by Jim Dalrymple II | Jun 5, 2025 | Industry, News Feed
The committee opted to rescind the controversial “no-commingling” policy on Wednesday, one day after NAR’s Multiple Listing Issues and Policies Committee voted to scrap it amid DOJ scrutiny.
Bigger. Better. Bolder. Inman Connect is heading to San Diego. Join thousands of real estate pros, connect with the Inman Community, and gain insights from hundreds of leading minds shaping the industry. If you’re ready to grow your business and invest in yourself, this is where you need to be. Go BIG in San Diego!
Leadership from the National Association of Realtors on Wednesday voted to scrap a controversial policy that separated listings depending on whether they came from multiple listing services or from non-MLS sources.
The policy was known as the “no-commingling” rule. It was an optional policy allowing MLSs to prohibit brokers from displaying listings from MLSs together with those from non-MLS sources. On Tuesday at NAR’s Legislative Meetings gathering, the trade organization’s Multiple Listing Issues and Policies Committee voted to rescind the policy.
The decision to ditch the policy or not then moved on to NAR’s Executive Committee, which voted Wednesday to abandon the rule, according to a statement from NAR.
“The National Association of Realtors Executive Committee repealed the optional non-commingling rule from the MLS Policy Handbook,” the statement noted. “This decision was based on feedback about the rule’s declining usage and relevance in local marketplaces.”
The no-commingling policy has in recent years become a source of controversy for NAR. That controversy sprang in part from an antitrust lawsuit that now-defunct brokerage REX filed against both Zillow and NAR. REX eventually lost that legal battle, and legal filings in the case show that 29 percent of Realtor-affiliated MLSs have chosen not to adopt the rule.
The policy has also attracted scrutiny from the U.S. Department of Justice.
In the case of Zillow, the mega portal began complying with the no-commingling policy years ago, but earlier this spring quietly reversed course and started allowing the display of non-MLS listings alongside other properties on the platform. Non-MLS listings had previously been obscured with a filter that many users never knew existed
Prior to Wednesday’s Executive Committee vote, some members of NAR indicated they were not fans of the policy. Among them, Matt Consalvo — CEO of Arizona Regional MLS (ARMLS) and a member of the Multiple Listing Service Issues and Policies Committee — told Inman he doesn’t like NAR’s optional rules. He also said he believes removing the no-commingling rule provides brokers with greater clarity. ARMLS never adopted the rule.
“When brokers operate in multiple MLSs and there are the optional rules, it confuses them because one MLS may adopt something and another MLS may not,” Consalvo said.
NAR’s Executive Committee was able to make the final decision on rescinding the no-commingling policy due to governance changes that meant the move didn’t need to go before the trade organization’s board of directors.
Correction: Matt Consalvo is part of the Multiple Listing Service Issues and Policies Committee. An earlier version of this story implied that he was part of the Executive Committee.
Email Jim Dalrymple II
by Jim Dalrymple II | May 30, 2025 | Industry, News Feed
Bigger. Better. Bolder. Inman Connect is heading to San Diego. Join thousands of real estate pros, connect with the Inman Community, and gain insights from hundreds of leading minds shaping the industry. If you’re ready to grow your business and invest in yourself, this is where you need to be. Go BIG in San Diego!
It’s hard to recall a more eventful year for the real estate industry than the one that just transpired.
Just over 14 months ago, the National Association of Realtors agreed to settle antitrust commission litigation. That move led to new rules governing agent pay, took place as many large brokerages were settling their own suits and happened as Donald Trump was beginning his eventual march back into the White House.
TAKE THE INMAN INTEL SURVEY FOR MAY
Simultaneously, agents in real estate’s trenches were grappling with the slowest housing market in a generation — conditions fueled by high mortgage rates and low inventory, and which squeezed industry players in a host of unique ways.
Now, it’s against that backdrop that thousands of NAR members will descend on Washington, D.C. on Saturday for the 1.5 million-member trade organization’s annual Realtors Legislative Meetings — a gathering at which real estate leaders craft the organization’s policy, and discuss advocacy and lobbying.
And it’s for all of the above reasons that the gathering may be one of the most consequential of its kind in recent memory.
The event runs from Saturday to Thursday and last year drew about 8,000 attendees. With that scale, a huge number of topics will come up, but keen industry observers are likely to be focused on both political issues such as free speech and fair housing, as well as Realtors’ efforts to stimulate the market.
Read on for the panels and topics that are sure to be discussed long after the conference ends, and be sure to review NAR’s agenda ahead of the event on Saturday. Inman journalist Andrea Brambila will also be on the ground at the event. You can reach her at [email protected].
Speech and harassment
As Inman previously reported, NAR is currently considering Code of Ethics changes related to its policies on speech and harassment.
Matt Difanis, a RE/MAX broker-owner in Illinois and a NAR director, participated in creating the current policy in 2020, and told Inman it was a product of Realtors making hateful comments online and poorly representing the industry.
“In response to a very real proliferation of Realtor hate speech, much of which was in social media outside the context of their real estate transactions, we had state and local leaders begging for better tools,” Difanis recalled.
Now, however, NAR wants to change and clarify the rules that began in 2020. The proposed changes would add a definition of harassment, and stipulate that while Realtors should always follow the Code of Ethics’ principles, they would only be disciplined for harassment that occurs while acting in a professional capacity.
Though the tweaks to NAR’s Code of Ethics will likely only impact a small number of Realtors, the issue is one worth watching closely because it mirrors a larger debate about issues of free speech.
Key sessions:
- Professional standards committee forum, Tuesday, 8:30 a.m.
- Risk Management Issues Committee, Tuesday, 10:30 a.m.
Steering and fair housing
The same agenda also indicates that the Professional Standards Committee will consider steering, which historically was a discriminatory practice that blocked some buyers — most often from minority ethnic groups — from purchasing homes in certain areas. The agenda shows that NAR leaders have continued to receive questions about the issue.
In response, the committee will consider tweaking the language of NAR’s Code of Ethics.
Similar to issues surrounding free speech, steering represents an intersection between real estate and a broader debate about race in the U.S. And within real estate specifically, steering has most recently come up in debates about private listings and who gets to see them.
Key sessions:
- Fair Housing Policy Committee, Monday, 8 a.m.
- Bias Override: Overcoming Barriers to Fair Housing, Sunday, 1 p.m.
- Fair Housing Forward: Networking Reception Featuring NAR’s 2025 Fair Housing Champions, Monday, 3:30 p.m.
Technology and artificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence routinely dominates discussions about the future of real estate, with many leaders arguing that brokers must learn to use new tools or risk being left behind. However, A.I. also raises a host of practical, ethical, and regulatory questions.
The Legislative Meetings will give real estate leaders a chance to consider what role this type of technology has in the industry, as well as what types of regulatory frameworks real estate professionals might support. And these will not be idle meditations; rental software company RealPage is currently locked in multiple lawsuits with government officials over its use of pricing algorithms. Such cases highlight the fact that real estate technology is still something of a new frontier, both for the industry and for regulators.
Key sessions:
- Federal Technology Policy Committee, Monday, 9. a.m.
- iOi Innovation – AI-Powered Advocacy: Elevate Political Impact, Sunday, 11 a.m.
- iOi Innovation – From Leads to Real Conversations: The Tech-Driven Follow-Up Advantage, Tuesday, 3:45 p.m.
Commissions and agent pay
One year ago, commissions were the issue du jour in real estate thanks to antitrust settlements from NAR and various large brokerages. Attention on the issue has ebbed somewhat since, and the latest data suggests commissions have not plummeted as some had feared.
However, a Legislative Meetings agenda shows that NAR’s Professional Standards Committee will still be looking at the issue next week. Among other things, the committee will consider rules that would require Realtors to tell clients that compensation is negotiable and not set by law. The rules additions would also state that Realtors can’t delay or withhold offers while attempting to negotiate compensation.
The attention on agent compensation at the Legislative Meetings highlights the fact that questions about the issue persist, and that the real estate industry is still working to settle on a new status quo.
Key sessions:
- Professional standards committee, Tuesday, 9 a.m.
- Risk Management Issues Committee, Tuesday, 10:30 a.m.
Housing inventory and affordability
Though explicitly political issues such as fair housing and free speech have bled over into the real estate industry, rank and file agents also continue to deal with inventory shortages in their local markets. Difanis said that last year’s Legislative Meetings addressed this issue, with discussions about density, zoning, accessory dwelling units, and other supply-enhancing policies. Those conversations are likely to continue this year, with a focus on how Realtors can advocate for — and lobby lawmakers in favor of — policies that might make building more housing units easier.
Relatedly, Realtors at the event will also discuss federal and state tax policies that impact homeowners and would-be homebuyers, and issues related to insurance.
Real estate coach and educator Dr. Lee Davenport also pointed to inventory as a key issue for the Legislative Meetings. She noted that there are a number of bills currently in congress — the Housing Supply Frameworks Act, the Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act and others — that members of NAR can weigh in on, including during the visits to lawmakers’ offices that are a regular part of the Legislative meetings.
“I think,” she told Inman, “this should probably be one of the highest priorities.”
Key Sessions:
- Federal Legislative & Political Forum, Sunday, 9:45 a.m.
- Total Cost of Ownership: Sustainability Roundtable, Sunday, 11 a.m.
- The Advocacy Scoop, Sunday, 3 p.m.
- Knocking Down Barriers Though Innovative Homeownership Solutions Provided by Fannie Mae, Monday, 1 p.m.
- Regulatory Issues Forum: The Land of Opportunity: Is Deregulation the Key to Innovation and Expansion in Housing?, Monday, 10 a.m.
- Housing Opportunities Committee, Monday, 10 a.m.
- Federal Financing & Housing Policy Committee, Monday, 2 p.m.
- Realtors Land Institute Leadership & Member Meeting, Wednesday, 9 a.m.
- Land Use, Property Rights and Environment Committee, Wednesday, 10 a.m.
- Federal Taxation Committee, Thursday, 8:30 a.m.
Leadership in trouble times
Aside from specific issues, NAR’s Legislative Meetings will also be an opportunity to hear commentary on issues such as multiple listing service policy, and from top leaders such as President Kevin Sears and CEO Nykia Wright. Here are additional key sessions to be aware of:
- The Leadership Scoop, Sunday 9 a.m.
- Business Issues Policy Committee, Sunday, Sunday, 10 a.m.
- Federal Legislative & Political Forum, Sunday, 9:45 a.m.
- The Advocacy Scoop, Sunday, 3 p.m.
- Regulatory Issues Forum, Monday, Monday, 10 a.m.
- Town Hall for Association Leaders, Monday 2:40 p.m.
- Multiple Listing Service Issues & Policies Committee, Tuesday, 1 p.m.
- Board of Directors, Thursday 8:30 a.m.
Email Jim Dalrymple II
This post was originally published on this site
by Jim Dalrymple II | May 23, 2025 | Industry, News Feed
The companies settled in a case known as Hooper. Their settlements have been the subject of months of legal wrangling over allegations that they shopped around for the best deal.
Bigger. Better. Bolder. Inman Connect is heading to San Diego. Join thousands of real estate pros, connect with the Inman Community and gain insights from hundreds of leading minds shaping the industry. If you’re ready to grow your business and invest in yourself, this is where you need to be. Go BIG in San Diego!
After months of legal wrangling, a judge on Friday granted preliminary approval to antitrust commission settlements from eXp World Holdings and Weichert of North America.
The approval came via a 14-page ruling from Judge Mark Cohen, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Cohen wrote in the ruling that the “proposed settlement agreements satisfy the criteria for preliminary approval” and that they appear to be “the product of intensive, thorough, serious, informed, and non-collusive negotiations.”
TAKE THE INMAN INTEL INDEX SURVEY FOR MAY
A final approval hearing is scheduled for Oct. 28. News of the preliminary approval was first reported by Real Estate News.
Preliminary approval of the eXp and Weirchert settlements is significant because, more so than other antitrust commission deals, these two companies’ proposals were engulfed in controversy from the beginning. EXp first announced a settlement last October, agreeing to pay $34 million. Weichert settled a month later.
Both companies settled in a case known as Hooper, which was filed in Georgia.
However, not long after eXp announced its settlement, homesellers in Missouri who were behind a different case known as Gibson pushed back. They argued that eXp, and later Weichert, used a tactic known as a “reverse auction,” which is essentially shopping around among similar class action lawsuits for the one that will yield the best deal. The Missouri homesellers wanted to force the two companies back to the negotiating table and to have the case transferred out of Georgia and into Missouri.
EXp and Weichert objected to the homesellers’ characterization of the settlements and opposed attempts to transfer the case.
Legal wrangling over the two companies’ alleged “sweetheart deals” continued for months, and in March the Georgia judge refused to transfer the case to Missouri.
In Friday’s ruling, Cohen also determined that he had jurisdiction over the case.
In addition to eXp and Weichert, Cohen also granted preliminary approval on Friday to settlements involving Mark Spain Real Estate Atlanta Communities Real Estate.
Read the full order granting preliminary approval here:
Email Jim Dalrymple II
This post was originally published on this site
by Jim Dalrymple II | May 21, 2025 | Industry, News Feed
NextHome’s James Dwiggins argued during Inman On Tour Miami that Compass is “steering” clients. Compass’ Mark McLaughlin said Compass clients aren’t being “duped.”
Bigger. Better. Bolder. Inman Connect is heading to San Diego. Join thousands of real estate pros, connect with the Inman Community, and gain insights from hundreds of leading minds shaping the industry. If you’re ready to grow your business and invest in yourself, this is where you need to be. Go BIG in San Diego!
The ongoing and ever-heated real estate industry debate over private listings spilled onto the Inman stage Wednesday as panelists debated the wisdom of the concept and whether it amounted to “steering.”
The debate took place during an afternoon panel at Inman On Tour Miami, which featured NextHome CEO James Dwiggins, Compass Chief Real Estate Strategist Mark McLaughlin and the Keyes Company President Christina Pappas.
Midway through the conversation, Dwiggins argued that sellers can do whatever they want and that there are many different flavors of listing right now. However, when “we talk about seller choice, there’s a difference between choice and steering.”
TAKE THE INMAN INTEL SURVEY FOR MAY
Dwiggins’ comment was a reference to Compass, which has made private listings a centerpiece of its marketing efforts, and which disclosed in a recent lawsuit that nearly half of its listings are “pre-marketed” — meaning they first begin as Compass private exclusives or with “coming soon” status before later entering the local multiple listing service.
“That’s called steering,” Dwiggins added.
However, McLaughlin quickly objected, saying that Dwiggins’ argument essentially amounted to saying that “20,000 of Compass’ clients are duped and steered.”
Dwiggins then shot back, saying that most consumers likely don’t understand or read contracts that lay out how privately listing their home might work.
Dwiggins has become one of the most prominent voices in the real estate industry pushing back against private listings, while Compass CEO Robert Reffkin is among the concept’s most prominent advocates.
From left to right, moderator Brad Inman, Christina Pappas, James Dwiggins and Mark McLaughlin at Inman On Tour Miami Wednesday. Credit: Mike Nyffeler with AJ Canaria Creative Services.
The debate over private listings engulfed much of the homeselling business in late 2024 and early 2025 as different players put pressure on the National Association of Realtors to take action on Clear Cooperation, a rule that requires NAR members to put their listings into their local MLS within a day after they begin marketing. In the end, NAR staked out a kind of middle ground, keeping Clear Cooperation in place but adding a new delayed marketing option.
During Wednesday’s debate, McLaughlin responded to a frequent criticism of Compass’ position — namely, that the company merely wants to double-end more deals — by saying that more than 50 percent of the brokerage’s listings that don’t hit the MLS are co-brokered.
Later on Wednesday, after this story had published, a Compass spokesperson suggested to Inman that by penalizing agents or brokers who fail to enter their listings into the MLS within one business day, multiple listing services were the ones engaged in “steering” practices.
“It’s worth noting that the MLSs fine agents up to $5,000 if the agent doesn’t steer their clients into the MLS,” the spokesperson wrote in a statement to Inman. “The Clear Cooperation Policy’s ‘mandatory submission’ rule results in agents steering clients into the MLS out of fear of being fined by the MLS.”
Meanwhile, Pappas took a kind of middle position — and offered a warning. Regarding seller choice, she said, “I believe in allowing our sellers a choice in how it gets marketed. They need all of the information possible to make the best decision.”
However, she also recalled a situation during the COVID-19 pandemic in which a buyer sued her company after buying an off-market property. Turns out, because the property was off-market, the buyer didn’t have a good sense of the home’s market value.
“The buyer sues us because he thought he overpaid,” Pappas said.
After the story ended, Dwiggins added that “there’s a lot more of that coming.”
Alternatively, McLaughlin had earlier argued during the discussion that “the one opinion that’s missing here is the opinion of the homeseller.” And he said he believes “the decision on how to do marketing should create a competitive environment.”
“It should be,” he added, “at the intersection of the seller’s desire and the agent’s professional advice.”
Email Jim Dalrymple II
This post was originally published on this site
by Jim Dalrymple II | May 20, 2025 | Industry, News Feed
Michael Liebowitz argued at Inman On Tour Miami that real estate agents’ job is to educate consumers and help them understand risks — but that those consumers should still have a choice in how they market their homes.
Bigger. Better. Bolder. Inman Connect is heading to San Diego. Join thousands of real estate pros, connect with the Inman Community, and gain insights from hundreds of leading minds shaping the industry. If you’re ready to grow your business and invest in yourself, this is where you need to be. Go BIG in San Diego!
Douglas Elliman CEO Michael Liebowitz kicked off Inman On Tour Miami Tuesday morning with a defense of private listings, saying that consumers should have choices — and offering some slight criticism of other unnamed players who are also championing the private listing concept.
Liebowitz appeared as part of a three-person panel, and began his comments by saying that the real estate industry is currently experiencing significant change. One of the largest of those choices has to do with private listings, Liebowitz said, adding that “I’m a big believer in you’ve got to give the client choice.”
“It’s for me as the CEO of a company to make sure the client understands the risks,” Liebowitz continued, adding a moment later that “you have to offer choice.”
TAKE THE INMAN INTEL SURVEY FOR MAY
Liebowitz went on to say that a listing is likely to get a better price if more people can see it, but that different homeowners have different priorities and an agent’s job is to educate. He added that he himself once listed his own home as a private listing years ago due to concerns about how his neighbors might react to the news that he was moving. However, Liebowitz said, he eventually ended up listing the home publicly, which led to him finding a buyer.
Michael Liebowitz on stage at Inman On Tour Miami on Tuesday. Credit: Mike Nyffeler with AJ Canaria Creative Services
A debate over private listings has roiled the real estate industry in recent months. On the one hand, proponents of the concept have argued that it gives homeowners choice and potentially protects their privacy, among other things. The most publicly vocal advocate of private listings in the industry has been Compass CEO Robert Reffkin, who has made the concept a centerpiece of his brokerage’s marketing efforts. However, other companies have also rolled out their own private listing networks.
However, private listings also have many critics who argue that the concept potentially has negative impacts on fair housing, and that an open marketplace is most beneficial to homeowners. Zillow has been among the entities taking this position, and went so far as to ban privately marketed listings from its platform.
Zillow Chief Industry Development Officer Errol Samuelson also appeared on Tuesday’s panel with Liebowitz, though Samuelson’s comments focused primarily on artificial intelligence.
During his remarks, Liebowitz did not mention any other companies by name. However, he did hint that he doesn’t agree with how some brokerages have engaged with the private listing concept.
“Others are using it for different reasons than that,” Liebowitz said after discussing private listings as a tool advancing consumer choice. “They’re using it for other business plans. We are focused on the client.”
In addition to Liebowitz and Samuelson, LPT founder and CEO Robert Palmer also appeared during Tuesday morning’s panel. Much of Palmer’s commentary focused on the market, with him noting that “right now, our kind of word of the year so far is maybe ‘uncertainty.’”
However, Palmer also weighed in on private listings, saying that “if it’s truly a private listing, great.” However, he criticized private listings that don’t end up in a multiple listing service but are nevertheless marketed to the public in other forums.
“If private listing becomes proxy for circumventing cooperation,” Palmer said, “I think that becomes a problem.”
Email Jim Dalrymple II
This post was originally published on this site