or not, A really simple example is let’s say that you bought a hundred thousand dollars property, $80,000 is allocated to improvements, 20,000 is allocated to land. You did not do a cost egg study. So if you look at your tax returns, there are supporting schedules called the federal Asset Schedule, I think is what it’s called. It’s typically in landscape view. If you’re looking at your PDF form. So if you just scroll all the way down and look for the landscape views, there’s going to be this kind of schedule that says the name of the property, and then it’s going to say, building 27 and a half, it’s going to show you the annual depreciation, and then it’s going to show you the cost assigned to that building. So in this example, it would be $80,000. Now when I replace the roof, typically what happens is you just see another entry on that schedule that says roof 27 and a half years, $10,000. What you also want to see is you want to see the building being decreased from 80,000 to call it 75,000. If $5,000 of cost was assigned to the old roof.
Typically you don’t see that. And so what’s happening in those situations is you now have 10 K of new roof. You also have this $80,000 of building value where the old roof is embedded in. And so now you’re depreciating in effect two roofs, even though you only have one. Got it. Okay. So it’s really inefficient for real estate

Dave:
Investors. That makes a lot of sense. How if I were to go to my CPA and say, am I doing this? How would you phrase that exact question to make sure I’m asking it right,

Brandon:
Man, I’ve thought about this a lot because we see this mistake all the time, and I’ve talked about this a lot. I don’t know. I think the best thing to do is just say, Hey, I have this improvement. Can you make sure that we do partial asset dispositions,

Dave:
Partial asset dispositions?

Brandon:
Okay. I think that’s the best thing to do, and put it in writing and an email partial asset dispositions. Can we make sure we do that? Just get ’em to give you a reply one way or the other.

Dave:
I’m writing that one down. Everyone write that one down right now. Partial asset dispositions. That’s going to be helpful this year

Brandon:
And there’s some nuances to it, so you might not actually be able to do it all the time, but that is the number one mistake that we see, not people not doing.

Dave:
We’ve covered a lot already and there is plenty more to discuss. But before we head to break, I wanted to mention BiggerPockets brand new Tax and Financial Services Finder. If you’re eager to get started in real estate investing, a smart first step is to partner with an investor friendly financial planner who could help you get your house in order and ensure you’re set up for financial success from the get-go. Go to biggerpockets.com/tax pros to get matched with a tax professional and financial planner in your area. We’ll be right back. Welcome back to On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer here with Brandon Hall, and we’ve got more insights to share on 2020 five’s tax strategies. We just heard about what Brandon thinks you should be paying attention to for your taxes filing for 2024. But in the news, there has been a lot of talk and discussion of potential tax changes, extensions of tax cuts from 2017. So Brandon, maybe you could just start by telling us what are the big ticket things you think are being discussed and which ones are the most interesting and relevant to real estate investors?

Brandon:
So the biggest ticket items are just extending the 2017 tax Cut and Jobs act as is. So the house passed their budget framework. Now, a lot of people got this confused with like, oh, these are the actual tax proposals. We actually haven’t seen any actual tax proposals yet. So I just want to make that really clear. For anybody that’s listening and potentially seeing bad advice online, we don’t know what’s included yet. What we do know is that the house passed a budget framework, which basically says we want to approve this certain amount of spending to use in these various areas, and the amount that they approved would cover the entire 2017 tax cuts and Jobs Act being extended. So what was in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act? Well, you had a hundred percent bonus depreciation. For anybody that’s developing software or tools or anything like that, you had a hundred percent expensing of RD costs.
You have the salt cap limits. That was the $10,000 itemized deduction issue that really hosed a lot of people living in high income tax states or high property tax states. You can no longer deduct all the property taxes or the state income taxes. They were capped at 10 K. That would potentially be included in this bill if it were to eventually pass, is maintaining that $10,000 cap. You also have the 20% QBI deduction that pass through deduction. And then there’s a couple things like the standard deduction is I think is a $12,000 base, I think is what it is, adjusted for inflation, that would be halved. If that’s not extended, then you’d have personal exemptions come back into play. So there’s a lot of things from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that would be interesting to go back and look through if you’re curious about what could potentially be extended. But essentially it’s almost like a no change, if that makes sense.

Dave:
Right? Yeah. It’s like we’re just not going back to 2016 essentially.

Brandon:
Yeah, exactly. Exactly. If that doesn’t happen, then starting January 1st, 2026, a lot of this stuff is being reverted. One of the big ones is the estate tax. That exemption is I believe roughly 13 million per person right now. And that would be reverted back to what it was pre 2017, which is half of that. So if you’re dying in 2026 or beyond, it’s not going to be good for you or

Dave:
For your heirs. For your heirs.

Brandon:
Yeah. Why would you care?

Dave:
Okay. But it seems like with a Republican controlled Congress, it feels to me like it’s almost certainly going to get extended.

Brandon:
They have to do this through the budget reconciliation process. So the challenge is that the budget has to balance in a 10 year window, typically speaking, in order to do this with the budget reconciliation process. Now, why would we do it through the budget reconciliation process? Because you just need a simple majority to pass policy through the budget reconciliation process. So the house and the Senate is Republican controlled. Thus we want to do it that way. We don’t want to have to have a super majority or anything like that in order to pass policy because then the Democrats will stall, right? Or they’ll push it away, they won’t sign on. So that’s the key. The problem though is balancing that budget over a 10 year horizon, extending the TCJA, I believe the tax foundation estimates that it’s going to cost even after GDP add-backs roughly 3.8 trillion over the 10 year horizon. So they’re going to be fighting that. How do you balance that? And that’s where we get some of the tariff talk. I believe that’s coming into play

Dave:
That tariffs would generate enough revenue to offset that.

Brandon:
Yeah, in theory. And then it’s like are you allowed to include that in the markups and the balancing? So it’s just a lot of back and forth on it. Yeah.

Dave:
Okay. So there’s a lot of gamesmanship and procedural congressional questions that are still have to be answered.

Brandon:
Yes. But I think that we’ll have a lot of clarity here. Probably within the next two to three weeks, at least the spirit of the bill, we will understand probably the next two to three weeks.

Dave:
And what about any potential further changes or policies that will affect the tax code? I’ve heard about tips not being taxable. I’ve heard tax exemptions or deductions for veterans. Those are interesting in their own right. But are there any potential, anything that’s being discussed that might pertain to real estate investors particularly?

Brandon:
So, so far, the ones that seem to be gaining steam are no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on social security payments. So those are the three big ones. And then obviously this universal tariff baseline of driving some amount of revenue, having our foreign countries pay for our needs type of deal. I think those are the big ones that we’re seeing. But again, the problem is going back to balancing the budget over a 10 year window because you have to do that in order to use the budget reconciliation process as it stands today. So how do you extend the TCJA as it was and also add on these additional campaign promises that were made? I think it’s going to be really challenging and it’s going to be a really interesting back and forth that we’re going to witness here over the coming months.

Dave:
Don’t go anywhere. There’s still a lot to unpack. We’ll be back after a quick break. Welcome back to on the market. Let’s jump back in. Obviously all of these changes will impact you on a personal level probably, or on your ordinary income tax or if you’re a tipped worker or receiving social security or overtime obviously. But it sounds like for real estate investors, bonus depreciation is the big one.

Brandon:
I would say bonus depreciation is the big, I do think that 20% qualified business income deductions good.
But I would also say something that has really flown under the radar is opportunity funds, qualified opportunity funds. I don’t know what it would look like to extend that or bring it back or anything like that. And you could still invest in qualified opportunity funds today, so they haven’t gone away. But back when the 2017 TCJA was launched, you could essentially move money, move gains out of equities, for example, put them into real estate and delay, defer the taxation on those gains for, I believe it was like seven years. And by the time that that seven years came around, you only had to pay tax on 85% of the
Gains.
So you got this sweet tax break by moving money out of equities and into real estate that was in qualified opportunities zones, basically like lower income areas, areas that they wanted to gentrify and build up. So it’d be interesting to see if any of that comes back into play with new timing requirements. You can’t get that 15% discount anymore, but a qualified opportunity funds are phenomenal. Even still today, if you have a 10 year time horizon, they can be really, really great for you if you’re strategic about setting up a qualified opportunity fund or investing in a qualified opportunity fund because there are still great tax savings if you hold for at least 10 years. But that’ll be an interesting one to see if it comes back. I think you’ll have a lot more education and focus on that because people are now educated on how it actually works. And so if it does come back, I think it would just be interesting to watch unfold.

Dave:
Yeah, probably get started up quicker. There’ll probably be more players because last time around it felt like people didn’t really get it for a few years and the clock was already ticking unless you got into it in the first couple of years after it was passed, you sort of missed out on the best benefit and then if you waited a little longer, you missed out on the second best benefit. And that third benefit I think is still around, but it’s just not as appealing. I think that would be super interesting if that happens again. So that’s definitely something we’ll keep an eye out as well.

Brandon:
Yeah, and the problem too is it was so technical that a lot of accountants didn’t even know where to start with advising their clients on it. So they just didn’t. So they just wasn’t like something that you would include in a normal, Hey, you should do this thing to mitigate your taxes type of planning. And I think if it came back, you would see a lot more of that.

Dave:
Alright, well thank you so much Brandon for your insights on the tax code. Is there anything else you think our audience should know before we get out of here?

Brandon:
Don’t hold me to this, but I’ve got my money on. If 100% bonus depreciation does come back, it’ll be as of January 1st, 2025.

Dave:
Agreed.

Brandon:
So we’ll see. But I was talking with our national head of tax the other day about this too, because we were kind of trying to guesstimate do we think it’s going to be retroactive to January this year? But his point was like, well back in 2017 when the TCJA was implemented, it was after, I believe September 27th and beyond. If you bought a property September 27th and beyond that, if you closed on September 26th, no, a hundred percent bonus depreciation for you. Wow. But I’ve got my money on January 1st, so we’ll

Dave:
See. Okay. I was kind of assuming it would go retroactive. I don’t know why. It just seemed like the logical thing to do to just make it available for the whole tax year. But I guess we’ll have to wait and see. But not being nearly as informed as you are, my money’s with you. Alright, well Brandon, thank you so much for joining us. We appreciate it.

Brandon:
Thanks Dave. I appreciate it.

Dave:
Alright, that is all for today’s episode of On the Market. Whether you are optimizing your rental losses, leveraging cost s, or navigating new federal guidelines, solid tax planning can make a world of difference for real estate investors. So I want to thank Brandon Hall for sharing this valuable insight and information with us. If you want to connect with him, we will put a link to his website in the show notes. And if this conversation helped you gain clarity for your 2024 tax strategy, be sure to spread the word on this episode. I’m Dave Meyer, thanks for tuning in and we’ll see you next time.

Help Us Out!

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

In This Episode We Cover

  • 100% bonus depreciation—is it coming back, and when could it go into effect?
  • The most commonly missed real estate tax write-off you MUST know about
  • Tax-free income sources and which types of income could dodge Uncle Sam’s grip
  • Opportunity zone updates and whether this tax-deferred investment will be renewed
  • Still doing your taxes? Tell your CPA this BEFORE you file 
  • And So Much More!

Links from the Show

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

March 2025 Housing Market Update: Are Price Declines Coming?

The Threat Facing Real Estate Investors Today and Why Tenants Should Be Treated as Clients

When I first started investing in real estate around 2006 (yeah, I know, not a great time to start), the biggest dangers to the industry were things like interest rate hikes, too much competition for properties, and of course, a looming, real estate-driven financial crisis. 

After the dust settled, the biggest problem by far was obtaining financing, as every bank was shell-shocked. As the market clawed back but new construction lagged behind, finding quality properties to purchase in an overcrowded market became the biggest challenge. Then, the COVID-19 pandemic hit and exacerbated that problem dramatically (although, helpfully, it sent real estate prices through the roof).

Now, however, our industry is dealing with a new problem we haven’t faced in a long time: politics.

The Political Threats to the Housing Industry

During her campaign, Kamala Harris proposed a law that would strip investors with over 50 single-family homes of the mortgage interest deduction or the ability to offset income taxes through depreciation. While such a law won’t pass under a Trump administration, it most certainly might at a later date when the pendulum swings back to the Democratic side. 

States and municipalities throughout the country have passed numerous anti-landlord laws, amongst which are some that bring back the failed policy of rent control. They have also passed laws prohibiting landlords from discriminating on source of income (24 states and about 150 localities have done so, as of this writing), and Minneapolis went so far as to all but ban the use of credit checks in tenant screening. 

Many other such laws have been passed or proposed. And let us not forget about the eviction moratorium during the pandemic. 

Not all of this is bad, of course. We should recognize that landlords have greater leverage in negotiations with tenants. After all, we write the lease. There should also be some governmental protections for tenants against bad landlords. But the trajectory right now is going way too far in the tenants’ direction, and the rhetoric coming from many activists is even worse.

While you can brush aside loud minorities like the various Maoists yelling to “hang landlords,” there are other, more serious challenges coming our way. One group called People’s Action wants to  “decommodify” housing. It proposes “taxing the appreciation of privately owned homes.” How much of the appreciation would be taxed? All of it, of course. 

Many more organizations are making advocating for tenants their primary mission. The Urban League has been around for a long time, but many others have started, such as Partners for Dignity (formerly NESRI), which wants to “advance models that ensure community control over the use of land and other natural resources and are not reliant on private profits,” or The Eviction Lab at Princeton University that investigates the (overblown) “eviction crisis” in the United States. 

In 2016, Peter Marcuse and David Madden published the popular book In Defense of Housing, where they argue, “Everyone needs and deserves housing. But today, our homes are being transformed into commodities.” And so on and so forth.

It’s gotten to the point where the pro-market Forbes writer Roger Valdez (who has done a lot of good work debunking anti-landlord claims) has predicted, “The United States may see the nationalization of private rental housing by the end of this decade.”

I think this is certainly hyperbole, but it underlines a distressing and deteriorating situation. There are many causes for this, including some rabble-rousers and the mistaken notion that landlords just pocket the rent and make enormous profits.  (This false notion can be partly blamed on the godawful real estate gurus BiggerPockets is at least a partial answer to.) 

Unfortunately, as housing prices have skyrocketed predominantly due to insufficient building and, to a lesser extent, large-scale immigration in the last decade, many younger people cannot afford to buy. Homeownership rates have plummeted amongst the millennials and Generation Xers because housing affordability is about the worst it’s been in American history

This chart quite tellingly illustrates what has happened:

image1 1

The Counterproductive Antagonism Between Landlords and Tenants

While this understandably can cause resentment against landlords, I believe another major component is the completely unnecessary antagonism that has developed in recent years between landlords and tenants on both sides.

One major flaw in theories of class conflict is that classes in a market economy are not fixed. Of course, there’s corruption and nepotism and other issues like that, which can harden the boundaries between haves and have-nots, but such problems are anathema to the functioning of a market economy and can be addressed without resorting to outright socialism.

One of the best illustrations of this point is that virtually every landlord I know was once a tenant. I lived with my parents until graduating from high school, then rented out a place during college, briefly moved back in with my parents after college, and rented for the next five years before moving to Kansas City, where I lived in the basement of our office for two years before moving into a house our company owned before finally buying my own place 12 years after I graduated from college (and seven years after I officially became a landlord). 

My experience is admittedly quite odd. But being a tenant before being a homeowner and then a landlord is standard.

Indeed, 65.6% of Americans own their home, but for those under 30, it’s less than 40%. “Tenant,” “homeowner,” and “landlord” often describe the same person in different seasons in their life. Being anti-tenant is like being anti-your younger self, just as being anti-landlord is—in many cases—being anti-your older self.

There are, of course, terrible tenants. We’ve had multiple tenants do well over $10,000 of damage to a unit. We just had one inherited tenant from a portfolio we bought who decided to cook meth in the house. Fun times. 

There are professional tenants who inspire posts like this one on Reddit, who “had tenants in a rental property ($2,400/mo rent) and have not received rent for 15 months” by taking advantage of absurdly liberal landlord/tenant laws in places like New York. And maybe there are even a few who have reached Pacific Heights levels of duplicity. 

At the same time, we all acknowledge that there are bad landlords. They have a name: slumlords. As investors, I’m sure you’ve seen these places. Sometimes, it’s the tenant’s fault: dog feces on the floor, hoarding, etc. Other times, it’s the landlord: mold, leaking roof, furnace that doesn’t work, etc. 

One particularly egregious example is here in Kansas City at the Independence Tower, which had, according to numerous tenants, “holes in our walls with rusted pipes exposed, vermin falling out of those holes, water creating soft spots in the ceilings, and mold.” The tenants began a rent strike before a judge removed the manager, and the city convinced Fannie Mae to provide $1.35 million to update the thoroughly dilapidated, roach-infested property. 

Of course, overall, most bad tenants and landlords just made bad decisions or got unlucky. They’re not malicious. Most bad tenants just can’t afford to pay. The same goes for most bad landlords. But of course, there are terrible ones in each group. 

We should keep this dynamic in mind as we attempt to rebut the often dubious claims from anti-landlord activist groups. I remember a seminar I attended a long time back where the speaker was talking about tenants as if they were “monsters who live in our properties” or some nonsense like that. From time to time, I see discussions of bad tenant laws where the rhetoric starts to get directed at tenants themselves.

And then there’s this meme I saw floating around, which, to this day, I can’t figure out whether it’s meant to be satire or serious.

image2 1

I mean, we certainly provide an important service, but give me a break.

One anti-landlord subreddit posted this abomination, which the poster said was found in a pro-landlord group on Facebook.

image3 1

I sincerely do hope this was the meme equivalent of a “false flag.”

Now, of course, I don’t believe many landlords actually view their tenants this way, and even the harsh rhetoric that pops up when “pro-tenant” groups propose damaging legislation is mostly blowing off steam. But I do think we all need to be careful about how we talk about and view our tenants. We really should look at them like a real estate agent looks at their clients.

I’m sure many agents thought the $418 million settlement for the class action lawsuit against NAR was absurd. But they didn’t view it as being emblematic of a hostile relationship between agents and clients. Nor should we deal with either bad tenants, hostile tenant groups, or deluded Maoists. (Okay, maybe with the deluded Maoists). 

The vast majority of tenants have nothing to do with those people, thinking more in terms of “good landlords” and “bad landlords” and do not hold some broad anti-landlord ideology.

Sure, the relationship is different from that of a real estate agent, as the relationship lasts longer (although real estate agents should see each client as someone with whom they could do multiple transactions, even if the next may be many years in the future). Furthermore, the tenant needs to pay you on a consistent basis instead of with one lump sum that comes out of the proceeds of a sale. It’s very rare that a client would be unable to pay their agent, whereas it’s unfortunately quite common amongst tenants.

But every sort of agent-client relationship is different. Attorneys have different relationships with their clients than do engineers or financial advisors, accountants, personal trainers, etc. Thinking of our tenants as clients, treating them that way, and talking about them that way will go a long way toward reducing the tensions between tenants and landlords, in the same way, that building more housing will reduce the cost of housing from becoming a permanent impediment to homeownership. 

The Business Reasons for Treating Your Tenants as Clients

A study conducted a while back showed the more a doctor talked with his or her patient, the less likely that doctor was to be sued for whatever reason. The key lesson is that when people feel respected, they are much more likely to be amenable to you and your interests.

There are several major ways this can apply to your real estate business. I wrote a piece a long time ago about how my brother (who was our property manager at the time) not only talked a tenant out of suing us but got her to ask if we would rent another property to her…in one conversation! He did this by putting himself on the tenant’s side

“Make something other than yourself the ‘enemy.’ It could be the lease, the law, company policy, or even the owner. But the enemy is certainly not the property manager. No, you as the property manager are the tenant’s ally. So, for example: ‘I appreciate how hard this is; however, we have to follow the lease, and the lease mandates that we charge these expenses. We legally can’t make an exception for one unless we make it for all.’”

In my humble opinion, this should be the textbook example of how to treat your tenants as clients.

Another key point to remember is that happy tenants renew their leases. Depending on where you live, the biggest operating cost you will have is either property taxes or turnover, which is both the vacancy and repair expenses. There’s only so much you can do about property taxes, but there is a ton you can do to increase how long your tenant stays.

By far, the biggest thing you can do is to provide high-quality maintenance. People rarely renew their lease if their sewer line keeps backing up or the heat never works in the winter.

Second is good communication, especially if a maintenance issue is taking longer than expected. Next is to be fair and respectful when there are issues. 

Yes, you should be firm, of course. Being a pushover will get you nowhere in property management. But there’s no need to take lease violations or late payments personally. Feeling respected is important to everyone, especially people in a difficult and embarrassing situation, like being behind on their rent. 

And then you can even go beyond those basics. The guy who has mastered this is Jeffrey Taylor, or “Mr. Landlord.” His book The Landlord’s Survival Guide is definitely worth reading and takes many successful concepts from the hospitality industry into property management. Taylor has gotten his average stay up to over six years (double the national average) with these techniques, which has substantially increased his profitability (and reduced his headaches to boot). 

Treating your tenants as clients is good for the bottom line.

Final Thoughts

I certainly hope this didn’t come off as a lecture or affront to other real estate investors and landlords. I don’t think genuinely anti-tenant attitudes are particularly common, and I’ve slipped on this from time to time when dealing with a particularly awful tenant or while being berated by some activist group as well

That said, I do want to emphasize we should all be highly cognizant of our attitudes and behaviors in this respect, especially as the natural reaction to criticism from anti-landlord groups is to become defensive. This defensiveness can manifest itself as an attack on tenants in general when it’s a relatively small group of activists who are making most of the noise. Even in its more mundane forms, such defensiveness can create a sense of “us versus them,” which, again, doesn’t make a lot of sense, given we’ve all been tenants ourselves at one point or another.

By the same token, thinking of and treating our tenants as clients will not only reduce any underlying antagonism between tenants and landlords but also make for good business and will improve our industry’s service and profitability on the whole

It’s all upside to take the tenant-as-client approach to being a landlord.

Find the Hottest Deals of 2025!

Uncover prime deals in today’s market with the brand new Deal Finder created just for investors like you! Snag great deals FAST with custom buy boxes, comprehensive property insights, and property projections.

1 6 1

March 2025 Housing Market Update: Are Price Declines Coming?

How to Save Up to 20% on New Construction Homes

In real estate, timing is everything. Right now, builders across the country are sitting on excess inventory, offering some of the most attractive discounts we’ve seen in years—up to 20% off properties, plus additional incentives like rate buydowns, price reductions, and managerial credits worth tens of thousands of dollars.

If you’ve been waiting for the right moment to invest, this could be your golden opportunity. The issue is that not every buyer can negotiate these types of deals, and they need a partner like Rent To Retirement to help find the best deals in today’s ever-changing market.

Why Are Builders Offering These Discounts?

At first glance, a surplus of new construction homes might sound like a red flag. But savvy investors see the hidden opportunity. Here’s why builders are making these deals—and how you can benefit:

Affordability challenges have slowed retail demand

Rising interest rates and inflation have priced many individual homebuyers out of the market. With demand cooling, builders are eager to move properties off their books. Instead of waiting for the perfect retail buyer, they’re willing to negotiate with investors—offering deep discounts and attractive financing options.

Builders need to keep construction moving

Homebuilders work on large-scale projects, and financing is tied to progress. If homes sit unsold, it disrupts their cash flow. Builders offer discounts to investors who can buy in bulk, like Rent To Retirement, or close quickly to maintain momentum, creating a win-win scenario.

Institutional buyers have slowed down

In recent years, significant funds and institutional investors dominated the build-to-rent space. However, many have temporarily pulled back, leaving builders with additional supply. Instead of waiting for Wall Street to return, they’re shifting focus to individual investors willing to capitalize on negotiated wholesale pricing.

The Investor Advantage: What Makes This a Unique Time?

The best deals are going to buyers like Rent To Retirement, who are buying in bulk in grade-A markets and have the experience in stacking opportunities to bring in the highest returns for investors. 

As Warren Buffett said, “Be greedy when others are fearful.” While many sit on the sidelines, those who act now can lock in properties below market value and create instant equity. 

Here’s how:

Buy below market value and force equity

Builders are selling at discounts, allowing you to buy at 15%-20% below market value. For example, if a home typically sells for $300,000 but you negotiate a 20% discount, you’re purchasing at $240,000—instantly securing a 15%-20% equity position.

Creative financing: Interest rate buydowns and credits

Builders offer rate buydowns in the mid-to-high 3% range, dramatically improving cash flow. Some deals include managerial credits up to $40,000, reducing out-of-pocket costs.

Tax incentives and bonus depreciation

New construction offers significant tax advantages, including bonus depreciation, allowing investors to write off significant portions of their investment upfront. Talk with your CPA to see what type of benefits you can get.

Low-maintenance, high-quality tenants

New builds come with warranties, minimal capital expenditures (capex), and modern features that attract high-quality tenants—resulting in fewer repairs, less turnover, and better rental income stability.

The Build-to-Rent Advantage

The Build-to-Rent (BTR) model offers an alternative path for those looking for a hands-off approach. Builders are partnering with national and regional lease management companies, allowing investors to purchase new homes integrated into a professionally managed rental system. This provides:

  • Turnkey investment properties with tenants and management in place
  • Steady cash flow with less operational hassle
  • Built-in appreciation and equity growth over time

Financing & HELOC Opportunities

One of the most overlooked benefits of buying below market value is leveraging local credit unions or banks that can provide HELOC (home equity line of credit) options. Since many of these properties already have a 15%+ equity cushion, you can refinance or access a HELOC to reinvest in additional properties quicker than if you buy at the top of the market.

Don’t Miss This Window

Most builders currently offer negotiated wholesale pricing, but this opportunity won’t last forever. Once market conditions shift, prices will normalize, and today’s discounts will disappear. The best investors recognize moments like these as rare opportunities to secure high-quality, cash-flowing assets at below-market prices.

Turnkey investing is ideal for busy professionals or those who prefer a hands-off approach, allowing them to own real estate without actively managing their portfolio. It provides an easy entry point into multiple markets, offering guidance from an experienced team to help investors achieve long-term success. If you’re ready to take advantage of unprecedented builder discounts, creative financing, and tax incentives, now is the time to act.

Reach out to Rent To Retirement today if you think this hard-to-beat strategy could be the right fit for you. Time is money, and they have numerous heavily vetted turnkey investment properties.