Whether it’s refining your business model, mastering new technologies, or discovering strategies to capitalize on the next market surge, Inman Connect New York will prepare you to take bold steps forward. The Next Chapter is about to begin. Be part of it. Join us and thousands of real estate leaders Jan. 22-24, 2025.

The Department of Justice has charged a Missouri woman in connection with a scheme to take ownership of Elvis Presley’s former home, Graceland, and extort his descendants for millions of dollars, the department announced on Friday.

The date happened to coincide with the anniversary of Elvis Presley’s death in 1977. Presley was found unresponsive at Graceland that day, 47 years ago, at the age of 42.

The 53-year-old, Lisa Jeanine Findley, was arrested on Friday morning for allegedly coordinating the attempted foreclosure of Graceland by claiming that Presley’s late daughter, Lisa Marie Presley, had put Graceland up as collateral on a loan she failed to repay before she died in 2023.

“The defendant orchestrated a scheme to conduct a fraudulent sale of Graceland, falsely claiming that Elvis Presley’s daughter had pledged the historic landmark as collateral for a loan that she failed to repay before her death,” said Nicole M. Argentieri, principal deputy assistant attorney general at the Justice Department.

Findley has been charged with mail fraud and aggravated identity theft. If convicted, she could spend a mandatory minimum of two years in prison for aggravated identity theft and a maximum of 20 years for mail fraud.

According to prosecutors, she has gone by the aliases Lisa Holden, Lisa Howell, Lisa Jeanine Sullins, Carolyn Williams, Gregory Naussany and Kurt Naussany.

In May, an individual who represented themselves as being associated with a fake private lender company known as Naussany Investments, which had attempted to take over Graceland through foreclosure, responded to an email from The New York Times and allegedly revealed themselves to be a fraudster based in Nigeria.

“I am the one who creates trouble,” the email writer said, suggesting their deep involvement on the dark web and clandestine networks throughout the U.S. “We figure out how to steal. That’s what we do.”

Court documents say that Findley represented herself as various employees of Naussany Investments and claimed that Lisa Marie Presley had borrowed $2.8 million from the company. Prosecutors said the loan never existed.

By filing false foreclosure documents, deeds and claims in court, Findley tried to get the Presley family to hand over $2.85 million to Naussany Investments, or they would auction off the property to the highest bidder.

However, Lisa Marie Presley’s daughter, actor Danielle Riley Keough, sued to retain ownership of the property, which she had inherited on her mother’s death. Keough claimed the loan was not legitimate and that Naussany Investments was “a false entity.” Keough’s lawyers also claimed signatures of Ms. Presley and a notary on some of Naussany’s documents had been forged.

After the foreclosure of Graceland was blocked by a Chancery Court in Tennessee following Keough’s lawsuit, Naussany ceased all attempts at foreclosure. The court had determined that the foreclosure auction would irreparably harm Keough and postponed the foreclosure until it could be determined who maintained rights to the property.

Earlier this summer, the Tennessee attorney general’s office handed over its investigation to the Justice Department.

The Postal Inspection Service also reportedly played a role in the investigation, making a connection between Naussany Investments’ business address at a post office in Hollister, Missouri, near Findley’s home, where she rented P.O. Box 1015. The rental application had been submitted under the name “Lisa Holden,” one of Findley’s aliases.

On Friday, law enforcement officials expressed surprise at the audacity of a fraudster to target such a high-profile property.

U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Tennessee Kevin G. Ritz said in a statement, “As a Memphian, I know that Graceland is a national treasure.”

Get Inman’s Luxury Lens Newsletter delivered right to your inbox. A weekly deep dive into the biggest news in the world of high-end real estate delivered every Friday. Click here to subscribe.

Email Lillian Dickerson

Inman Connect is moving from Las Vegas to San Diego in 2025 and it’ll be bigger, better and bolder than ever before. Join us for Inman Connect San Diego on July 30-Aug. 1, 2025 with the brightest minds in real estate to shape the future of the industry. Reserve your spot today for an exclusive discount.

Is this the beginning of the end for Zillow Gone Wild? That’s the question the account’s fans are asking after professional photographer Jennifer Bouma filed a $300,000 copyright infringement lawsuit against Zillow Gone Wild’s parent company, Kale Salad, Inc., on July 29.

According to court documents, listing agents Barbara Orr and John Logue hired Bouma to take photos of a sprawling four-bedroom, 2.5-bathroom medieval-style estate in Monroe, Washington, in September 2021. The listing quickly garnered the attention of the internet, with Zillow Gone Wild posting Bouma’s photos of a courtyard dragon statue and Arthurian dining room on its Substack, Instagram and X, formerly known as Twitter, accounts in February 2022.

Bouma said she didn’t realize Zillow Gone Wild had posted her photos until April 2024 since account founder Samir Mezrahi never asked for consent. As the copyright owner, she attempted to negotiate a payment of $12,500 to $15,000 per photo; however, Bouma’s attorney, David C. Deal, told Fast Company that payment negotiations with Kale Salad, Inc. and its insurance provider stalled. Now, Bouma is suing for the maximum amount of $150,000 per photo plus attorney fees.

“Zillow Gone Wild . . . are in the business of copying the work of others for display on their website and social media,” Deal said.

Mezrahi and Kale Salad, Inc. have been quiet about the lawsuit. Deal said he expects the defendants’ counsel to say Zillow Gone Wild is protected by the fair use doctrine, which allows the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances.

The United States Copyright Office’s fair use doctrine explainer said courts are “more likely” to find that using copyright-protected works for nonprofit education and noncommercial use is OK, especially if the creator added something new to the copyrighted work. The explainer noted courts also consider the “quantity and quality of the copyrighted material” a creator used and whether a creator’s unlicensed use of a copyrighted work harms the original creator’s current or future ability to financially benefit from said work, among other factors.

“In addition to the above, other factors may also be considered by a court in weighing a fair use question, depending upon the circumstances,” the explainer read. Courts evaluate fair use claims on a case-by-case basis, and the outcome of any given case depends on a fact-specific inquiry. This means that there is no formula to ensure that a predetermined percentage or amount of a work — or specific number of words, lines, pages, copies — may be used without permission.

Several copyright experts were split on whether Zillow Gone Wild would have difficulty convincing courts that its work is protected by the fair use doctrine.

“The case is straightforward copyright infringement,” University of Sussex copyright law expert Andres Guadamuz told FC, noting that Mezrahi tends to post listing photos as-is, striking out the ability to argue that Zillow Gone Wild is using photos in a new or transformative way.

However, Northeastern University law professor Alexandra J. Roberts said Zillow Gone Wild’s captions often offer commentary on a wily real estate market — something that could push them into fair use territory. “The character of the defendant’s use is an important factor, and in this case, the use appears to be comment and criticism — and perhaps satire — which are core functions that fair use aspires to protect,” she said.

Deal said he’s fully prepared to take on Zillow Gone Wild, noting that his client’s lawsuit may lead to a flood of complaints from other photographers, especially as Mezrahi moves forward on a nine-episode show with HGTV.

“If they want to fully litigate the issue of fair use, it comes with a lot of risk,” he said. “If they lose, they really lose because we have all these other clients who are in effectively the exact same position as Miss Bouma.”

Read the full lawsuit below: 

Email Marian McPherson